Skip to main content
Log in

Does Analysis of Biomarkers in Tumor Cells in Lymph Node Metastases Give Additional Prognostic Information in Primary Breast Cancer?

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prognostic and treatment-predictive biomarkers in primary breast cancer are routinely analyzed in the primary tumor, whereas metastatic tumor cells in lymph node metastases are not characterized. The present study aimed to define the concordance between biomarkers in matched pairs of breast cancers and lymph node metastases and to relate their expression to clinical outcome.

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for 2 years were included. A tissue microarray of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was constructed, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 were analyzed immunohistochemically in 262, 257, 104, and 101 patients, respectively. Five years’ distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was used as the primary end point.

Results

The concordance for biomarker expression in primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases was 93% for ER, 84% for PR, 97% for HER2, and 85% for Ki67. The discordant cases for HER2 status were all negative in the tumor but positive in the node. ER positivity was a significant independent predictor of improved 5-year DDFS when analyzed in the primary tumor as well as in the lymph node metastases. Ki67 positivity analyzed in both locations correlated with shortened DDFS. HER2 positivity at both locations was an indicator of early relapse.

Conclusions

The concordance for the biomarkers analyzed in matched pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was high. Moreover, survival analyses showed that the expression of biomarkers in lymph node metastases can provide prognostic information when no analyses of the primary tumor can be done. Treatment selection based on biomarkers in the lymph node is a topic for further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cinieri S, Orlando L, Fedele P et al (2007) Adjuvant strategies in breast cancer: new prospectives, questions and reflections at the end of 2007. St. Gallen international expert consensus conference. Ann Oncol 18(Suppl 6):vi63–vi65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE (1989) Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24, 740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 63:181–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM et al (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2334–2340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Group (1998) Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 351:1451–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B et al (2005) Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1659–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 Collaborative Group, Thurlimann B et al (2005) A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:2747–2757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hurvitz SA, Pietras RJ (2008) Rational management of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of estrogen receptor biology, treatment options, and future directions. Cancer 113:2385–2397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein CA (2009) Parallel progression of primary tumors and metastases. Nat Rev Cancer 9(4):302–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De la Haba-Rodriguez JR, Ruiz Borrego M, Gómez España A et al (2004) Comparative study of the immunohistochemical phenotype in breast cancer and its lymph node metastatic location. Cancer Investig 22(2):219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dikicioglu E, Barutca S, Meydan N et al (2005) Biological characteristics of breast cancer at the primary tumor and the involved lymph nodes. Int J Clin Pract 59(9):1039–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cardoso F, Di Leo A, Larsimont D et al (2001) Evaluation of HER2, p53, bcl-2, topoisomerase II-alpha, heat-shock proteins 27 and 70 in primary breast cancer and metastatic ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. Ann Oncol 42(7):615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chebil G, Bendahl PO, Idvall I et al (2003) Comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical assay of steroid receptors in primary breast cancer—clinical associations and reasons for discrepancies. Acta Oncol 42:719–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Honeth G, Bendahl PO, Ringner M et al (2008) The CD44+/CD24− phenotype is enriched in basal-like breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res 10:R53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahlin C, Aaltonen K, Amini RM et al (2007) Ki67 and cyclin A as prognostic factors in early breast cancer. What are the optimal cut-off values? Histopathology 51:491–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Becker TE, Ellsworth RE, Deyarmin B et al (2008) The genomic heritage of lymph node metastases: implications for clinical management of patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1056–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weigelt B, Glas AM, Wessels LF et al (2003) Gene expression profiles of primary breast tumors maintained in distant metastases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15901–15905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10869–10874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Santinelli A, Pisa E, Stramazzotti E et al (2008) HER2 status discrepancy between primary lesions and metastatic sites. Impact on targeted therapy. Int J Cancer 122(5):999–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryden L, Haglund M, Bendahl PO et al (2009) Reproducibility of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 analysis in primary breast cancer—a national survey performed at pathology departments in Sweden. Acta Oncol 48:860–866

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the participating departments of the South Sweden Breast Cancer Group for providing us with breast cancer samples and clinical follow-up data; to Kristina Lövgren for skilled technical assistance with preparation of the tissue microarray, staining procedures, and examination of the slides; and to Janica Kallonen for examination of the slides. The study was supported by funds from the medical faculty and University Hospital Lund (ALF), The University Hospital of Lund Research Foundation, the Swedish Pink Ribbon Campaign, and Skåne County Council’s research and development Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Rydén.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falck, AK., Fernö, M., Bendahl, PO. et al. Does Analysis of Biomarkers in Tumor Cells in Lymph Node Metastases Give Additional Prognostic Information in Primary Breast Cancer?. World J Surg 34, 1434–1441 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0499-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0499-z

Keywords

Navigation