Abstract
Background
The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course uses standardized porcine simulation to teach the repair of penetrating trauma. It is offered in 26 sites in the United States, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, and Japan. The purpose of the present study was to query ATOM participants regarding their perceptions of the value and influence of the ATOM course on knowledge, confidence, and skill to repair penetrating injuries.
Methods
An anonymous, voluntary survey was posted on the Internet at surveymonkey.com. E-mail notification was sent to all 1,001 ATOM participants through May 2008. Items requested agreement/disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale and space for comments. Agreement indicated positive perceptions of ATOM.
Results
A total of 962 surgeons received the request to complete the survey; 444 ATOM participants from 36 states and 17 countries participated, for a response rate of 46%. Range of agreement with all of the items was 75.4–99.0%. Results include the following: 78.9% (95% CI, 74.7–82.6%) can identify injuries more quickly; 80.7% (95% CI, 76.6–84.3%) have a more organized operative approach; 81.1% (95% CI, 77.0–84.6%) can control bleeding more quickly; 86.1% (95% CI, 82.4–89.2%) can control injuries more effectively; 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7–89.4%) are more competent trauma surgeons; 87.0% are more confident (95% CI, 83.4–89.9%), and 89.2% are more knowledgeable (95% CI, 85.8–91.8%) about repairing penetrating injuries; 99% (95% CI, 97.4–99.7%) said ATOM is worthwhile. Overall, 87.4% of the comments were positive.
Conclusions
Participants worldwide perceive that ATOM is worthwhile and helps surgeons improve knowledge, confidence, and skill in repairing penetrating injuries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006) WISQARS fatal injuries and nonfatal injuries: reports (2006). Available at: http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate.html. Accessed 29 Apr 2009
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2008) Frequently asked questions about the ACGME common duty hour standards. Available at: http:/www.acgme/acWebsite/dutyHours/dh_faqs.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2009
Jacobs LM, Burns KJ, Kaban JM et al (2003) Development and evaluation of the Advanced Trauma Operative Management course. J Trauma 55:471–479
Jacobs LM, Burns KJ, Luk S et al (2004) Implementation of the Advanced Trauma Operative Management course. PanAm J Trauma 11:21–27
Jacobs LM, Burns KJ, Luk SS (2006) Advanced Trauma Operative Management Course: site and instructor selection and evaluation. J Am Coll Surg 203:772–779
Jacobs LM, Burns KJ, Luk SS et al (2005) Follow-up survey of participants attending the Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course. J Trauma 58:1140–1143
QuickCalcs. Confidence intervals. Available at: http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs. Accessed 21 Apr 2009
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Gloria Opirhory, PhD, Vijay Jayaraman, MD, and Jack Alberti, MS, for their assistance with the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobs, L., Burns, K., Luk, S. et al. Advanced Trauma Operative Management Course: Participant Survey. World J Surg 34, 164–168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0276-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0276-z