Skip to main content
Log in

Unroofing and Curettage for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Pilonidal Disease

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Various surgical techniques are available in the management of pilonidal sinus, but controversy concerning the optimal surgical approach persists. The present study analyzes the outcome of unroofing and curettage as the primary intervention for acute and chronic pilonidal disease.

Methods

A total of 297 consecutive patients presenting with chronic disease, acute abscess, or recurrent disease were treated with unroofing and curettage. The wound was left open to heal by secondary intention. Hospitalization, time required to resume daily activities and return to work, healing time, and recurrence rates were recorded.

Results

All patients were discharged within the first 24 h after operation. The median period before returning to work was 3.2 ± 1.2 days, and the mean time for wound healing was 5.4 ± 1.1 weeks. Six patients were readmitted with recurrence of the disease within the first six postoperative months. All recurrences were in patients who did not follow the wound care advice and who did not come to regular weekly appointments. Patients with recurrence underwent repeat surgery by the same technique with good results.

Conclusions

Unroofing and curettage for pilonidal sinus disease is an easy and effective technique. The vast majority of the patients, including those with abscess as well as those with chronic disease, will heal with this simple procedure, after which even recurrences can be managed successfully with the same procedure. Relying on these results, we advocate unroofing and curettage as the procedure of choice in the management of pilonidal disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akıncı OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A et al (1999) Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 165:339–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2007) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arda IS, Güney LH, Sevmiş S et al (2005) High body mass index as a possible risk factor for pilonidal sinus disease in adolescents. World J Surg 29:469–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alspaugh D, Hyman N (2001) Pilonidal disease. Prob Gen Surg 18:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Da Silva JH (2000) Pilonidal cyst. Cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1146–1156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sondenna K, Andersen E, Nesvik I et al (1995) Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bissett IP, Isbister WH (1987) The management of patients with pilonidal disease—a comparative study. Aust N Z J Surg 57:939–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Füzün M, Bakir H, Soylu M et al (1994) Which technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus— open or closed? Dis Colon Rectum 37:1148–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Hassan HK, Francis IM, Neglén P (1990) Primary closure or secondary granulation after excision of pilonidal sinus? Acta Chir Scand 156:695–699

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R (2005) Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:415–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kronberg I, Christensen KI, Zimmerman-Nielson O (1986) Chronic pilonidal disease: a randomised trial with complete three year follow up. Br J Surg 72:303–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Soreide JA (1992) Morbidity and short term results in a randomised trial of open compared with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Eur J Surg 158:351–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao M, Zawislak W, Gilliland R (2001) A prospective randomised trial comparing two treatment modalities for chronic pilonidal sinus. Int J Colorectal Dis 3(Suppl 1):102 Abstract

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abu Galala KH, Salam IM, Abu Samaan KR et al (1999) Treatment of pilonidal sinus by primary closure with a transposed rhomboid flap compared with deep suturing: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Surg 165:468–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cihan A, Ucan BH, Comert M et al (2006) Superiority of asymmetric modified Limberg flap for surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 49:244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E et al (2005) Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg 190:388–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fazeli MS, Adel MG, Abaschi AH (2006) Comparison of outcomes in Z plasty and delayed healing by secondary intention of the wound after excision of the sacral pilonidal sinus: results of a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1831–1836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Testini M, Piccinni G, Miniello S et al (2001) Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique. Colorectal Dis 3:427–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mansoory A, Dickson D (1982) Z-plasty for treatment of disease of the pilonidal sinus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:409–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Manterola C, Barroso M, Araya JC (1991) Pilonidal disease: 25 cases treated by the Dufourmentel technique. Dis Colon Rectum 34:649–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Militio G, Cortese F, Casciani CU (1998) Rhomboid flap procedure for pilonidal sinus: results from 67 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:113–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen S, Aumann G, Kramer A et al (2007) Short term results of Kardayakis flap for pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bascom JU (1981) Pilonidal disease: correcting over treatment and under treatment. Contemp Surg 18:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parvaiz A, Kennedy R (2001) Bascom’s procedure in the day surgical management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 88:155–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Senapati A, Cripps NP, Thompson MR (2000) Bascom’s operation in the day—surgical management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 87:1067–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soll C, Hahnloser D, Dindo D et al (2008) A novel approach for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: less is more. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:177–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stephens FO, Stephens RB (1995) Pilonidal sinus: management objectives. Aust N Z J Surg 65:558–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilknur Kepenekci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kepenekci, I., Demirkan, A., Celasin, H. et al. Unroofing and Curettage for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Pilonidal Disease. World J Surg 34, 153–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0245-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0245-6

Keywords

Navigation