Abstract
Background
The double tract (DT) method was compared with the Roux-en-Y (R-Y) method to identify the optimal reconstruction procedure after total gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. The DT reconstruction is as simple as the R-Y, and it can be safely performed even after total gastrectomy. However, these have been no studies evaluating the usefulness of DT reconstruction in comparison to R-Y reconstruction.
Methods
A group of 44 patients with gastric cancer were intraoperatively randomized for R-Y (n = 23) or DT reconstruction (n = 21) after total gastrectomy (TG). Body weight, food intake, nutritional conditions, and quality of life (QOL) were determined at 3 and 12 months after the operation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00746161.
Results
Food intake significantly decreased soon after the operation. No differences were observed between the DT and R-Y groups. The body weight decreased throughout the ensuing period (P < 0.05) and thereafter gradually recovered. However, no differences were observed between the two groups. Among the nutritional laboratory parameters, serum prealbumin, retinol-binding protein, total cholesterol, and triglyceride were decreased soon after the operation. The changes of those parameters were not substantially different between the two groups. The postoperative QOL was evaluated, and no differences were observed between those groups.
Conclusions
There were no particular advantages in the DT method after TG in comparison to the simple R-Y method in terms of body weight, QOL, and nutritional conditions, suggesting that the DT method might not be recommended after TG for patients with gastric cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schlatter C (1897) Uber Ernihrung und Verdaunng nach vollstindiger Entfernung des Magens: Osophagoenterostomie beim Menschen. Beitr Klin Chir 19:757–776
Orr PG (1947) A modified technique for total gastrectomy. Arch Surg 54:279
Nakane Y, Okumura S, Akehira K et al (1995) Jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 222:27–35
Chin AC, Espat NJ (2003) Total gastrectomy: option for the restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. Lancet Oncol 4:241–276
Fujiwara Y, Kusunoki M, Nakagawa K et al (2000) Evaluation of J-pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy: rho-double tract vs. J-pouch double tract. Dig Surg 17:475–482
Iivonen MK, Mattila JJ, Nordback IH et al (2000) Long-term follow-up of patients with jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 35:679–685
Nakane Y, Michiura T, Inoue K et al (2001) A randomized clinical trial of pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer: which is the better technique, Roux-en-Y or interposition? Hepatogastroenterology 48:903–907
Kono K, Iizuka H, Sekikawa T et al (2003) Improved quality of life with jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Am J Surg 185:150–154
Endo S, Nishida T, Nishikawa K et al (2006) Motility of the pouch correlates with quality of life after total gastrectomy. Surgery 139:493–500
El Halabi HM, Lawrence W Jr (2008) Clinical results of various reconstructions employed after total gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol 97:186–192
Fein M, Fuchs KH, Thalheimer A et al (2008) Long-term benefits of Roux-en Y pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 247:759–765
Schwarz A, Büchler M, Usinger K et al (1996) Importance of the duodenal passage and pouch volume after total gastrectomy and reconstruction with the Ulm pouch: prospective randomized clinical study. World J Surg 20:60–66
Fuchs KH, Thiede A, Engemann R et al (1995) Reconstruction of the food passage after total gastrectomy: randomized trial. World J Surg 19:698–706
Adachi S, Inagawa S, Enomoto T et al (2003) Subjective and functional results after total gastrectomy: prospective study for longterm comparison of reconstruction procedures. Gastric Cancer 6:24–29
Kalmar K, Nemeth J, Kelemen A et al (2006) Postprandial gastrointestinal hormone production is different, depending on the type of reconstruction following total gastrectomy. Ann Surg 243:465–471
Kajitani K, Sato J (1965) Evaluation of the procedures of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy (in Japanese). J Jpn Surg Soc 66:1285–1287
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–24
Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G (1984) Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Jpn J Surg 85:1001–1005
Nakajima T, Kinoshita T, Nashimoto A et al (2007) Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant uracil-tegafur versus surgery alone for serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer. Br J Surg 94:1468–1476
Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357:1810–1820
Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F et al (1999) Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 83:18–29
Roder DM (2002) The epidemiology of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 5(Suppl 1):5–11
Tsujinaka T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S et al (2007) Influence of overweight on surgical complications for gastric cancer: results from a randomized control trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic D3 lymphadenectomy (JCOG9501). Ann Surg Oncol 14:355–361
Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Nakamori M et al (2009) Influence of overweight on gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy: an analysis of 689 consecutive cases managed by a single center. Arch Surg 144:351–358 discussion 358
Fujiwara Y, Kusunoki M, Nakagawa K et al (1998) Scintigraphic assessment of double tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Dig Surg 15:404–409
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwahashi, M., Nakamori, M., Nakamura, M. et al. Evaluation of Double Tract Reconstruction After Total Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. World J Surg 33, 1882–1888 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0109-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0109-0