Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous Monitoring of Adverse Events: Influence on the Quality of Care and the Incidence of Errors in General Surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to determine the incidence of adverse events and errors in the care of surgical patients and to demonstrate that continuous prospective collection of data on adverse events can improve quality of care and reduce the number of errors. Retrospective studies find adverse events in approximately 5% of patients admitted. Prospective studies publish figures of approximately 30%. No studies to date have tried to use continuous collection of data on adverse events to reduce the incidence of errors.

Methods

Longitudinal prospective surveillance of adverse events in patients admitted to the Surgery Service during a 22-month period. Sequelae after discharge and errors during hospital stay were evaluated by peer review.

Results

A total of 3,807 patients were controlled: 1,177 patients presented 2,193 adverse events (30.9% of admissions); 330 adverse events due to errors were detected in 258 patients (6.9% of admissions). Thirty-four deaths were considered due to adverse events (0.89% of admissions), and in 11 cases mortality was deemed avoidable (0.29% of admissions). The incidence of adverse events remained constant during the study period, but errors decreased from 11.1% to 4.5% (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

This is the first attempt to determine the prevalence of errors in surgery. Introducing systematic programs for recording adverse events can reduce error rates and promote a culture of patient safety in a General Surgery Department.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osborn DA (1967) Errors in blood transfusion. BMJ 4(5578):550–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaty HN, Petersdorf RG (1966) Iatrogenic factors in infectious disease. Ann Intern Med 65:641–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seckler SG, Spritzer RC (1966) Disseminated disease of medical progress. Arch Intern Med 117:447–450

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mills DH, Boyden JS, Rubamen DS (1977) Report on the medical insurance study. Sutter, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  5. Couch NP, Tilney NL, Rayner AA, Moore FD (1981) The high cost of low-frequency events; the anatomy and economics of surgical mishaps. N Engl J Med 304:634–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird N, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG et al (1991) The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126:66–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Calland JF, Adams RB, Benjamin DK, O’Connor MJ, Chandrasekhara V, Guerlain S et al (2002) Thirty-day postoperative death rate at an academic medical center. Ann Surg 235:690–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wanzel KR, Jamieson CG, Bohnen JM (2000) Complications on a general surgery service: incidence and reporting. Can J Surg 43:113–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, Rogers FB, Burns E (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. The Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (2005) Transforming healthcare quality through information technologies. http://www.ahcpr.gov/fund/grantix.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2005

  14. Sowka M (ed) (1980) National Association of Insurance Commissioners: malpractice claims: final compilation. National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Brookfield, WI

  15. Blais R, Tamblyn R, Bartlett G, Tre G, St-Germain D (2004) Incidence d’évènements indésirables dans les hôpitaux québécois. Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé. Université de Montréal. http://www.gris.umontreal.ca/rapportpdf/R04-06.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2005

  16. Helmrich RL (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. BMJ 320:781–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Calland JF, Adams RB, Benjamin DK Jr, O’Connor MJ, Chandrasekhara V, Guerlain S, Jones RS (2002) Thirty-day postoperative death rate at an academic medical center. Ann Surg 235:690–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Hanegem N, Kievit J (2005) Effectiveness of routine reporting to identify minor and serious adverse outcomes in surgical patients. Qual Saf Health Care 14:378–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beckmann U, Bohringer C, Carless R, Gillies DM, Runciman WB, Wu AW, Pronovost P (2003) Evaluation of two methods for quality improvement in intensive care: facilitated incident monitoring and retrospective medical chart review. Crit Care Med 31:1006–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feldman L, Barkun J, Barkun A, Sampalis J, Rosenberg L (1997) Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds. Surgery 122:711–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamby LS, Birkmeyer JD, Birkmeyer C, Alksnitis JA, Ryder L, Dow R (2000) Using prospective outcomes data to improve morbidity and mortality conferences. Curr Surg 57:384–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Proctor ML, Pastore J, Gerstle JT, Langer JC (2003) Incidence of medical error and adverse outcomes on a pediatric general surgery service. J Pediatr Surg 38:1361–1365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsaseng T, Moodley J (2005) Adverse events in gynaecology at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, South Africa. J Obstet Gynaecol 25:676–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lefevre F, Feinglass J, Potts S, Soglin L, Yarnold P, Martin GJ, Webster JR (1992) Iatrogenic complications in high-risk, elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 152:2074–2080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW (2003) The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 138:161–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Forster AJ, Asmis TR, Clark HD, Al Saied G, Code CC, Caughey SC, Baker K, Watters J, Worthington J, van Walraven C (2004) Ottawa Hospital Patient Safety Study: incidence and timing of adverse events in patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital. CMAJ 170:1235–1240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, Etchells E, Ghali WA, Hebert P, Majumdar SR, O’Beirne M, Palacios-Derflingher L, Reid RJ, Sheps S, Tamblyn R (2004) The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 170:1678–1686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Osmon S, Harris CB, Dunagan WC, Prentice D, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2004) Reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med 32:727–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R, Ali W, Scott A, Schug S (2002) Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact. N Z Med J 115:U271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Veen MR, Lardenoye JW, Kastelein GW, Breslau PJ (1999) Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice. Eur J Surg 165:421–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas EJ, Brennan TA (2000) Incidence and types of preventable adverse events in elderly patients: population based review of medical records. BMJ 320:741–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Parsons HM (1974) What happened at Hawthorne? Science 183:922–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wolff AM, Bourke J (2002) Detecting and reducing adverse events in an Australian rural base hospital emergency department using medical record screening and review. Emerg Med J 19:35–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320:768–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pere Rebasa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rebasa, P., Mora, L., Luna, A. et al. Continuous Monitoring of Adverse Events: Influence on the Quality of Care and the Incidence of Errors in General Surgery. World J Surg 33, 191–198 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9848-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9848-6

Keywords

Navigation