Skip to main content
Log in

Pilot Postoperative Ileus Study of Escin in Cancer Patients After Colorectal Surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative ileus, a common complication in patients after abdominal surgery, brings no benefit to the recovery of postoperative patients, and treatment targeted at restoring gastrointestinal motility may shorten the hospital stay. Studies have shown that escin accelerates gastrointestinal transit in mice and improves gastrointestinal motility in patients after abdominal surgery. A pilot study of escin’s effect on the recovery of gastrointestinal motility was conducted in colorectal cancer patients in anticipation of a multiple-center randomized controlled trial.

Methods

A total of 72 postoperative colorectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to four parallel groups on the basis of sealed envelopes—escin 5 mg group (E5 mg), escin 15 mg group (E15 mg), escin 25 mg group (E25 mg), and placebo group—with 18 patients in each group. Escin or placebo was diluted in 500 ml 5% dextrose injection, which was given once daily through the subclavian vein. The first injection took place 6 h after completion of the surgery. The treatment continued for 7 days or stopped at the time of the patient’s first bowel movement. Time to recovery of passage of gas (TRPG), time to recovery of gastrointestinal sounds (TRGS), and time to recovery of bowel movements (TRBM) were recorded to evaluate the efficacy of escin.

Results

The TRPGs of the three escin treatment groups were 76.78 + 28.81 h (E5 mg), 72.06 + 14.65 h (E15 mg), and 65.50 + 26.70 h (E25 mg), respectively, with differences of 6.03 ± 7.64 h (p = 0.436; E5 mg), 10.75 ± 4.92 h (p = 0.036; E15 mg), and 17.31 ± 7.20 h (p = 0.022; E25 mg) compared with the placebo group. The TRGSs of the three escin treatment groups were 45.28 ± 26.15 h (E5 mg), 41.22 ± 16.98 h (E15 mg), and 40.33 ± 14.09 h (E25 mg), respectively, with differences of 4.33 ± 7.12 h (p = 0.547; E5 mg), 8.39 ± 5.36 h (p = 0.127; E15 mg), and 9.28 ± 4.87 h (p = 0.065; E25 mg) compared with the placebo group. The TRBMs of the three escin treatment groups were 89.25 ± 23.77 h (E5 mg), 84.83 ± 27.91 h (E15 mg), and 84.44 ± 19.74 h (E25 mg), respectively, with differences of 19.03 ± 10.13 h (p = 0.069; E5 mg), 23.44 ± 10.70 h (= 0.035; E15 mg), and 23.83 ± 9.63 h (p = 0.019; E25 mg) compared with the placebo group.

Conclusion

The results of this pilot Postoperative Ileus Study of Escin (PISE) showed that escin can shorten the time to recovery of gastrointestinal motility in cancer patients after colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holte K, Kehlet H (2000) Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 87:1480–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miedema BW, Johnson JO (2003) Methods for decreasing postoperative gut dysmotility. Lancet Oncol 4:365–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baig MK, Wexner SD (2004) Postoperative ileus: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 47:516–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillaume M, Padioleau F (1994) Veinotonic effect, vascular protection, antiinflammatory and free radical scavenging properties of horse chestnut extract. Arzneimittelforschung 44:25–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang DC, Yang HL (2004) A randomized controlled trial of escin in patients after surgery of lumber disc herniation. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord 40:617–618

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan WC, Gao KS (2005) A randomized, controlled trial of escin for the treatment of acute cerebral infarction in senior patients. Chin J Gerontol 25:272–273

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong GX, Wang ZG, Liang FQ et al (2003) The effect of escin on chronic venous insufficiency: a randomized controlled multi-centered clinical trial. Chin J Gen Surg 18:206–208

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuda H, Li Y, Yoshikawa M (2000) Possible involvement of dopamine and dopamine2 receptors in the inhibitions of gastric emptying by escin Ib in mice. Life Sci 67:2921–2927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuda H, Li Y, Yoshikawa M (2000) Roles of endogenous prostaglandins and nitric oxide in inhibitions of gastric emptying and accelerations of gastrointestinal transit by escins Ia, Ib, IIa, and IIb in mice. Life Sci 66:PL41–PL46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuda H, Li Y, Yoshikawa M (1999) Effects of escins Ia, Ib, IIa, and IIb from horse chestnuts on gastrointestinal transit and ileus in mice. Bioorg Med Chem 7:1737–1741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuda H, Li Y, Yoshikawa M (2000) Possible involvement of 5-HT and 5-HT2 receptors in acceleration of gastrointestinal transit by escin Ib in mice. Life Sci 66:2233–2238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu FH, Hou YZ, Jiang WL et al (2005) Escin: inhibiting inflammation and promoting gastrointestinal transit to attenuate formation of postoperative adhesions. World J Surg 29:1614–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hellerg K, Ruschewski W, De Vivie R (1975) Drug induced acute renal failure after heart surgery. Thoraxchirurgie 23:396–399

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holte K, Kehlet H (2000) Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 87:1480–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown TA, McDonald J, Williard W (1999) A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of cisapride after colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 177:399–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lander A, Redkar R, Nicholls G et al (1997) Cisapride reduces neonatal postoperative ileus: randomized placebo controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 77:F119–F122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP et al (1995) A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sagar PM, Kruegener G, MacFie J (1992) Nasogastric intubation and elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 79:1127–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao SS, Beaty J, Chamberlain M et al (1999) Effects of acute graded exercise on human colonic motility. Am J Physiol 276:G1221–G1226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldhausen JH, Schirmer BD (1990) The effect of ambulation on recovery from postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 212:671–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen C, Glaszious P, Del Mar C (1999) Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet 354:1229–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schilder JM, Hurteau JA, Look KY et al (1997) A prospective controlled trial of early postoperative oral intake following majaor abdominal gynecologic surgery. Gymecol Oncol 67:235–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart BT, Woods RJ, Collopy BT et al (1998) Early feeding after elective open colorectal resections:a prospective randomized trial. Aust N Z Surg 68:125–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Helslin MJ, Latkany L, Leung D et al (1997) A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Ann Surg 226:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Watters JM, Kirkpatrick SM, Norris SB (1997) Immediate postoperative enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. Ann Surg 226:369–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tonini M, De Ponti F, Di Nucci A et al (1999) Review article: cardiac adverse effects of gastrointestinal prokinetics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:1585–1591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonacini M, Quiason S, Reynolds M et al (1993) Effect of intravenous erythromycin on postoperative ileus. Am J Gastroenterol 88:208–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang MY, Li HC, Shi HP (1999) Experimental research on prevention of postoperative intestinal adhesion by sodium aescinate. Chin J Surg Integrated Traditional Western Med 5:382–384

    Google Scholar 

  29. Castedal M, Bjornsson E, Abrahamsson H (2000) Effects of midazolam on small bowel motility in humans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14:571–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang SJ, Tsai SC, Lin WY et al (2000) A simple method for preparing radioactive capsules in colon transit study. Eur J Nucl Med 27:857–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Altman DG, Bland JM (1995) Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ 311:485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shakespeare TP, Gebski VJ, Veness MJ et al (2001) Improving interpretation of clinical studies by use of confidence levels, clinical significance curves, and risk-benefit contours. Lancet 357:1349–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li BH, Zhang J, Huang RZ et al (2006) Effect of pH adjustment of intravenous injection of sodium aescinate after addition of sodium bicarbonate to prevent phlebitis. Zhonghua Hu Li Za Zhi 41:113–115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the participating investigators and their staff at the two study centers. The contributions of Dr. Peng Guo, Dr. Kai Shen, and Dr. Deepak Singh Mouni are much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, Q., Zong, X., Ge, B. et al. Pilot Postoperative Ileus Study of Escin in Cancer Patients After Colorectal Surgery. World J Surg 33, 348–354 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9816-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9816-1

Keywords

Navigation