Abstract
Background
The morbidity and mortality of anastomotic complications after esophagectomy have gradually decreased in recent years. However, swallowing difficulties and reflux continue to burden patients jeopardizing their quality of life. In the present study we performed endoscopic evaluation of the outcomes of esophagogastrostomy by analyzing the presence of anastomotic stenosis and reflux esophagitis.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was carried out on 74 patients who underwent esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy by one surgeon between January 1995 and December 2004. Fifty-three patients had an endoscopic examination during follow-up (29 ± 23.6 months, range = 5–111 months). Reflux esophagitis and stenosis at the anastomostic site were analyzed according to the surgical technique used and the location of the esophagogastrostomy.
Results
The mean age at the time of repair was 60.3 ± 8.87 (range = 39–81) years. Cervical anastomosis was performed in 26 patients and intrathoracic anastomosis in 27 patients. No significant statistical difference in the frequency of anastomotic stenosis was observed between the two groups (p = 0.829); reflux esophagitis was noted in three patients in the cervical anastomosis group and in 14 patients in the intrathoracic anastomosis group (p = 0.041). For all patients, 23 received a hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis and 30 a circular stapled one. There was no significant statistical difference in anastomotic stenosis (p = 0.689) and reflux esophagitis (p = 0.879) in comparisons between the two groups.
Conclusion
Cervical anastomosis resulted in a better outcome for esophagogastrostomy by lowering the risk of reflux esophagitis; this outcome might improve the patient’s quality of life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, van Raemdonck D (2002) Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg 19:92–98
Yuasa N, Sasaki E, Ikeyama T, Miyake H, Nimura Y (2005) Acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1021–1027
Dresner SM, Griffin SM, Wayman J, Bennett MK, Hayes N, Raimes SA (2003) Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett’s metaplasia. Br J Surg 90:1120–1128
Aly A, Jamieson GG (2004) Reflux after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 91:137–141
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (2000) Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:277–288
Trentino P, Pompeo E, Nofroni I et al (1997) Predictive value of early postoperative esophagoscopy for occurrence of benign stenosis after cervical esophagogastrostomy. Endoscopy 29:840–844
Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL et al (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92
Shibuya S, Fukudo S, Shineha R et al (2003) High incidence of reflux esophagitis observed by routine endoscopic examination after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. World J Surg 27:580–583
Borst HG, Dragojevic D, Stegmann T, Hetzer R (1978) Anastomotic leakage, stenosis, and reflux after esophageal replacement. World J Surg 2:861–864
Bemelman WA, Verburg J, Brummelkamp WH, Klopper PJ (1988) A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach. Am J Physiol 254:G168–G175
Cassivi SD (2004) Leaks, strictures, and necrosis: a review of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 16:124–132
Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee JM, Lee YC (2004) Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:1097–1101
Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, Evans K, Inculet R, Nelems B (1992) Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg 163:484–489
Honkoop P, Siersema PD, Tilanus HW, Stassen LP, Hop WC, van Blankenstein M (1996) Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:1141–1146; discussion 1147–1148
Raz DJ, Tedesco P, Herbella FA, Nipomnick I, Way LW, Patti MG (2008) Side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis reduces the incidence of leaks and stenosis. Dis Esophagus 21:69–72
Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young JE (2001) Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus 14:212–217
Beitler AL, Urschel JD (1998) Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses. Am J Surg 175:337–340
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H.K., Choi, Y.H., Shim, J.H. et al. Endoscopic Evaluation of the Quality of the Anastomosis After Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction. World J Surg 32, 2010–2014 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9664-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9664-z