Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Edmondson-Steiner Grading Increases the Predictive Efficiency of TNM Staging for Long-term Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The 6th edition TNM staging (TNM-6) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been recommended. However, its superiority, in contrast to the previous 5th edition (TNM-5), has not been fully recognized. Besides, tumor differentiation was not included. The current study was designed to compare the value of these two staging systems and, more importantly, to elucidate whether Edmondson-Steiner grading, a well-acknowledged histological classification, is helpful in further discriminating different prognosis of HCC.

Methods

Prospectively collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of consecutive 171 patients with HCC undergoing curative hepatic resection (CHR) were reviewed retrospectively. The impacts of variables on survival were determined by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

Results

The differences of survival between stages of the TNM-6 and TNM-5 were almost significant, except for disease-free survival for TNM-5. Moreover, TNM-6 might be a more powerful prognostic predictor compared with TNM-5, although their impacts on survival were all not independent, unlike Edmondson-Steiner grading. For patients with each stage of TNM-6, Edmondson-Steiner grade was the sole significant variable in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Finally, a novel scoring criteria (prognostic scoring for CHR, PSCHR) integrating Edmondson-Steiner grading and TNM-6 was attempted and statistically shown to be of independent significance and stronger predicting value for prognosis of curatively resected HCC.

Conclusion

TNM-6 revealed to be more significantly prognostic than TNM-5 in patients with HCC after curative hepatic resection. Edmondson-Steiner grading could raise the predictive efficiency of TNM-6 for postresectional survival of patients with HCC. Therefore, PSCHR containing Edmondson-Steiner grading was preliminarily proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J (1993) Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer 54:594–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J (1999) Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 83:18–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Primack A, Vogel CL, Kyalwazi SK, Ziegler JL, Simon R, Anthony PP (1975) A staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic factors in Ugandan patients. Cancer 35:1357–1364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H et al (1985) Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer 56:918–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators (1998) A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients. Hepatology 28:751–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung TW, Tang AM, Zee B et al (2002) Construction of the Chinese University Prognostic Index for hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison with the TNM staging system, the Okuda staging system, and the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program staging system: a study based on 926 patients. Cancer 94:1760–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudo M, Chung H, Osaki Y (2003) Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan integrated staging score (JIS score). J Gastroenterol 38:207–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleming I, Cooper J, Hensen D (1997) Liver AJCC cancer staging manual. 5th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang YH, Chen CH, Chang TT et al (2005) Evaluation of predictive value of CLIP, Okuda, TNM and JIS staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farinati F, Rinaldi M, Gianni S, Naccarato R (2000) How should patients with hepatocellular carcinoma be staged? Validation of a new prognostic system. Cancer 89:2266–2273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous (2002) Liver including intrahepatic bile ducts. In: Greene F, Page D, Fleming I (eds) American Joint Committee on cancer staging manual. 6th edn. Springer, New York, pp 131–144

  14. Vauthey JN, Lauwers GY, Esnaola NF et al (2002) Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:1527–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lei HJ, Chau GY, Lui WY et al (2006) Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 203:426–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Cautero N et al (2005) Prognostic evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 112 cirrhotic patients resected for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 12:289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Varotti G, Ramacciato G, Ercolani G et al (2005) Comparison between the fifth and sixth editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentric study on 393 cirrhotic resected patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:760–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kee KM, Wang JH, Lee CM et al (2007) Validation of clinical AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 5,613 cases from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Int J Cancer 120:2650–2655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, Yamaoka Y, Makuuchi M (2007) Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 245:909–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Qiang L, Huikai L, Butt K, Wang PP, Hao X (2006) Factors associated with disease survival after surgical resection in Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 30:439–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah SA, Greig PD, Gallinger S et al (2006) Factors associated with early recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 202:275–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martins A, Cortez-Pinto H, Marques-Vidal P et al (2006) Treatment and prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 26:680–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanigawa N, Lu C, Mitsui T, Miura S (1997) Quantitation of sinusoid-like vessels in hepatocellular carcinoma: its clinical and prognostic significance. Hepatology 26:1216–1223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Horigome H, Nomura T, Saso K, Itoh M (1999) Standards for selecting percutaneous ethanol injection therapy or percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma: consideration of local recurrence. Am J Gastroenterol 94:1914–1917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamura S, Kato T, Berho M et al (2001) Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation. Arch Surg 136:25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Si MS, Amersi F, Golish SR et al (2003) Prevalence of metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors and impact on survival. Am Surg 69:879–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roayaie S, Schwartz JD, Sung MW et al (2004) Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplant: patterns and prognosis. Liver Transpl 10:534–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC (2004) Radiofrequency ablation improves prognosis compared with ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤4 cm. Gastroenterology 127:1714–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kubo S, Tanaka H, Shuto T et al (2005) Clinicopathologic features and outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with concurrent versus previous chronic hepatitis B. Surg Today 35:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC (2005) Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Gut 54:1151–1156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Qian YB, Zhang JB, Wu WZ et al (2006) P48 is a predictive marker for outcome of postoperative interferon-alpha treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus infection-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 107:1562–1569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou L, Rui JA, Wang SB et al (2003) Multi-modal serial therapy for primary liver cancer in senile patients: a report of 153 cases. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 25:404–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Qu Q, Rui JA, Wang SB et al (2006) Comparison of different clinical staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 28:155–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou L, Rui JA, Wang SB et al (2006) Clinicopathological features, post-surgical survival and prognostic indicators of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:767–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou L, Rui JA, Wang SB et al (2007) Factors predictive for long-term survival of male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. J Surg Oncol 95:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou L, Rui JA, Wang SB et al (2007) Outcomes and prognostic factors of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radical major hepatectomy. World J Surg 31:1782–1787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Edmondson HA, Steiner PE (1954) Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer 7:462–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Suehiro T, Matsumata T, Itasaka H, Yamamoto K, Kawahara N, Sugimachi K (1995) Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of resected hepatocellular carcinomas of varied sizes with special reference to proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Cancer 76:399–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen TW, Chu CM, Yu JC et al (2007) Comparison of clinical staging systems in predicting survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving major or minor hepatectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:480–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zavaglia C, De Carlis L, Alberti AB et al (2005) Predictors of long-term survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2708–2716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wada H, Nagano H, Yamamoto H et al (2006) Expression pattern of angiogenic factors and prognosis after hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: importance of angiopoietin-2 and hypoxia-induced factor-1 alpha. Liver Int 26:414–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Oishi K, Itamoto T, Amano H et al (2007) Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 95:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Le Treut YP, Hardwigsen J, Ananian P et al (2006) Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the major vasculature. A European case-control series. J Gastrointest Surg 10:855–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all of the colleagues of the Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, who took part in determination of Edmondson-Steiner grading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100032, China

    Li Zhou, Jing-An Rui, Shao-Bin Wang, Shu-Guang Chen & Qiang Qu

  2. Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100032, China

    Da-Xiong Ye

Authors
  1. Li Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing-An Rui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Da-Xiong Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shao-Bin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shu-Guang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qiang Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, L., Rui, JA., Ye, DX. et al. Edmondson-Steiner Grading Increases the Predictive Efficiency of TNM Staging for Long-term Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection. World J Surg 32, 1748–1756 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9615-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9615-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation