Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Application of Layered Anastomosis During Esophagogastrostomy

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the operative results in regard to reducing anastomotic leakage and stricture formation using a newly designed layered manual esophagogastric anastomosis versus a stapler esophagogastrostomy versus the conventional hand-sewn whole-layer anastomosis after resection for esophageal or gastric cardiac carcinoma. From January 2004 to September 2006, a total of 1024 patients with esophageal or gastric cardia carcinoma underwent a layered esophagogastric anastomosis with the assistance of a three-leaf clipper in a single university medical center. The mucosal layers of the esophagus and stomach were sutured continuously with 4/0 Vicryl plus antibacterial suture (polyglyconate). From May 2002 to December 2003, there were also 170 patients and 69 patients who underwent stapler and conventional whole-layer anastomosis, respectively; they served as control groups. The results were analyzed retrospectively. The operative mortality rate was 0.7% in the layered group compared to 5.9% and 7.2% for the stapler group and the whole-layer group (p < 0.01), The anastomotic leakage rates were 0%, 3.5%, and 5.8% for the layered group, stapler group, and whole-layer group, respectively (p < 0.01). All patients were followed postoperatively. Six patients in the layered group (0.6%) developed mild stricture formation compared to 16 patients in stapled group (9.9%) and 5 patients in the conventional whole-layer group (7.8%) (p < 0.01). The application of layered esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture after esophagectomy compared with the stapler and whole-layer manual anastomoses. It is easy to apply and could be used as an alternative for esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for esophageal or cardiac carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bardini R, Asolati M, Ruol A, et al. (1994) Anastomosis. World J Surg 18:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beitler AL, Urschel JD (1998) Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses. Am J Surg 175:337–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, et al. (1997) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 226:169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, et al. (2004) Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:1097–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie CH, Zhao YF, Kou YL, et al. (2004) The experimental study on the healing quality of the stoma in esophagogastrostomy by layering anastomosis. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:261–263

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, et al. (1990) Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 77:845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell JD (2006) Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 16:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, et al. (2005) Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:623–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bordini R, Bonavina L, Asolati M, et al. (1994) Single-layered cervical esophageal anastomosis: a prospective study of two suturing techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 58:1087–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steichen FM, Ravitch MM (1980) Mechanical sutures in esophageal surgery. Ann Surg 191:373–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong J, Cheng H, Liu R, et al. (1987) Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture. Surgery 101:408–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berrisford RG, Page RD, Donnelly RJ (1996) Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:142–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshiyuki F, Nobuyoshi H, Katsuya H, et al. (2005) Usefulness of automatic triangular anastomosis for esophageal cancer surgery using a linear stapler (TA-30). Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aiko S, Ando N, Shinozawa Y, et al. (1993) Increased chemiluminescence and ulcer development in the low blood flowed state of the gastric tube for esophageal replacement. J Clin Gastroenterol 17:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xie CH, Yan Q, Zhao YF, et al. (2002) Esophageal bacteria research among sufferers of esophagus carcinoma in Sichuan Province China. Sichuan Med Magazine 23:369–370

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang DB, chief translator (2000) Christopher Textbook of Surgery. 15th edition. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, pp 163–175

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao YF, Wan ZB, Wu C, et al. (1997) Gastric and esophageal episode after esophagus carcinoma resection. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 4:139–140

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pierie JP, De Graaf PW, Peon H, et al. (1994) Impaired healing of cervical esophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by Doppler flowmetry. Eur J Surg 160:599–603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bardini R, Bonavinal L, Asolati M, et al. (1994) Single-layered cervical esophageal anastomosis: a prospective study of two suturing techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 58:1087–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grau JM, Crespo M, Docobo F, et al. (2007) Prevention of surgical infection using reabsorbable antibacterial suture (Vicryl Plus) versus reabsorbable conventional suture in hernioplasty: an experimental study in animals. Cir Esp 81:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, et al. (2001) Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 71:419–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Orringer MB, Becky M, Mark DI (2000) Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis [abstract]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:277–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Fan Zhao.

Additional information

This abstract was accepted as a free paper and oral presentation at International Surgical Week 2007, Abstract 320, Montreal, Canada, August 2007

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, ZJ., Zhao, YF., Chen, LQ. et al. Clinical Application of Layered Anastomosis During Esophagogastrostomy. World J Surg 32, 583–588 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9396-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9396-5

Keywords

Navigation