Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Three-Dimensional Vision in Laparoscopic Training

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Simulators are being used to teach laparoscopic skills before residents get to the operating room. It is unknown whether the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision will facilitate laparoscopic training. Therefore, our objective was to compare the effectiveness of using 3D imaging over the traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging to teach laparoscopic simulator skills to novice individuals and assess whether 3D imaging ameliorates laparoscopic performance for surgeons who have already adapted to working within a 2D surgical environment.

Methods

This prospective study involved 36 surgical residents and students. Inexperienced participants included medical students and first- and second-year surgical residents (n = 25). Experienced participants included third- and fifth-year surgical residents (n = 11). Participants were tested on six laparoscopic skills using 2D or 3D imaging systems and then retested about 3 months later using the opposing imaging system. Evaluation of performance was based on the time elapsed to task completion and the errors committed during that time.

Results

The experienced participants performed better than the inexperienced participants regardless of the imaging system. Inexperienced participants initially tested using 2D imaging required significantly more time and/or made more errors to complete five of the six laparoscopic tasks compared to those initially tested using 3D imaging (p < 0.05). After initial testing on 3D imaging, inexperienced participants retested using 2D imaging performed significantly better on five of six tasks compared to the scores of inexperienced participants initially tested on 2D imaging (p < 0.05). In contrast, the inexperienced participants’ retested on 3D after initial 2D imaging did not improve on any laparoscopic task compared to the scores of inexperienced participants initially tested on 3D imaging. Among the experienced participants, no significant difference in time or errors to task completion was observed under 2D imaging compared to 3D imaging during the first or second testing session.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that 3D imaging offers significant advantages in the teaching of laparoscopic skills to inexperienced individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, et al. (1999) The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13:1087–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perkins N, Starkes JL, Lee TD, et al. (2002) Learning to use minimal access surgical instruments and 2-dimensional remote visual feedback: how difficult is the task for novices? Adv Health Sci Educ 7:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Risucci D, Geiss A, Gellman L, et al. (2001) Surgeon-specific factors in the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 181:289–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Windsor JA, Zoha F (2005) The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees: testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills. Surg Endosc 19:1058–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, et al. (1997) Comparison of two dimensional vs. three dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomsen MN, Lang RD (2004) An experimental comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model. Arthroscopy 20:419–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McDougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS Jr, et al. (1996) Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 10:371–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peitgen K, Walz MV, Walz MV, et al. (1996) A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2000) Influence of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging on endoscopic bowel suturing. World J Surg 24:444–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhayani SB, Andriole GL (2005) Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills? An assessment of 3D head-mounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7:211–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK, et al. (2000) Assessment of a three dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, et al. (2007) Three dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193:519–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Powers TW, Bentrem DJ, Nagle AP, et al. (2005) Hand dominance and performance in a laparoscopic skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 19:673–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, et al. (2003) Impact of hand dominance, gender and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:1082–1085

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reed JF (2004) Analysis of two treatment, two period cross trials in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 43:54–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, et al. (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Everbusch A, Grantcharov TP (2004) Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 18:1514–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraser SA, Freldman LS, Stanbridge D, et al. (2005) Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill. Surg Endosc 19:1572–1578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees B, et al. (1001) The role of the basic surgical skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 15:1071–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomized study of the influence of two dimensional versus three dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Viking Systems (La Jolla, CA, USA) for allowing us to use their 3Di Digital Visual System for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles F. Bellows.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Votanopoulos, K., Brunicardi, F.C., Thornby, J. et al. Impact of Three-Dimensional Vision in Laparoscopic Training. World J Surg 32, 110–118 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9253-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9253-6

Keywords

Navigation