Abstract
Background
Gastroesophageal reflux is the main risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, but there is no strong support for a protective effect of antireflux surgery. We tested the hypothesis that esophageal adenocarcinoma that develops with long latency after antireflux surgery might be due to persistent postoperative reflux.
Methods
A nationwide population-based case-control study in collaboration with 195 relevant Swedish hospital departments and tumor registries during the study period 1995–1997. Frequency-matched control persons were randomly selected from the population register. All study participants were personally interviewed regarding background data, exposures, symptoms, conditions, diseases, surgery, and medications. Differences between cases and controls in the occurrence of daily, long-standing antireflux medication 5 years or later after antireflux surgery were estimated using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
One hundred and eighty-nine out of 216 (88%) eligible cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma and 820 of 1,128 (73%) controls were prospectively enrolled. Seven (3.7%) patients and 8 controls had undergone antireflux surgery at least 5 years before the interview. All 7 case patients had Barrett’s mucosa. Four of the case patients had used postoperative antireflux medications continuously (mean duration 10.2 years), while none of the control persons reported such use (P = 0.026). There was no difference in mean body mass index between patients with and without postoperative reflux (P = 0.81). No differences between the patients and controls were found regarding age, sex, body mass index, or tobacco smoking status.
Conclusions
Esophageal adenocarcinoma occurring late after antireflux surgery might at least partly be due to persistent postoperative reflux. Further research is required to establish the role of antireflux surgery in the etiology of this tumor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW, et al. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 1991;265(10):1287–1289
Chow WH, Finkle WD, et al. The relation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 1995;274(6):474–477
Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340(11):825–831
Spechler SJ. Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;346(11):836–842
Shaheen N, Ransohoff DF. Gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal cancer: scientific review. JAMA 2002;287(15):1972–1981
Csendes A, Burdiles P, Braghetto I, et al. Adenocarcinoma appearing very late after antireflux surgery for Barrett’s esophagus: long-term follow-up, review of the literature, and addition of six patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8(4):434–441
Corey KE, Schmitz SM, Shaheen NJ et al. Does a surgical antireflux procedure decrease the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98(11):2390–2394
Ye W, Chow WH, Lagergren J, et al. Risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseases and after antireflux surgery. Gastroenterology 2001;121(6):1286–1293
Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, et al. Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285(18):2331–2338
Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Adami HO, et al. Association between medications that relax the lower esophageal sphincter and risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med 2000;133(3):165–175
Brand DL, Ylvisaker JT, Gelfand M, et al. Regression of columnar esophageal (Barrett’s) epithelium after anti-reflux surgery. N Engl J Med 1980;302(15):844–848
Oberg S, Wenner J, Johansson J, et al. Barrett esophagus: risk factors for progression to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2005;242(1):49–54
Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, et al. Clinical and pathologic response of Barrett’s esophagus to laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 2003;238(4):458–464; discussion 464–456
Desai KM, Soper NJ, Frisella MM, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Surg 2003;186(6):652–659
Spechler SJ. Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326(12):786–792
Fitzgerald RC, Omary MB, Triadafilopoulos G. Dynamic effects of acid on Barrett’s esophagus. An ex vivo proliferation and differentiation model. J Clin Invest 1996;98(9):2120–2128
Ouatu-Lascar R, Fitzgerald RC, Triadafilopoulos G. Differentiation and proliferation in Barrett’s esophagus and the effects of acid suppression. Gastroenterology 1999;117(2):327–335
Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Hyrin O. Association between body mass and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Intern Med 1999; 9(4):369–378
Chow WH, Blot WJ, Vaughan TL, et al. Body mass index and risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90(2):150–155
Nilsson M, Johnsen R, Ye W, et al. Obesity and estrogen as risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. JAMA 2003;290(1):66–72
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by the Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lagergren, J., Viklund, P. Is Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Occurring Late After Antireflux Surgery Due to Persistent Postoperative Reflux?. World J. Surg. 31, 465–469 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0386-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0386-9