Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Differences between Male and Female Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of laparoscopy in the management of patients with suspected acute appendicitis remains controversial. It has been suggested that laparoscopy is useful mainly in young women of reproductive age because of the high incidence of wrong diagnosis in these patients.

Methods

Different management protocols for patients with suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively used in male and female patients; women of reproductive age were treated laparoscopically, while men were randomised to open or laparoscopic appendectomy.

Results

From September 2002 to September 2005, 132 patients—54 women and 78 men—with suspected acute appendicitis were treated according to the protocol. The incidence of wrong diagnosis in female patients was high (26% and the conversion rate low (5.5%). In contrast, in the laparoscopic male subgroup, these rates showed a reverse relationship (5.2% and 18.5%, respectively). Morbidity did not differ between female and male patients or between the 2 arms of the male group. Laparoscopic appendectomy took longer to perform without affecting significantly the needs for postoperative analgesia, the duration of hospital stay and the time to return to normal activities when compared with open appendectomy in men.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic appendectomy is at least as safe as the open procedure in the male population, although it does not appear to offer any obvious advantage over the open procedure. The diagnostic advantage that laparoscopy offers to fertile women makes the procedure attractive for this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystctomy. Am J Surg 1993;165:390–397

    Google Scholar 

  2. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:545–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 1992;112:497–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219:725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 1995;169:208–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 1996;20:263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc 1997;11:95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 1993;342:633–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, et al. Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 1995;222:256–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, et al. Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 1996;120:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Henle K, Beller S, Rechner J, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 1996;67:526–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 1997;132:708–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(4):CD 001546

  14. Jadallah FA, Abdul-Ghani AA, Tibblin S. Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile woman. Eur J Surg 1994;160:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cox MR, McCall JL, Padbury RTA, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in women with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Med J Aust 1995;162 (3):130–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, et al. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc 2001;15:200–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berry J Jr, Malt RA. Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg 1984;200:567–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 2004;18:969–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vasquez-Frias JA, et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 2006;20:717–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau W, Fan ST, Yiu T, et al. The clinical significance of routine histopathologic study of the resected appendix and safety of appendiceal inversion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986;162:256–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Sebastano P, Fink T, di Mola FF, et al. Neuroimmune appendicitis. Lancet 1999;354:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, et al. A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 2001;88:251–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece

    George Tzovaras MD, Paraskevi Liakou MD, Ioannis Baloyiannis MD, Michael Spyridakis MD, Fotios Mantzos MD, Konstantinos Tepetes MD, Evaghelos Athanassiou MD & Constantine Hatzitheofilou MD

  2. The Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, 19 Agorogianni A. Street, 413 35, Larissa, Greece

    George Tzovaras MD

Authors
  1. George Tzovaras MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paraskevi Liakou MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ioannis Baloyiannis MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Spyridakis MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fotios Mantzos MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Konstantinos Tepetes MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Evaghelos Athanassiou MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Constantine Hatzitheofilou MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Tzovaras MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzovaras, G., Liakou, P., Baloyiannis, I. et al. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Differences between Male and Female Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis. World J. Surg. 31, 409–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0335-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0335-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation