Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Groin Hernia Repair: Open Techniques

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the introduction of the Bassini method in 1887, more than 70 types of pure tissue repair have been reported in the surgical literature. An unacceptable recurrence rate and prolonged postoperative pain and recovery time after tissue repair along with our understanding of the metabolic origin of inguinal hernias led to the concept of tension-free hernioplasty with mesh. Currently, the main categories of inguinal hernia repair are the open repairs and the laparoscopic repairs. In the open category, repair of the hernia is achieved by pure tissue approximation or by tension-free mesh repair. The most commonly performed tissue repairs are those of Bassini, Shouldice, and to a lesser extent McVay. In the tension-free mesh repair category, the mesh is placed in front of the transversalis fascia, such as with the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty, or behind the transversalis fascia in the preperitoneal space, such as during the Nyhus, Rives, Read, Stoppa, Wantz, and Kugel procedures. Numerous comparative randomized trials have clearly demonstrated the superiority of the tension-free mesh repair over the traditional tissue approximation method. Placing mesh behind the transversalis fascia, although a sound concept, requires extensive dissection in the highly complex preperitoneal space and can lead to injury of the pelvic structures, major hematoma formation, or both. In addition, according to the prospective randomized comparative study of mesh placement in front of versus behind the transversalis fascia, the latter offers no advantage over the former, and it is more difficult to perform, learn, and teach. More importantly, preperitoneal mesh implantation (via open and laparoscopic procedure) leads to obliteration of the spaces of Retzius and Bogros, making certain vascular and urologic procedures, in particular radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection, extremely difficult if not impossible. In conclusion, according to level A evidence from randomized comparative studies, (1) mesh repair is superior to pure tissue approximation repairs, and (2) mesh implantation in front of the transversalis fascia is superior, safer, and easier than open or laparoscopic mesh implantation behind the transversalis fascia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read RC. A review: the role of protease-antiprotease imbalance in the pathogenesis of herniation and abdominal aortic aneurism in certain smokers. Postgrad. Gen. Surg. 1992;4:161–165

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosch R, Klinge U, Si Z, et al. A role for the collagen I/III and MMP-1/-13 genese in primary inguinal hernia? B.M.C. Med.Genet. 2002;3(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PM, et al. Long term followup (12-15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J. Am. Coll Surg. 1997;185:352–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGillicuddy JE. Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch. Surg. 1998;133:974–978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Danielsson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV. Randomized study of Lichtenstein compared with Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur. J. Surg. 1999;165:49–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair general surgical practice. Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:45–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nyhus LM. The preperitoneal approach and iliopubic tract repair of inguinal hernia. In: Nyhus LM, Condon RE (eds). Hernia, 3rd Edition, Philadelphia, Lippincott 1989;154–177

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1997;1:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, et al. Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1994;28:373–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sodji M, Rogier R, Durand-Fontanier S, et al. Composite, nonresorbable parietal prosthesis with polyethylene terepthalate-polyurethane (HI-TEX PARP NT): prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions; experimental study in rabbits. Ann. Chir. 2001;126:549–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belion JM, Bujan J, Contreras LA, et al. Use of nonporous polytetra fluoroethylene prosthesis in combination with polypropylene prosthetic abdominal wall implants in prevention of peritoneal adhesions J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998;38:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  12. Losanof JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: which prosthesis to choose? Surg. Endosc. 2002;16:1500–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Critical scrutiny of the open tension-free hernioplasty. Am. J. Surg. 1993;165:369–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzgibbons R. Management of an inguinal hernia: conventional? tension-free? laparoscopic? or maybe no treatment at all. Present to the General Sessions of the American College of Surgeons, 86th Annual Clinical Congress, 2000

  15. Kingsnorth AN, Bowley DMG, Porter C. A prospective study of 1000 hernias: results of the Plymouth Hernia Service. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2003;85:18–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amid PK. Lichtenstein tension-free hemioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia 2004;8:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drye JC. Intraperitoneal pressure in the human. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1948;87:472–475

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klinge U, Klosterehalfen B, Muller M, et al. Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur. J. Surg. 1998;164:965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amid PK. Radiologic images of meshoma: a new phenomenon after prosthetic repair of abdominal wall hernias. Arch. Surg. 2004;139:1297–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amid PK. Causes, prevention, and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy neuropathic inguinodynia: triple neurectomy with proximal end implantation. Hernia 2004;8:343–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lichtenstein IL, Shore JM. Simplified repair of femoral and recurrent inguinal hernias by a “plug” technic. Am. J. Surg. 1976;132:121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilbert AI. Sutureless repair of inguinal hernia. Am. J. Surg. 1992;163:331–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. “Tension-free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 1993;114:3–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kingsnorth AN, Hyland ME, Porter CA, et al. Prospective double-blind randomized study comparing Perfix plug-and-patch with Lichtenstein patch in inguinal hernia repair: one year quality of life results. Hernia 2000;4:255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dieter RA. Mesh plug migration into scrotum: a new complication of hernia repair. Int. Surg. 1999;84:57–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moorman ML, Price PD. Migrating mesh plug: complication of a well-established hernia repair technique. Am. Surg. 2004;70:298–299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chuback JA, Singh RS, Sills C, et al. Small bowel obstruction resulting from mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 2000;127:475–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muldoon RL, Marchant K, Johnson DD, et al. Lichtenstein versus anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial. Hernia 2004;8:98–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;250:1819–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Katz EE, Patel RV, Sokoloff MH, et al. Bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can complicate subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2002;167:637–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stoppa R, Diarra B, Verhaeghe P, et al. Some problems encountered at re-operation following repair of groin hernias with pre-peritoneal prostheses. Hernia 1998;2:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Borchers H, Brehmer B, van Poppel H, et al. Radical prostatectomy in patients with previous groin hernia repair using synthetic nonabsorbable mesh. Urol. Int. 2001;67:213–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pelissier EP, Blum D, Marre P, et al. Inguinal hernia: a patch covering only the myopectineal orifice is effective. Hernia 2001;5:84–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Foley CL, Kirby RS. Bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can complicate subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2003;169:1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cook IL, Afzal N, Cornaby AJ. Laparoscopic hernia repairs may make subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy more hazardous. B.J.U. Int. 2003;91:729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Houdelette P, Dumotier J, Berthod N, et al. Urological surgical effect of the repair of inguinal hernia using bilateral subperitoneal prosthetic mesh. Ann. Urol. 1991;25:138–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cooperberg MR, Downs IM, Carroll PR. Radical retropubic prostatectomy frustated by prior laparoscpic mesh herniorrhaphy. Surgery 2004;135:452–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liedberg F. Bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can complicate subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2002;168:661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA, Medical Center, 1000 West Carson St., Torrance, California 90509, USA

    Parviz K. Amid M.D.

  2. Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA

    Parviz K. Amid M.D.

Authors
  1. Parviz K. Amid M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parviz K. Amid M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amid, P.K. Groin Hernia Repair: Open Techniques. World J. Surg. 29, 1046–1051 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7967-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7967-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation