Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Number Needed to Treat (or Harm)

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of a treatment versus controls may be expressed in relative or absolute terms. For rational decision-making, absolute measures are more meaningful. The number needed to treat, the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction, is a powerful estimate of the effect of a treatment. It is particularly useful because it takes into account the underlying risk (what would happen without the intervention?). The number needed to treat tells us not only whether a treatment works but how well it works. Thus, it informs health care professionals about the effort needed to achieve a particular outcome. A number needed to treat should be accompanied by information about the experimental intervention, the control intervention against which the experimental intervention has been tested, the length of the observation period, the underlying risk of the study population, and an exact definition of the endpoint. A 95% confidence interval around the point estimate should be calculated. An isolated number needed to treat is rarely appropriate to summarize the usefulness of an intervention; multiple numbers needed to treat for benefit and harm are more helpful. Absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat should become standard summary estimates in randomized controlled trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RJ Cook DL Sackett (1995) ArticleTitleThe number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect B. M. J. 310 452–454

    Google Scholar 

  2. DL Sackett RB Haynes GH Guyatt et al. (1991) Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine EditionNumber2nd edition Little, Brown Boston

    Google Scholar 

  3. HJ McQuay RA Moore (1997) ArticleTitleUsing numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice Ann. Intern. Med. 126 712–720 Occurrence Handle9139558

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A Laupacis DL Sackett RS Roberts (1988) ArticleTitleAn assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment N. Engl. J. Med. 318 1728–1733 Occurrence Handle3374545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CM Rembold (1998) ArticleTitleNumber needed to screen: development of a statistic for disease screening B. M. J. 317 307–312

    Google Scholar 

  6. L Dumont C Mardirosoff MR Tramèr (2000) ArticleTitleEfficacy and harm of pharmacological prevention of acute mountain sickness: quantitative systematic review B. M. J. 321 267–272

    Google Scholar 

  7. D Altman (1998) ArticleTitleConfidence intervals for the number needed to treat B. M. J. 317 1309–1312

    Google Scholar 

  8. CD Naylor E Chen B Strauss (1992) ArticleTitleMeasured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness? Ann.Intern.Med. 117 916–921 Occurrence Handle1443954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. CR Lacy JA Barone DC Suh et al. (2001) ArticleTitleImpact of presentation of research results on likelihood of prescribing medications to patients with left ventricular dysfunction Am. J. Cardiol. 87 203–207 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01317-5 Occurrence Handle11152840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T Fahey S Griffiths TJ Peters (1995) ArticleTitleEvidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews B.M.J. 311 1056–1060

    Google Scholar 

  11. DG Altman PK Andersen (1999) ArticleTitleCalculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event B.M.J. 319 1492–1495

    Google Scholar 

  12. MR Tramèr (2001) ArticleTitleA rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 45 4–13 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x Occurrence Handle11152031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. A Moore J Edwards J Barden et al. (2003) Bandolier’s Little Book of Pain: An Evidence-based Guide to Treatments Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. B Walder D Pittet MR Tramèr (2002) ArticleTitlePrevention of bloodstream infections with central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents depends on catheter type and insertion time: evidence from a meta-analysis Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 23 748–756 Occurrence Handle12517018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AM Møller N Villebro T Pedersen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEffect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial Lancet 359 114–117 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07369-5 Occurrence Handle11809253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A Molyneux R Kerr I Stratton et al. (2002) ArticleTitleInternational Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial Lancet 360 1267–1274 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 Occurrence Handle12414200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D Poldermans E Boersma JJ Bax et al. (1999) ArticleTitleThe effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery N. Engl. J. Med. 341 1789–1794 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199912093412402 Occurrence Handle10588963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. F Schortgen JC Lacherade F Bruneel et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEffects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised study Lancet 357 911–916 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04211-2 Occurrence Handle11289347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JR Rigg K Jamrozik PS Myles et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEpidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial Lancet 359 1276–1282 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08266-1 Occurrence Handle11965272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. PC Hébert G Wells MA Blajchman et al. (1999) ArticleTitleA multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care: transfusion .requirements in critical care investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group N. Engl. J. Med. 340 409–417 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199902113400601 Occurrence Handle9971864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JD Sandham RD Hull RF Brant et al. (2003) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients N. Engl. J. Med. 348 5–14 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa021108 Occurrence Handle12510037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. RD Stevens H Burri MR Tramèr (2003) ArticleTitlePharmacologic myocardial protection in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a quantitative systematic review Anesth. Analg. 97 623–633 Occurrence Handle10.1213/01.ANE.0000074795.68061.16 Occurrence Handle12933373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. X Culebras JB Corpataux G Gaggero et al. (2003) ArticleTitleThe antiemetic efficacy of droperidol added to morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized, controlled, multicenter dose-finding study Anesth. Analg. 97 816–821 Occurrence Handle10.1213/01.ANE.0000078806.53162.89 Occurrence Handle12933408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. G Chatellier E Zapletal D Lemaitre et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context B. M. J. 312 426–429

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, A, Gin, T (2003) “From evidence to implementation” In: Tramèr, MR (editor), Evidence-Based Resource in Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 2nd edition, BMJ Books, London,

  26. J Nuovo J Mehiikow D Chang (2002) ArticleTitleReporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials J. A. M. A. 287 2813–2814 Occurrence Handle12038920

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Anesthesiology, Department APSIC, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

    Martin R. Tramèr M.D., D.Phil. & Bernhard Walder M.D.

Authors
  1. Martin R. Tramèr M.D., D.Phil.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernhard Walder M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin R. Tramèr M.D., D.Phil..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tramèr, M.R., Walder, B. Number Needed to Treat (or Harm). World J. Surg. 29, 576–581 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7916-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7916-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation