Abstract
Clinicians frequently confront challenges when using diagnostic tests to help them decide whether the patient before them suffers from a particular target condition or diagnosis. The primary issues to consider when determining the validity of a diagnostic test study are how the authors assembled the patients and whether they used an appropriate reference standard in all patients to determine whether the patients did or did not have the target condition. Surgeons should be interested in the characteristics of the test that indicates the direction and magnitude of change in the probability of the target condition associated with a particular test result. The likelihood ratio best captures the link between the pretest probability of the target condition and the probability after the test results are obtained (also called the posttest probability). Many studies, however, present the properties of diagnostic tests in less clinically useful terms: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity denotes the proportion of people with the disorder in whom the test result is positive. Specificity denotes the proportion of people without the disorder in whom the test result is negative. Application of the guides presented in this article can allow surgeons to assess critically studies regarding a diagnostic test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R Jaeschke GH Guyatt DL. Sackett (1994) ArticleTitleUser’s guide to the medical literature: how to use an article about a diagnostic test; are the results of the study valid? J.A.M.A. 271 389–391 Occurrence Handle8283589
JG Lijmer BW Mol S Heisterkamp et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEmpirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests J.A.M.A. 282 1061–1066 Occurrence Handle10493205
R. Fletcher (1986) ArticleTitleCarcinoembryonic antigen Ann. Intern. Med. 104 66–73 Occurrence Handle3510056
DMP Thompson J Krupey SO Freedman et al. (1969) ArticleTitleThe radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen of the human digestive system Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 64 161–167 Occurrence Handle5262998
W Prickett S Teefey L Galatz et al. (2003) ArticleTitleAccuracy of ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff in shoulders that are painful post-operatively J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 85 1084–1089 Occurrence Handle10.1302/0301-620X.85B7.14758 Occurrence Handle12784007
M Kawasaki Y Hasegawa S Sakano et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePrediction of osteonecrosis by magnetic resonance imaging after femoral neck fractures Clin.Orthop. 385 157–164 Occurrence Handle11302307
CB Begg RA. Greenes (1983) ArticleTitleAssessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias Biometrics 39 207–215 Occurrence Handle6871349
R Gray CB Begg RA. Greenes (1984) ArticleTitleConstruction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias Med. Decis. Making 4 151–164 Occurrence Handle6472063
DF Ransohoff AR. Feinstein (1978) ArticleTitleProblems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests N. Engl. J. Med. 299 926–930 Occurrence Handle692598
BC. Choi (1992) ArticleTitleSensitivity and specificity of a single diagnostic test in the presence of work-up bias J. Clin. Epidemiol. 45 581–586 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(92)90129-B Occurrence Handle1607897
JF Hamming BM Goslings GJ Steenis Particlevan et al. (1990) ArticleTitleThe value of fine needle biopsy in patients with nodular thyroid disease divided into groups of suspicion of malignant neoplasms on clinical grounds Arch. Intern. Med. 150 113–116 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archinte.150.1.113 Occurrence Handle2297281
TJ. Fagan (1975) ArticleTitleNomogram for Bayes’s theorem N. Engl. J. Med. 293 257 Occurrence Handle1143310
J Parvizi J Wayman P Kelly et al. (1998) ArticleTitleCombining the clinical signs improves diagnosis of scaphoid fractures J. Hand Surg. [Br.] 23 324–327
JR Hoffman WR Mower AB Wolf son et al. (2000) ArticleTitleValidity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma: National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group N. Engl. J. Med. 343 94–99 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200007133430203 Occurrence Handle10891516
SA Teefey SA Hasan WD Middleton et al. (2000) ArticleTitleUltrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive series J. Bone Joint Surg. 82 498–504 Occurrence Handle10761940
RA Rubinstein SuffixJr KD Shelbourne JR McCarroll et al. (1994) ArticleTitleThe accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries Am. J. Sports Med. 22 550–557 Occurrence Handle7943523
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhandari, M., Guyatt, G.H. How to Appraise a Diagnostic Test. World J. Surg. 29, 561–566 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7913-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7913-y