Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A New Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to develop a simple scoring system incorporating ultrasound (US) examination and clinical or laboratory predictors for increasing diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis (AA), and (2) to evaluate the performance of the scoring system as compared to that of previous models. Fifteen variables including US assessment for patients admitted with suspected AA were considered in multivariate analysis using the finding of AA at operation as the end point (internal study). The new score, together with 11 previous ones, was applied to a prospective independent population of subjects with suspected AA, and the respective performances were compared (external validation study). Among 303 patients (170 males, mean age 28.3 ± 13.3 years) of the internal study, 161 went on to surgery, and 130 had AA at operation. Four independent correlates of AA were identified and used for the derivation of the following integer-based scoring system: number of points = 6 for US demonstrating AA + 4 for tenderness in the right lower quadrant + 3 for rebound tenderness + 2 for leukocyte count >12,000/μl. In the external study (201 subjects, 105 males, mean age 28.7 ± 11.9 years, 109 operated, 87 with AA), when the cut-off of ≥ 8 points for AA was used, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of the proposed score were 95.4%, 97.4%, 96.5%, and 93%, respectively, exceeding noticeably the previous models. The proposed scoring system introduces a quantitative combination of the clinical evaluation with US imaging and a marker of inflammatory response, which may enhance the diagnostic accuracy for subjects with suspected AA especially in geographical areas where CT scanning is not readily available on a 24-hour basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 2004;91:28–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Way CW 3rd, Murphy JR, Dunn EL, et al. A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1982;155:685–688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, et al. Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis. Ann. Surg. 1983;198:753–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnbjörnsson E. Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. 1985;74:159–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986;15:557–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir. Scand. 1987;153:545–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindberg G, Feny G. Algorithmic diagnosis of appendicitis using Bayes’ theorem and logistic regression. In Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AF, editors. Bayesian Statistics 3, Oxford University Press, 1988, pp 665–668

  8. Izbicki JR, Wilker DK, Mandelkow HK, et al. Retro- and prospective studies on the value of clinical and laboratory chemical data in acute appendicitis. Chirurg 1990;61:887–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Dombal FT. Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, l991;105–106

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christian F, Christian GP. A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendectomy rate. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1992;74:281–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. A computer-based diagnostic score to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor. Surg. 1992;7:86–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q, et al. Diagnostic score for acute appendicitis. Chirurg 1995;66:135–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 1989;76:774–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, et al. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1994;76:418–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. Eur. J. Surg. 1995;161:273–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q. Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis: results of a prospective interventional study. German Study Group of Acute Abdominal Pain. Arch. Surg. 1999;134:993–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sitter H, Hoffmann S, Hassan I, et al. Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2004;389:213–218

    Google Scholar 

  18. Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D. Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1995;2:644–650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Franke C, Bohner H, Yang Q, et al. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group. World J. Surg. 1999;23:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Gritzmann N, et al. Appendicitis: should diagnostic imaging be performed if the clinical presentation is highly suggestive of the disease? Gastroenterology 2002;123:992–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch. Surg. 1993;128:1039–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H, et al. Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur. J. Surg. 1998;164:201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch. Surg. 2001;136:556–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn. Med. 1999;63:137–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Obermaier R, Benz S, Asgharnia M, et al. Value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interesting aspects. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2003;8:451–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Puig S, Hormann M, Rebhandl W, et al. US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 2003;226:101–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, et al. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 2002;225:131–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992;159:539–542

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chesbrough RM, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, et al. Self-localization in US of appendicitis: an addition to graded compression. Radiology 1993;187:349–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Amgwerd M, Rothlin M, Candinas D, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis by surgeons: a matter of experience? A prospective study. Langenbecks Arch. Chir. 1994;379:335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338:141–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pickuth D, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Spielmann RP. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique? Eur. J. Surg. 2000;166:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:933–941

    Google Scholar 

  35. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, et al. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;141:537–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, et al. Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? Arch. Surg. 1998;133:373–376

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann. Surg. 1999;229:344–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jones K, Pena AA, Dunn EL, et al. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am. J. Surg. 2004;188:748–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fourth Surgical Clinic, Athens University, Medical School, General State Hospital of Nikea, 3 D.Mantouvalou Str., Piraeus 18454, Greece

    Nikolaos E. Tzanakis M.D., Kecaris Danulidis M.D., Georgios E. Rallis M.D. & Georgios Peros M.D.

  2. Third Department of Medicine, Athens University, Medical School, Sotiria General Hospital, 152 Mesogion Ave., Athens 11527, Greece

    Stamatis P. Efstathiou M.D. & Dimitrios I. Tsioulos M.D.

  3. Department of Radiology, General State Hospital of Nikea, 3 D.Mantouvalou Str., Piraeus 18454, Greece

    Anthimos Chatzivasiliou M.D.

  4. Second Propeadeutic Department of Surgery, Athens University, Medical School, Laikon Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str, Athens 11364, Greece

    Nikolaos I. Nikiteas M.D.

Authors
  1. Nikolaos E. Tzanakis M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stamatis P. Efstathiou M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kecaris Danulidis M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Georgios E. Rallis M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dimitrios I. Tsioulos M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anthimos Chatzivasiliou M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Georgios Peros M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nikolaos I. Nikiteas M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stamatis P. Efstathiou M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzanakis, N.E., Efstathiou, S.P., Danulidis, K. et al. A New Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. World J. Surg. 29, 1151–1156 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation