Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early Enteral Feeding by Nasoenteric Tubes in Patients with Perforation Peritonitis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Malnutrition is well recognized as a potential cause of increased morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Early postoperative enteral nutrition through a feeding jejunostomy has been shown to improve results in patients undergoing major resections for gastrointestinal malignancies, trauma, and perforation peritonitis. We conducted a prospective study to assess the feasibility and short-term efficacy of early enteral feeding through a nasoenteric tube placed intraoperatively in patients with nontraumatic perforation peritonitis with malnutrition. One hundred patients with nontraumatic perforation peritonitis with malnutrition undergoing exploratory laparotomy were randomly divided into a test group (TG) and a control group (CG) of 50 patients each. TG patients had a nasoenteric tube placed at the time of surgery and were started on an enteral feeding regime 24 hours postoperatively. Patients in CG were allowed to eat orally once they passed flatus. The differences between the two groups with respect to nutritional intake in terms of energy and protein, changes in nutritional status as assessed by anthropometric, biochemical, and hematological values, amount of nasogastric aspirate, return of bowel motility, and complication rates were analyzed. The nasoenteric feeding was well tolerated. Total calorie and protein intake in TG was significantly higher than in CG: 981 vs. 505 kcal (p < 0.01), protein 24 vs. 0 g on day 3 and 1498 vs. 846 kcal (p < 0.01), protein 44 vs. 23 g (p < 0.01) on day 7, respectively. There was reduction in the amount of nasogastric aspirate in TG compared with that in CG: 431 vs. 545 ml/24 h on day 2 and 301 vs. 440 ml/24 h on day 3, respectively. There was much faster recovery of bowel motility in TG than in CG at 3.34 vs. 4.4 days (p < 0.01). Complications developed in 39 of 50 patients in TG and in 47 of 50 in CG. The major complications occurred in 6 patients in TG and 12 patients in CG (p < 0.05). Patients with perforation peritonitis with malnutrition are likely to develop large energy deficits postoperatively, resulting in higher incidence of infective complications. Early enteral feeding through a nasoenteric tube is well tolerated by these patients and helps to improve energy and protein intake, reduces the amount of nasogastric aspirate, reduces the duration of postoperative ileus, and reduces the risk of serious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Bistsrian BR, Blackburn GL, Vitale J, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in general medical patients. JAMA 1976;235:1567–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill GL, Pickford I, Young GA, et al. Malnutrition in surgical patients: an unrecognized problem. Lancet 1977;I:689–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. BM J 1994;308:945–948

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giner M. In 1995 a correlation still exists between malnutrition and poor outcome in critically ill patients. Nutrition 1996;12:23–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pennington C, Powell–Tuck J, Shaffer J. Review article: artificial nutritional support for improved patient care. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 1995;9:471–481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Winsdor JA, Hill GL. Risk factors for post operative pneumonia: the importance of protein depletion. Ann. Surg. 1988;17:181–185

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jeejeebhoy KN. Muscle function and nutrition. Gut 1986;27:25–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bower RH, Talamini MA, Sax HC, et al. Post-operative enteral vs parenteral nutrition. Arch. Surg. 1986;121:1040–1045

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander JW, Macmillan BG, Stinnett JD. Beneficial effect of aggressive protein feeding in severely burned children. Ann Surg 1980;182(4):505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore EE, Moore FA. Immediate enteral nutrition following multi-system trauma: a decade perspective. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1991;10:633–648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effect on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann. Surg. 1992;215(5):503–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Immune and nutritional effects of early enteral nutrition after major abdominal operations. Eur. J. Surg. 1996;162:105–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pupelis G, Selga G, Edmunds A, et al. Jejunal feeding, even when instituted late, improves outcomes in patients with severe pancreatitis and peritonitis. Nutrition 2001;17(2):91–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Furukawa S, Hideaki S, Ming-tsan L, et al. Enteral administration of glutamine in purulent peritonitis. Nutrition 1999;15(1):29–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh G, Ram RP, Khanna SK. Early postoperative enteral feeding in patients with nontraumatic intestinal perforation and peritonitis. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1998;134:142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Study Group. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325:535–545

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elebute EA, Stoner HB. The grading of sepsis. Br. J. Surg. 1983;70:29–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN, Upadhay SK. Physical and sexual growth of affluent Indian children from 5 to 18 years of age. Indian Paediatr. 1992;29:1203–1282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mullen JJ, Gertner MH, Buzby GP, et al. Implications of malnutrition in the surgical patient. Arch. Surg. 1979;114:121–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma LK, Gupta S, Soin AS, et al. Generalized peritonitis in India–The tropical spectrum. Jpn. J. of Surg. 1991;21:272–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta V, Gupta SK, Shukla VK, et al. Perforated typhoid enteritis in children. Postgrad. Med. J. 1994;70:19–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nyguyen VS. Typhoid perforation in tropics. J. Chir. (Paris) 1994;131:90–95

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dhar A, Bagga D, Taneja SB. Perforated tubercular enteritis of childhood: a ten year study. Indian J Pediatr 1990;57:713–716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chazecet C, Deixonne B, Eldejam JJ, et al. A case of peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestines of tubercular etiology: review of literature. Ann. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (Paris) 1988;24:243–247

    Google Scholar 

  25. Monteferrante E, Mancini G, Pedrazzoli C, et al. The nasojejunal tube in early postoperative nutrition. Minerva Chir. 1999;54(7–8):551–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Braga M, Gianotti L, Gentilini O, et al. Feeding the gut early after digestive surgery: results of a nine year experience. Clin. Nutr. 2002;21(1):59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayashi JT, Wolfe BM, Calvert CC. Limited efficacy of early postoperative jejunal feeding. Am. J. Surg. 1985;150:52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein MD, Dyne PL, Duerbeck NB. The Proef diet—A new postoperative regimen for early oral feeding. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;168:128–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Basse L, Hjort JD, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resections. Ann. Surg. 2000;232(1):15–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Adam S, Batson S. A study of problems associated with the delivery of enteral feed in critically ill patients in five ICUs in the UK. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Herbert HC, Ryan JA, Anderson AJ, et al. Nutritional benefits of immediate postoperative jejunal feeding of an elemental diet. Am. J. Surg. 1980;139:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seltzer MH, Slocum BA, Cataldi–Belcher EL. Instant nutritional assessment. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1979;3:157–159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Haydock DA, Hill GL. Impaired wound healing in surgical patients with varying degrees of malnutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 1986;10:550–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Klidjian AM, Foster KJ, Kammerling RM, et al. Relation of anthropometeric and dynamometeric variables to serious postoperative complications. BMJ 1980;281:899–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salsi P, Cortellini P, Simonazzi M, et al. The use of early enteral nutrition (EEN) after major urologic surgery. Acta Biomed. Ateneo Parmense 1998;69(1–2):61–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tucker HN, Miguel SG. Cost containment through nutrition intervention. Nutr. Rev. 1996;54:111–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Neumayer LA, Smout RJ, Horn HG, et al. Early and sufficient feeding reduces length of stay and charges in surgical patients. J. Surg. Res. 2001;95:73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navneet Kaur M.S..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaur, N., Gupta, M.K. & Minocha, V.R. Early Enteral Feeding by Nasoenteric Tubes in Patients with Perforation Peritonitis. World J. Surg. 29, 1023–1027 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7491-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7491-z

Keywords

Navigation