Skip to main content
Log in

Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: 7-year Intention-to-treat Results

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this single-institution study was to describe our 7-year intention-to-treat results, obtained with the use of endovascular techniques for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA).

Patients and Methods

From October 1998 until March 2005, a total of 28 patients were admitted or transferred to our department with an rAAA. They were all treated according to a management protocol of intention-to-treat with endovascular techniques. Twenty of the patients received endovascular treatment and the remaining 8 underwent an open surgery procedure.

Results

The mortality rate of the endovascularly treated patients was 40% (8 in 20), whereas of the 8 surgical patients 3 survived (mortality = 62.5%). The overall mortality rate of the 28 patients admitted with an rAAA was 46.4% (13 of 28 patients).

Conclusions

In our experience the intension-to-treat protocol for rAAA offered acceptable results in terms of mortality rates. Multi-center studies are necessary to establish the role of endovascular treatment in patients with rAAA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calderwood R, Halka T, Haji-Michael P, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Is it possible to predict outcome? Int Angiol 2004;23:47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heller JA, Weinberg A, Arons A, et al. Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: have we made any progress? J Vasc Surg 2000;32:1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heikkinen M, Selenius JP, Auvinen O. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a well-defined geographic area. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassar K, Godden DJ, Duncan JL. Community mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is unrelated to the distance to the surgical center. Br J Surg 2001;88:1341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Semmens JB, Norman PE, Lawrence-Brown MM, et al. Influence of gender on outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2000;87:191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choksy SA, Wilmink AB, Quick CR. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Huntingdon district: a 10-year experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;81:27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D. Rupture abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based study. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Previti FW, Onopchenko A, Glick B. The ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a community hospital. A 5-year study. Am Surg 1992;58:499

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. AbuRahma AF, Woodruff BA, Lucente FC, et al. Factors affecting survival of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a West Virginia community. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peppelenbosch N, Yilmaz N, van Marrewijk C, et al. Emergency treatment of acute symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Outcome of a prospective intent-to-treat by EVAR protocol. Eur J Vasc Endovas Surg 2003;26:303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gloviczki P, Pairolero PC, Mucha P Jr, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: repair should not be denied. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:851–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cronenwett JL, Rutherford RB. Decision Making in Vascular Surgery, Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, et al. Ruptured aortic aneurysm: endovascular treatment. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dalainas I, Nano G, Casana R, et al. Mid-term results after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a four-year experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;27:319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerassimidis TS, Papazoglou KO, Kamparoudis AG, et al. Endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: 6-year experience from a Greek center. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yilmaz N, Peppelenbosch N, Cuypers PW, et al. Emergency treatment of symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther 2002;24:449–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Sambeek MRHM, van Dijk LC, Hendriks JM, et al. Endovascular versus conventional open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm: feasibility and preliminary results. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:443–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapma MR, Verhoeven EL, Tielliu IF, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm with a bifurcated stent graft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29:510–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilias Dalainas MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalainas, I., Nano, G., Bianchi, P. et al. Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: 7-year Intention-to-treat Results. World J. Surg. 30, 1809–1814 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0667-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0667-8

Keywords

Navigation