Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of Extrathyroid Extension of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Massive but Not Minimal Extension Affects the Relapse-free Survival

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Extrathyroid extension has been recognized as a prognostic factor in papillary thyroid carcinoma. In the most recent version of the UICC TNM classification system, extrathyroid extension has been classified into two grades, minimal extension (extension to sternothyroid muscle or perithyroid soft tissues) and massive extension (extension to subcutaneous soft tissue, larynx, trachea, esophagus, or recurrent laryngeal nerve). In this study, we investigated the prognostic significance of each of the two types of extension.

Patients and Methods

One thousand and sixty-seven patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma without distant metastasis at surgery, who underwent surgical treatment in Kuma hospital between 1990 and 1995 and had been followed postoperatively for 60 months or more, were enrolled in this study. The grading of extrathyroid extension was based on both pathological findings and intraoperative surgical findings.

Results

In univariate analysis, although patients with massive extension showed a significantly worse relapse-free survival (RFS) rate than those with no or minimal extension (P < 0.0001), there was no difference in the RFS rate between patients with no extension and those with minimal extension. Among patients with massive extension, the RFS rate tended to be worse in those with posterior extension than in those with anterior extension (P = 0.0562). Furthermore, the RFS rate of patients with massive posterior extension only to the recurrent nerve demonstrated a better RFS rate than those with extension to other posterior organs (P = 0.0052). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that massive extrathyroid extension is recognized as an independent prognostic factor for RFS (P = 0.0003).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that (1) upgrading of T category for tumors with massive extension is appropriate, whereas that for tumors with only minimal extension is not, and (2) careful surgical treatment and postoperative follow-up are required for tumors with massive extension to posterior organs other than the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch., eds. UICC: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 5th edition, New York, Wiley, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch., eds. UICC: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th edition, New York, Wiley-Liss, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, et al. Minimal extrathyroid extension does not affect relapse-free survival of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma measuring 4 cm or less over the age of 45. Surg Today in press

  4. Russell MA, Gilbert EF, Jaeschke WF. Prognostic features of thyroid cancer. A long-term follow-up of 68 cases. Cancer 1975;36:553–559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tscholl-Ducommun J, Hedinger CE. Papillary thyroid carcinoimas. Morphology and prognosis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1982;396:19–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carcangiu ML, Zampi G, Pupi A, et al. Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A clinicopathologic study of 241 cases treated at the University of Florence, Italy. Cancer 1985;55:805–828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schindler AM, van Melle G, Evequoz B, et al. Prognostic factors in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Cancer 1991;68:324–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moreno-Egea A, Rodriguez-Gonzalez JM, Sola-Perez J, et al. Multivariate analysis of histopathological features as prognostic factors in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Br J Surg 1995;82:1092–1094

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Boscherini M, et al. Prognositc factors in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 234 consecutive patients. J Surg Oncol 1998;68:237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li JD, Chao TC, Weng HF, et al. Prognostic variables of papillary thyroid carcinomas with local invasion. Endocrinol J 1999;46:91–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, et al. Ultrasound-detectable and anatomopathologically-detectable node metastasis in the lateral compartment as indicators of worse relapse-free survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg 2005;29:917–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiro Ito MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, Y., Tomoda, C., Uruno, T. et al. Prognostic Significance of Extrathyroid Extension of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Massive but Not Minimal Extension Affects the Relapse-free Survival. World J. Surg. 30, 780–786 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0270-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0270-z

Keywords

Navigation