Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting Postoperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Well-known and suitable instruments for surgical audit are the POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems. But these scores have not been well validated across the countries. The objective of the present study was to assess the predictive value of scores for colorectal surgery in France. Patients operated on for colorectal malignant or diverticular diseases, whether electively or on emergency basis, within a 4-month period were included in a prospective multicenter study conducted by the French Association for Surgery (Association Française de Chirurgie, AFC). The main outcome measure was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Independent factors leading to death were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis (AFC-index). The ratio of expected versus observed deaths was calculated, and the predictive value of the POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A total of 1426 patients were included. The in-hospital death rate was 3.4%. Four independent preoperative factors (AFC-index) have been found: emergency surgery, loss of more than 10% of weight, neurological disease history, and age > 70 years. POSSUM had a poor predictive value; it overestimated postoperative death in all cases. P-POSSUM had a good predictive value, except for elective surgery, where it overestimated postoperative death twofold. The predictive value of the AFC-index was also good. It had the same sensitivity and specificity as the P-POSSUM. POSSUM has not been validated in France in the field of colorectal surgery. P-POSSUM was as predictive as the AFC-index which is a simpler instrument based on four clinical parameters (without any mathematical formulas).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones HJS, de Cossart L. Risk scoring in surgical patients. Br J Surg 1999;86:149–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:356–360

    Google Scholar 

  3. Copeland GP. The POSSUM system of surgical audit. Arch Surg 2002;137:15–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whiteley MS, Prythech DR, Higgins B, et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 1996;83:812–815

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prytherch D, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, et al. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 1998;85:1217–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Isbister WH, Al Sanea N. POSSUM: are-evaluation in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Aust NZ J Surg 2002;72:421–425

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yii MK, Ng KJ. Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Br J Surg 2002;89:110–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, et al. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests or logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997;16:965–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwiatkowski F, Girard M, Hacene K, et al. SEM: a suitable statistical software adaptated for research in oncology. Bull. Cancer 2000;87:715–721 (in French)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Mancey-Jones B, et al. Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 1994;81:1492–1494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Bentley AJE, et al. Operative mortality rates among surgeons. Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1528–1534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tekkis PP, Kessaris N, Kocher HM, et al. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2003;90:340–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, et al. Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 2004;91:1174–1182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Duepree HJ, et al. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy. Br J Surg 2003;90:1280–1284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Slim K, Panis Y, Mantion G, et al. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy. Br J Surg 2003;90:1611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Neary WD, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM). Br J Surg 2003;90:157–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, et al. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:83–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bozzetti F, Gavazzi C, Miceli R, et al. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in malnourished, gastrointestinal cancer patients: a randomized, clinical trial. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2000;24:7–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I, et al. Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 2005;92:101–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all surgeon members of the Association Française de Chirurgie from the 81 centers who included patients in the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karem Slim MD.

Additional information

K.S. designed the study, collected the data, and wrote the manuscript, Y.P. and G.M. designed the study and discussed the results and interpreted the data, A.A. and P.M. collected the data and participated in the discussion about the results, and F.K. performed the statistical analyses. All authors reviewed the manuscript

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slim, K., Panis, Y., Alves, A. et al. Predicting Postoperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. World J. Surg. 30, 100–106 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0081-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0081-2

Keywords

Navigation