Skip to main content
Log in

Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Intraoperative Rapid Pathological Assessment of the Gastric Margin

  • Original Scientific Reports
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer, as the resection area is difficult to define preoperatively, we define the resection area by intraoperative rapid pathological assessment of the resected margin. In some patients, however, the result of postoperative assessment of a permanent section differs from the result obtained intraoperatively. In this study we explored methods of improving the accuracy of intraoperative pathological assessment. Of the patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at Takarazuka Municipal Hospital, between April 2000 and July 2001, intraoperative pathological assessment of the resection margin was performed in 34 because it could not be accurately defined preoperatively. The intraoperative assessment consisted of touch smear cytological examination and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and cytokeratin (CK) histological examination. The time required to perform cytological examination and HE and CK immunohistochemistry by this modified method, which uses an ENVISION Kit/HRP, was approximately 20 minutes for each procedure. Touch smear cytological examination gave false positive results in 3 of 34 patients (8.8%). Of the 14 patients preoperatively diagnosed with signet-ring cell carcinoma, intraoperative HE histological analysis yielded a false negative result in one (7.1%). The results of CK histological assessment of these patients were all consistent with those of postoperative examination of permanent sections. Of the 20 patients preoperatively diagnosed with non-signet-ring cell carcinoma, HE analysis yielded a false negative result in one (5%). The results of CK histological assessment of these patients were all consistent with those of postoperative examination of permanent sections. Our modified CK staining method with the ENVISION Kit/HRP allows intraoperative pathological assessment to be performed accurately and rapidly. This method is more useful than HE immunohistochemistry for the assessment of resected gastric margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JL Cordell B Falini WN Erber et al. (1984) ArticleTitleImmunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 32 219–229 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXotlyiuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6198355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. IA Nasser AK Lee S Bosari et al. (1993) ArticleTitleOccult axillary lymph node metastases in “node-negative” breast carcinoma Hum. Pathol. 24 950–957 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD2svpvVc%3D Occurrence Handle7504652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MA McGuckin MC Cummings MD Walsh et al. (1996) ArticleTitleOccult axillary node metastases in breast cancer: their detection and prognostic significance Br. J. Cancer 73 88–95 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2cnmtVM%3D Occurrence Handle8554990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K Ishida T Katsuyama A Sugiyama et al. (1997) ArticleTitleImmunohistochemical evaluation of lymph node micrometastases from gastric carcinoma Cancer 79 1069–1076 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970315)79:6<1069::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-B Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB38zptVU%3D Occurrence Handle9070482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JR Sievert R Kestlmeier R Busch et al. (1996) ArticleTitleBenefits of D2 lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer and pN0 and pN1 lymph node metastases Br. J. Surg. 83 1144–1147 Occurrence Handle8869330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. F Kijima S Natsugoe S Takao et al. (2000) ArticleTitleDetection and clinical significance of lymph node micrometastasis determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in patients with esophageal carcinoma Oncology 58 38–44 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000012077 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7htlSnsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10644939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M Futamura Y Takagi H Koumura et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSpread of colorectal cancer micrometastases in regional lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions for carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 20 J. Surg. Oncol. 68 34–40 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199805)68:1<34::AID-JSO8>3.0.CO;2-M Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3nt1WqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9610661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RR Turner DW Ollila DL Krasne et al. (1997) ArticleTitleHistopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma Ann. Surg. 226 271–278 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199709000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2sbosFY%3D Occurrence Handle9339933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. S Natsugoe S Nakashima M Matsumoto et al. (1999) ArticleTitleParaaortic lymph node micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement in advanced gastric carcinoma Gastric Cancer 2 179–185 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101200050043 Occurrence Handle11957093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M Mori K Mimori H Ueo et al. (1998) ArticleTitleClinical significance of molecular detection of carcinoma cells in lymph nodes and peripheral blood by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in patients with gastrointestinal or breast carcinomas J. Clin. Oncol. 16 128–132 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gtFKrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9440733

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RW Cartun (1995) ArticleTitleImmunohistochemistry of infectious disease J Histotechnol. 18 195–202

    Google Scholar 

  12. M Vyberg S Nielsen (1998) ArticleTitleDextran polymer conjugate two-step visualization system for immunohistochemistry Immunohistochemistry 6 3–10 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXitlChtbk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J Woodcock-Mitchell R Eichner WG Nelson et al. (1982) ArticleTitleImmunolocalization of keratin polypeptides in human epidermis using monoclonal antibodies J. Cell Biol. 95 580–587 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL38XmtFWku7o%3D Occurrence Handle6183275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. R Moll WW Franke DL Schiller (1982) ArticleTitleThe catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells Cell 31 11–24 Occurrence Handle6186379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. IT Rubin S Korourian C Cowan et al. (1998) ArticleTitleUse of touch preps for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol. 5 689–694 Occurrence Handle9869514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Matsusaka M.D., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsusaka, S., Nagareda, T., Yamasaki, H. et al. Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Intraoperative Rapid Pathological Assessment of the Gastric Margin. World J. Surg. 27, 715–718 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-6792-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-6792-3

Keywords

Navigation