Abstract
The need for cross-disciplinary scientific inquiries that facilitate improved natural resource management outcomes through increased understanding of both the biophysical and human dimensions of management issues has been widely recognized. Despite this broad recognition, a number of obstacles and barriers still sometimes challenge the successful implementation of cross-disciplinary approaches. Improving understanding of these challenges and barriers will help address them and thereby foster appropriate and effective utilization of cross-disciplinary approaches to solve natural resource management challenges. This research uses a case study analysis of the United States National Estuarine Research Reserve System to improve understanding of the critical factors that influence practitioners’ decisions related to incorporating social science into their natural resource management work. The case study research is analyzed and evaluated within a Theory of Planned Behavior framework to (1) determine and describe the factors that predict practitioners’ intent to incorporate social science into their natural resource related activities and (2) recommend potential strategies for encouraging and enabling cross-disciplinary approaches to natural resource management. The results indicate that National Estuarine Research Reserve practitioners’ decisions related to incorporating social science are primarily influenced by (1) confidence in their own capability to incorporate social science into their work and (2) beliefs about whether the outcomes of incorporating social science into their work would be valuable or beneficial.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179–211
Ajzen I (2002) Residual effects of past on later behavior: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6:107–122
Ajzen I (2006) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2009
Anderson LG, Bishop R, Davidson M, Hanna S, Holliday M, Kildow J, and others (2003) Social science research within NOAA: review and recommendations. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring
Boldero J (1995) The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: the role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25:440–462
Cheung SF, Chan DK-S, Wong ZS-Y (1999) Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and Behavior 31:587–612
Conner M, Armitage CJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28:1429–1464
Corbert JB (2002) Motivations to participate in riparian improvement programs: applying the theory of planned behavior. Science Communication 23:243–263
Decker DJ, Brown TL, Connelly NA, Enck JW, Pomerantz GA, Purdy KG, Siemer WF (1992) Toward a comprehensive paradigm of wildlife management: Integrating the human and biological dimensions. In: Mangun WR (ed) American fish and wildlife policy: the human dimension. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp 33–54
DeMaio TJ, Rothgeb J, Hess J (1998) Improving survey quality through pretesting. Proceedings of the survey research methods section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M (1998) A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 8:891–904
Ewel KC (2001) Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 4:716–722
Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, and others (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behavior: a manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, Newcastle upon Tyne
Fulton DC, Nelson KC, Anderson DH, Lime DW (eds) (2000) Priority issues and future directions in human dimensions research. In: Human dimensions of natural resource management: emerging issues and practical applications. Cooperative Park Studies Program, University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources, pp 1–8
Gardner GT, Stern PC (2002) Environmental problems and human behavior, 2nd edn. Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston
Global Evaluation and Applied Research Solutions Inc (2009) NOAA Coastal Services Center and NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System Coastal Training Program joint external review of training activities: findings and improvement options. Author, Decatur
Hiwasaki L, Arico S (2007) Integrating the social sciences into ecohydrology: facilitating an interdisciplinary approach to solve issues surrounding water, environment, and people. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 17:3–9
Hsiu-Fang H, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15:1277–1288
Janesick VJ (1998) The dance of qualitative research design: metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 35–55
Mangel M, Talbot LM, Meffe GK, Tundi Agardy M, Averson DL, Barlow J, and others (1996) Principles for the conservation of wild living resources. Ecological Applications 6:338–362
McDermaid KK, Barnstable DC (2001) Step-by-step guide to conducting a social profile for watershed planning. University of Illinois, Urbana
Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1992) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2005) Social science plan, vol 1. National Ocean Service. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
Nowak P, Cabot P (2004) The human dimension of resource management programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59:128A–135A
Nowak P, Korsching P (1998) The human dimension of soil and water conservation: a historical and methodological perspective. In: Pierce FJ, Frye WW (eds) Advances in soil and water conservation. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, pp 159–184
Nowak P, Bowen S, Cabot P (2006) Disproportionality as a framework for linking social and biophysical systems. Society and Natural Resources 19:153–173
Ocean Studies Board and National Research Council (1995) Science, policy, and the coast: improving decision making. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Ouellette JA, Wood W (1998) Habitat and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin 124:54–74
Pasquini L, Twyman C, Wainwright J (2010) Toward a conceptual framework for blending social and biophysical attributes in conservation planning: a case-study of privately-conserved lands. Environmental Management 46:659–670
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
Perry JA, Perry EK (1988) Contemporary society: an introduction to social science, 5th edn. Harper & Row Publishers, New York
Poliakoff E, Webb TL (2007) What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication 29:242–263
Richmond RH, Rongo T, Golbuu Y, Victor S, Idechong N, Davis G, Kostka W, Neth L, Hamnett M, Wolanski E (2007) Watersheds and coral reefs: conservation science, policy, and implementation. BioScience 57:598–607
Riley C (2005) National estuarine research reserve system strategic plan, 2005–2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Estuarine Reserves Division, Silver Spring
Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn. The Free Press, New York
Scheffer M, Westley F, Brock WA, Holmgren M (2002) Dynamic interaction of societies and ecosystems-linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 195–239
Seidman IE (1991) Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press, New York
Sinclair J, Mazzotti F, Graham J (2003) Motives to seek threatened and endangered species information for land-use decisions. Science Communication 25:39–55
Singleton RA, Straits BC (2001) Survey interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA (eds) Handbook of interview research. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 59–82
Snow DA, Anderson L (1991) Researching the homeless: the characteristic features and virtues of the case study. In: Feagan JR, Orum AM, Sjoberg G (eds) A case for the case study. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, pp 148–173
Society for Conservation Biology (2009) Catalog of conservation social science tools. http://www.conbio.org/workinggroups/sswg/catalog/. Accessed 11 Jan 2011
Tellis W (1997) Application of a case study methodology. The qualitative report 3. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-3/tellis2.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2008
United States Department of Agriculture (2010) People and their environments. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/units/socialscience/. Accessed 11 Jan 2011
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2008) Social science research. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/es/science/social/. Accessed 11 Jan 2011
Yin R (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oak
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff of the NOAA Estuarine Reserves Division and the staff at each of the National Estuarine Research Reserves for so graciously assisting with, and participating in, this research.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, P., Genskow, K., Shaw, B. et al. Barriers and Opportunities for Integrating Social Science into Natural Resource Management: Lessons from National Estuarine Research Reserves. Environmental Management 50, 998–1011 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9930-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9930-6