Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Burned and Mowed Treatments in Mountain Big Sagebrush Steppe

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fires in mountain big sagebrush [Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana (Rydb.) Beetle] plant communities historically shifted dominance from woody to herbaceous vegetation. However, fire return intervals have lengthened with European settlement, and sagebrush dominance has increased at the expense of herbaceous vegetation in some plant communities. Management actions may be needed to decrease sagebrush in dense sagebrush stands to increase herbaceous vegetation. Prescribed fire is often used to remove sagebrush; however, mechanical treatments, such as mowing, are increasingly used because they are more controllable and do not pose an inherent risk of escape compared with fire. However, information on the effects of burned and mowed treatments on herbaceous vegetation and whether fire and mowed applications elicit similar vegetation responses are limited. We evaluated the effects of prescribed burning and mowing for 3 years after treatment in mountain big sagebrush plant communities. The burned and mowed treatments generally increased herbaceous cover, density, and production compared with untreated controls (P < 0.05). However, neither treatment induced a response in native perennial forb cover, density, or biomass (P > 0.05). In contrast, annual forb (predominately natives) cover, density, and biomass increased with mowing and burning (P < 0.05). Vegetation generally responded similarly in burned and mowed treatments; however, the burned treatment had less sagebrush, greater herbaceous vegetation production, and more bare ground than the mowed treatment (P < 0.05). These differences should be considered when selecting treatments to decrease sagebrush.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman TL (1979) Germination and survival of perennial plant species in the Mojave Desert. Southwest Nat 24:399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JD, Svejcar TJ (2009) Herbaceous succession after burning cut western juniper trees. West North American Nat 69:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JD, Miller RF, Svejcar T (2005) Long-term successional trends following western juniper control. Rangel Ecol Manag 58:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JD, Davies KW, Sharp RN (2011) Shrub-steppe early succession following juniper cutting and prescribed fire. Environ Manag 47:468–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck JL, Mitchell DL (2000) Influence of livestock grazing on sage grouse habitat. Wildl Soc Bull 28:993–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck JL, Connelly JW, Reese KP (2009) Recovery of greater sage-grouse habitat features in Wyoming big sagebrush following prescribed fire. Restor Ecol 17:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisdell JP (1953) Ecological effects of planned burning of sagebrush-grass range on the upper Snake River Plains. USDA Technical Bulletin No. 1075, Washington, DC

  • Boyd CS, Davies KW (2010) Shrub microsite influences post-fire perennial grass establishment. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CS, Svejcar TJ (2011) The influence of plant removal on succession in Wyoming big sagebrush. J Arid Environ 75:734–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield RH (1941) Application of the line interception methods in sampling range vegetation. J For 39:388–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, Roundy BA, Blank RR, Meyer SE, Whittaker A (2007) What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecol Monogr 77:117–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BM, Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Battles J (2010) Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. J For 108:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly JW, Schroeder MA, Sands AR, Braun CE (2000) Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats. Wildl Soc Bull 28:967–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad EC, Poulton CE (1966) Effect of wildfire on Idaho fescue and Bluebunch wheatgrass. J Range Manag 19:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JA, Olson RA, West NE, Mosley JC, Schroeder MA, Whitson TD et al (2004) Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat. J Range Manag 57:2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren DK, Chi R, Messmer TA (2006) Greater sage-grouse response to sagebrush management in Utah. Wildl Soc Bull 34:975–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW (2008) Medusahead dispersal and establishment in sagebrush steppe plant communities. Rangel Ecol Manag 61:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD (2010a) Vegetation characteristics of mountain and Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities in the northern Great Basin. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD (2010b) Native perennial forb variation between mountain big sagebrush and Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities. Environ Manage 46:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Miller RF (2007) Short-term effects of burning Wyoming big sagebrush steppe in southeast Oregon. Rangel Ecol Manag 60:515–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, James JJ (2009a) Microsite and herbaceous vegetation heterogeneity after burning Artemisia tridentata steppe. Oecologia 159:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Svejcar TJ, Bates JD (2009b) Interaction of historical and non-historical disturbances maintains native plant communities. Ecol Appl 19:1536–1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Nafus AM (2011) Are there benefits to mowing intact Wyoming big sagebrush communities? An evaluation from southeastern Oregon. Environ Manag 48:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Nafus AM (2012) Vegetation response to mowing dense mountain big sagebrush stands. Rangel Ecol Manag 65:268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center (2010) EOARC weather data. EOARC, Burns

  • Goergen EM, Chamber JC (2009) Influence of a native legume on soil N and plant response following prescribed fire in sagebrush steppe. Int J Wildl Fire 18:665–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harniss RO, Murray RB (1973) 30 years of vegetal change following burning of sagebrush-grass range. J Rangel Manag 26:322–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick DW, Hyder DN, Sneva FA, Poulton CE (1966) Ecological response of sagebrush-grass range in central Oregon to mechanical and chemical removal of Artemisia. Ecology 47:432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess JE, Beck JL (2012) Burning and mowing Wyoming big sagebrush: do treated sites meet minimum guidelines for greater sage-grouse breeding habitats? Wildl Soc Bull 36:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes AL (2007) Short-term effects of a prescribed burn on songbirds and vegetation in mountain big sagebrush. West North American Nat 67:292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James JJ, Davies KW, Sheley RL, Aanderud ZT (2008) Linking nitrogen partitioning and species abundance to invasion resistance in the Great Basin. Oecologia 156:637–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JR, Payne GF (1968) Sagebrush re-invasion as affected by some environmental influences. J Rangel Manag 21:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CW, Schumaker GA, Smith JP (1980) Effects of grazing and sagebrush control on potential erosion. J Rangel Manag 33:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kigel J (1995) Seed germination in arid and semiarid regions. In: Kigel J, Galili G (eds) Seed development and germination. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp 654–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier AM, Perryman BL, Olson RA, Hild AL (2001) Climatic influences on recruitment of three subspecies of Artemisia tridentata. J Rangel Manag 54:699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel KC, Anderson DL, Ballientte JF (1991) Wyoming big sagebrush control with metsulfuron and 2, 4-D in northern New Mexico. J Rangel Manag 44:623–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Heyerdahl EK (2008) Fine-scale variation of historical fire regimes in sagebrush-steppe and juniper woodland: an example from California, USA. Int J Wildl Fire 17:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Rose JA (1999) Fire history and western juniper encroachment in sagebrush steppe. J Rangel Manag 52:550–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueggler WF (1956) Is sagebrush seed residual in the soil of burns or is it wind-borne? USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note, RN INT-35. Ogden, UT

  • Mueggler WF, Blaisdell JP (1958) Effects on associated species of burning, rotobeating, spraying, and railing sagebrush. J Rangel Manag 11:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelle PJ, Reese KP, Connelly JW (2000) Long-term effects of fire on sage grouse habitat. J Rangel Manag 53:586–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noson AC, Schmitz RA, Miller RF (2006) Influence of fire and juniper encroachment on birds in high-elevation sagebrush steppe. West North American Nat 66:343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resource Conservation Service (1998) Climate dataset. NRCS, Fort Worth, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson RA, Whitson TD (2002) Restoring structure in late-successional sagebrush communities by thinning with tebuthiuron. Restor Ecol 10:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek JM, Riggs RA, Lauer JL (1979) Evaluation of fall burning on bighorn sheep winter range. J Rangel Manag 32:430–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson FB, Robichaud PR, Moffet CA, Spaeth KE, Hardegree SP, Clark PE et al (2008) Fire effects on rangeland hydrology and erosion in a steep sagebrush-dominated landscape. Hydrol Process 22:2916–2929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson FB, Moffet CA, Williams CJ, Hardegree SP, Clark P (2009) Prescribed-fire effects on rill and interrill runoff and erosion in a mountainous sagebrush landscape. Earth Surf Proc Land 34:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle WH, Crawford JA (1996) Availability of foods of sage grouse chicks following prescribed fire in sagebrush–bitterbrush. J Rangel Manag 49:320–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinkensmeyer DP, Miller RF, Anthony RG, Marr VE (2007) Avian community structure along a mountain big sagebrush gradient. J Wildl Manag 71:1057–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes EC, Bates JD, Sharp RN, Davies KW (2010) Fire effects on cover and dietary resources of sage-grouse habitat. J Wildl Manag 74:755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse LR, Sneva FA (1976) Expressing the competitive relationship between Wyoming big sagebrush and crested wheatgrass. J Rangel Manag 29:326–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneva FA (1972) Grazing return following sagebrush control in eastern Oregon. J Rangel Manag 25:174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart G, Hull AC (1949) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.)—An ecologic intruder in southern Idaho. Ecology 30:58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uresk DW, Cline JF, Packard WH (1976) Impact of wildfire on three perennial grasses in south-central Washington. J Rangel Manag 29:309–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uresk DW, Packard WH, Cline JF (1980) Perennial grasses and their response to a wildfire in south-central Washington. J Rangel Manag 33:111–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urness PJ (1979) Wildlife habitat manipulation in sagebrush ecosystems. In: The sagebrush ecosystem: A symposium. April 1978. College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, pp 169–178

  • Vale TR (1974) Sagebrush conversion projects: an element of contemporary environmental change in the western United States. Biol Conserv 6:274–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wambolt CL, Payne GF (1986) An 18-year comparison of control methods for Wyoming big sagebrush in southwestern Montana. J Rangel Manag 39:314–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wambolt CL, Walhof KS, Frisina MR (2001) Recovery of big sagebrush communities after burning in south-western Montana. J Environ Manag 61:243–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West NE (1983) Great Basin-Colorado Plateau sagebrush semi-desert and western Intermountain sagebrush steppe. In: West NE (ed) Ecosystems of the world: temperate deserts and semi-deserts. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 331–374

    Google Scholar 

  • West NE, Hassan MA (1985) Recovery of sagebrush-grass vegetation following wildfire. J Rangel Manag 38:131–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth TA, Pyke DA (2003) Restoring forbs for sage grouse habitat: fire, microsites, and establishment methods. Restor Ecol 11:370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology: United States and Southern Canada. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright HA, Neuenschwander LF, Britton CM (1979) The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: a state-of-the-art review. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-58, Ogden, UT

  • Wrobleski DW, Kauffman JB (2003) Initial effects of prescribed fire on morphology, abundance, and phenology of forbs in big sagebrush communities in southeastern Oregon. Restor Ecol 11:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JA, Evans RA, Palmquist DE (1990) Soil surface characteristics and emergence of big sagebrush seedlings. J Rangel Manag 43:358–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegenhagen LL, Miller RF (2009) Postfire recovery of two shrubs in the interiors of large burns in the Intermountain West, USA. West North American Nat 69:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mike Gregg, Gail Collins, Marla Bennett, and all of the staff at the Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge for their assistance in locating the study sites and implementing the treatments. Data collection and processing by summer student technicians was greatly appreciated. The authors appreciated the thoughtful reviews of earlier versions of this manuscript by Dustin Johnson, David Ganskopp, anonymous reviewers, and the Associate Editor. This study was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service and United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Sheldon–Hart Refuge Complex.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Burns, OR, 97720, USA

    K. W. Davies, J. D. Bates & A. M. Nafus

Authors
  1. K. W. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. D. Bates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. M. Nafus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Davies.

Additional information

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, K.W., Bates, J.D. & Nafus, A.M. Comparing Burned and Mowed Treatments in Mountain Big Sagebrush Steppe. Environmental Management 50, 451–461 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9898-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9898-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation