Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Satisfaction and Emotional Response in the Choice Mechanisms of Suburban Natural-Areas Users

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unique observations and experiences of users of suburban natural areas lead them to perceive their surroundings in a manner associated with their personal values. It follows that every individual has a unique cognitive decision-making structure. This paper examines users’ affective and cognitive evaluation of a particular suburban natural area by applying the means-end chain method to reveal the cognitive mechanism by which users link the attributes and benefits of an environmental public good with their own personal values. Analysis of a survey conducted of visitors to a Spanish suburban natural area (park) reveals the main attributes to be the opportunity to practice sports and proximity of the park and the main potential benefits to be the improvement of physical and psychological well-being. The desired personal values include fun, quality of life and self-fulfillment at the individual level and improved social relationships at the collective level. The paper also tests for cross-group, cognitive-structure differences in visitor groups, segmented by level of satisfaction and reported range of emotions, and finds that perceived physical and psychological health improvements and individual and social awareness increase with higher levels of satisfaction and emotional response. Therefore, the recommendations for natural area management suggested by these findings include enhancing the scenic beauty and peacefulness of suburban natural areas in order to improve the affective state of visitors because this could contribute to reducing social costs (including health care) within the area of influence of the natural area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This was developed in 2002 by Prof. Raffaele Zanoli and Dr. Simona Naspetti of the University of Ancona (IT) in cooperation with Leonardo Cigolini Gulesu and Antonio Ruccia of SKYMAX DG (IT).

References

  • Akama JS, Mukethe D (2003) Measuring tourist satisfaction with Kenya’s wildlife safari: a case study of Tsavo West National Park. Tourism Management 24:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araña JE, León CJ (2008) Do emotions matter? Stability of preferences under anchoring and emotional intensity effects. Ecological Economics 66:700–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araña JE, León CJ (2009) Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments: the role of emotions. Ecological Economics 68:2316–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audenaert A, Steenkamp J (1997) A consumer-oriented approach to the marketing of food products: application of means-end chain theory to the consumption of beef. In: Wierenga B, Van Tilburg A, Grunert K, Steenkamp JB, Wedel M (eds) Agricultural marketing and consumer behaviour in a changing world. Kluwer Academic

  • Bagozzi R, Dabholkar P (1994) Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: a mean end chain analysis. Psychology and Marketing 11:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Dabholkar PA (2000) Discursive psychology: an alternative conceptual foundation to means-end chain theory. Psychology and Marketing 17:535–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R, Baumgartner H, Pieters R (1998) Goal-directed emotions. Cognition and Emotion 12:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R, Gopinath M, Nyer PU (1999) The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 27:184–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrena R, Sánchez M (2009) Consumption frequency and degree of abstraction: a study using the laddering technique on beef consumers. Food Quality and Preference 20:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernarth K, Roschewitz A (2008) Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors` willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Management 89:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigné JE, Andreu L (2004) Modelo cognitivo-afectivo de la satisfacción en servicios de ocio y turismo. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 21:89–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigné JE, Andreu L, Gnoth J (2005) The theme park experience: an analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tourism Management 26:833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne H, Jenkins M (2005) Eliciting manager’s personal values: an adaptation of the laddering interview method. Organizational Research Methods 8:410–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G (2005) Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources 18:17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Raymond C (2007) The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 27:89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J, Harrison CM, Limb M (1988) People, parks and urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies 25:455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CY (1997) Using to computer simulation to manage the crowing problem in parks: a study. Landscape and Urban Planning 37:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu C (2005) Applying means-end chain theory to eliciting system requirements and understanding users’ perceptual orientations. Information and Management 42:455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chryssohoidis GM, Krystallis A (2005) Organic consumers` personal values research: testing and validating the list of values (LOV) scale and implementing a value-based segmentation task. Food Quality and Preference 16:585–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogoy M (1999) The consumer as a social and environmental actor. Ecological Economics 28:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles RW, Bussey SC (2000) Urban forest landscapes in the UK—progressing the social agenda. Landscape and Urban Planning 52:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coogan MA, Karash KH, Adler T, Sallis J (2007) The role of personal values, urban form, and auto availability in the analysis of walking for transportation. American Journal of Health Promotion 21(4):363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AIA, Dekker M, Jongen WMF (2004) An overview of means-end theory: potential application in consumer-oriented food product design. Trends in Food Science and Technology 15:403–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin JJ, Brady MK, Hult GTM (2000) Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing 76:193–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (2000) Management objectives for protection of ecosystem services. Environmental Science Policy 3:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport M, Borrie W, Freimund W, Manning R (2002) Assessing the relationship desired experiences and support for management actions at Yellowstone National Park using multiple methods. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 20:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rojas C, Camarero C (2008) Visitors’ experience, mood and satisfaction in a heritage context: evidence from an interpretation center. Tourism Management 29:525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Saz S, Suárez C (1998) El valor del uso recreativo de espacios naturales protegidos: aplicación del método de valoración contingente al Parque Natural de l’Albufera. Revista Española de Economía Agraria 182:239–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Saz-Salazar S, Rausell-Köster P (2008) A double-hurdle model of urban green areas valuation: dealing with zero responses. Landscape and Urban Planning 84:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Brown PJ (1975) A social–psychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning: assessing demand for outdoor recreation. United States Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, pp 65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnhart D (2001) Combining revealed and stated preference methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations. Land Economics 77:12–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farré PM (2003) El valor de uso recreativo de los espacios naturales protegidos. Una aplicación de los métodos de valoración contingente y del coste de viaje. Estudios de Economía Aplicada 21:297–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman L, Fleitelson E (2009) An application of the recreation level of service approach to forest in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning 89:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman L, Donnelly R, Fay J, Reeves R (2007) Applications of nestedness analyses to biodiversity conservation in developing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 81:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford R, Williams K, Bishop I, Webb T (2009) A value basis for the social acceptability of clearfelling in Tasmania, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 90:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E (2007) Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 83:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobster P, Westphal L (2004) The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning 68:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golicnik B, Ward TC (2010) Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 94:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González A (2002) La preocupación por la calidad del medio ambiente. Un modelo cognitivo sobre la conducta ecológica. Tesis doctoral Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert KG, Grunert SC (1995) Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: theorical considerations and methodological problems. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman J (1982) A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing 46:60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Ready R, Colombo S, Watson F, Stewart M, Bergmann E (2009) The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1404–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CC, Brown G (1992) Gain, loss, and personal responsibility: the role of motivation in resource valuation decision-making. Ecological Economics 5:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle DN (1965) The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

  • Howard JA (1977) Consumer behaviour: application of theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang S, Lee C, Chen HJ (2005) The relationship among tourists’ involvement, place attachment and interpretation satisfaction in Taiwan’s national parks. Tourism Management 26:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabarin A, Damhoureyeh S (2006) Estimating the recreational benefits of Dibeen National Park in Jordan using contingent valuation and travel cost methods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9:2198–2206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim C, Chen WY (2006) Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalhe LR (1985) The nine nations of North America and the value basis of geographic segmentation. Journal of Marketing 50:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T (2002) Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 59:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs Z, LeRoy C, Fischer D, Lubarsky S, Burke W (2006) How do aesthetics affect our ecology? Journal of Ecological Anthropology 10:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreninchyn K (2006) The only place to go and be in the city: women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meaning of a large urban park. Health and Place 12:631–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laros F, Steenkamp J (2005) Emotions in consumer behaviour: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research 58:1437–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Han S (2002) Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks tourism resources using contingent valuation method. Tourism Management 23:531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JA, Soutar G, Louviere J (2007) Measuring values using best-worst scaling: the LOV example. Psychology and Marketing 24:1043–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppard P, Russel C, Cox D (2004) Improving means-end-chain studies by using a ranking method to construct hierarchical value map. Food Quality and Preference 15:489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Mosquera N, Sánchez M (2011) The influence of personal values in the economic-use valuation of peri-urban green spaces: an application of the means-end chain theory. Tourism Management 32:875–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn N, Brown R (2003) Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas J, Verheij RA (2007) Are health benefits of physical activity in natural environments used in primary care by general practitioners in the Netherlands? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 6:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning RE (2003) What to do about crowding and solitude in parks and wilderness? A reply to Stewart and Cole. Journal Leisure Research 35:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo LC (2003) Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer F, Frantz C (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:503–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Miele M, Parisi V (2000, March) Consumer concerns about animal welfare and food choice. Italian report on laddering interviews

  • Mill G, Van Rensburg T, Hynes S, Dooley C (2007) Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: citizen and consumer perspectives. Ecological Economics 60:642–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Múgica M, De Lucio J (1996) The role of on-site experience on landscape preferences. A case study at Doñana National Park (Spain). Journal of Environmental Management 47:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuvomen M, Sievänen T, Tönnes S, Koskela T (2007) Access to green areas and the frequency of visits—a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 6:235–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguz D (2000) User surveys of Ankara’s urban park. Landscape and Urban Planning 52:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 17:460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1997) Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JC, Reynolds TJ (1983) Understanding consumers’ cognitive structure: implications for advertising strategy. In: Percy L, Woodside A (eds) Advertising and consumer psychology. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oom do Valle P, Albino J, Mendes J, Guerreiro M (2006) Tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty intention: a structural and categorical analysis. International Journal Science and Applied Management 1:25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan S, Ryan C (2007) Mountain areas and visitor usage-motivations and determinants satisfaction: the case of Pirongia forest park, New Zeland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 15(3):288–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters R, Baumgartner H, Allen D (1995) A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pooley J, O’Connor M (2000) Environmental education and attitudes: emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behaviour 32:711–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell A (1992) Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of landscape. Journal of Environmental Management 34:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausell J, Pratt G (1980) A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relph E (1976) Place and placelessness. Pion, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds T, Gutman J (1988) Laddering theory: method, analysis and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research 28:11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins M (1997) Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research 24:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez I, San Martín H (2008) Tourist satisfaction: a cognitive-affective model. Annals of Tourism Research 35:551–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roovers P, Hermy M, Gulinck H (2002) Visitors profile, perceptions and expectations in forest from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 59:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell C, Flight I, Leppard P, Van Lawick V, Syrette J, Cox D (2004) A comparison of paper-and-pencil and computerized methods of hard laddering. Food Quality and Preference 15:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanesi G, Chiarello F (2006) Residents and urban green spaces. The case of Bari. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeesters D, Warlop L, Cornelissen G, Vanden Abeele P (2003) Consumer motivation to recycle when recycling is mandatory: two explanatory studies. Journal of Economy and Management 48:451–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern P, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano G, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review 6:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Hofstede F, Audenaert A, Steenkamp J, Wedel M (1998) An investigation into the association pattern technique as a quantitative approach to measuring means-end chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing 15:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Togridou A, Hovardad T, Pantis J (2006) Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecological Economics 60:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge J, Moore S (2007) Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: a western Australian case study. Tourism Management 28:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiros M, Mittal V (2000) Regret: a model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 26:401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L, Vaänanen H (1998) The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning 43:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L, Mäikinen K, Schipperijn J (2007) Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velarde M, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes—landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban forestry and Urban Greening 6:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining J, Schroeder H (1989) The effects of perceived crowding, resource scarcity, and information bias on emotions and environmental decisions. Environmental Management 13:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BA, Olson JC (1991) Means-end chains: connecting products with self. Journal of Business Research 22(2):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DR, Vaske JJ (2002) The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalisability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49:830–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter C, Lockwood M (2005) A model for measuring natural area values and park preferences. Environmental Conservation 32:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Prozesky H, Esler K (2007) A case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Management 40:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz S, Zengin M, Yildiz N (2007) Determination of user profile at city parks: a sample from Turkey. Building and Environment 42:2325–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young S, Feigin B (1975) Using the benefit chain for improved strategy formulation. Journal of Marketing 39:72–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Pfueller S, Whitelaw P (2010) Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River Region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management 45:896–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zube E (1987) Environmental perception and contemporary perceptual theory. Landscape Ecology 1:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by a Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Project No. AGL-2009-13303-CO2-01). The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers of this paper and to the editors for their careful reading of the paper and their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mercedes Sanchez.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Laddering Interview

Using the tables below, first identify the relations between the characteristics of Monte San Pedro Park and the consequences of your visit as you see them and then the relations between those consequences and the benefits you wish to obtain from your visit. In both tables, you are asked to indicate linkages between the rows and the columns. The idea in the first table is to tick a box (or boxes) to indicate the link(s) between each characteristic (a1, a2…a13) and the benefit(s), in your experience, that it provides (c1, c2…c22). In the second table, you are asked to do the same to link each benefit in the columns (c1, c2…c22) with the personal value(s) to which, from your experience, you think it caters (v1, v2…v9).

Table of AC linkages (link attributes [a1, a2 . . .] with consequences [c1, c2, c3 . . .])

  

Price

Recreational facilities provided

Less noise

Better health

Distance from home

Landscape beauty

Closeness to nature

A place to practice a sport

a1

a2

a3

a4

a5

a6

a7

a8

c1

I have good ecological habits

        

c2

Stress relief/relaxation

        

c3

Physical well-being/improved fitness

        

c4

Rest

        

c5

I help the environment

        

c6

A way to escape from routine

        

c7

Frequency of use

        

c8

Mental well-being

        

Table of CV linkages (link consequences [c1, c2, c3…] with values [v1, v2, v3…])

  

Sense of social belonging

Source of fun, pleasure and enjoyment

Better relations with others

Enhances my quality of life and security

Sense of self-fulfillment and accomplishment

Emotional stimulation

Being respected by others

Pease of mind, dignity, and self-respect

I’m more successful

v1

v2

v3

v4

v5

v6

v7

v8

v9

c1

I have good ecological habits

         

c2

Stress relief/relaxation

         

c3

Physical well-being/improved fitness

         

c4

Rest

         

c5

I help the environment

         

c6

A way to escape from routine

         

c7

Frequency of use

         

c8

Mental well-being

         

Appendix 2: Scales

Satisfaction Scale

“Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements referring to satisfaction with the __________________ green space using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest level of agreement”

Satisfaction obtained from…

Score

I am satisfied with the park as it is

 

I am happy with the recreational services it has to offer

 

I am happy with both the physical and psychological benefits I gain from being there

 

I am pleased with the park

 

I prefer to visit Mont San Pedro Park rather than other suburban natural areas Corunna has to offer

 

My experience of using and enjoying the park is satisfactory

 

Emotional Scale

In addition to the features you value in a suburban natural area such as _______, you may experience a range of emotions as you use and enjoy it. Please rate the extent to which you experience the following feelings or emotions? Your scores can range from 1 to 5, where 5 represents the highest level.

Emotions

Score

Anger, rage

 

Discontentment

 

Worry

 

Sadness

 

Fear

 

Shame

 

Envy

 

Loneliness

 

Romantic love

 

Love

 

Peace

 

Contentment

 

Optimism

 

Enjoyment

 

Excitement

 

Surprise

 

Guilt

 

Pride

 

Impatience

 

Relief, consolation

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopez-Mosquera, N., Sanchez, M. The Role of Satisfaction and Emotional Response in the Choice Mechanisms of Suburban Natural-Areas Users. Environmental Management 49, 174–191 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9753-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9753-x

Keywords

Navigation