Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A System Method for the Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in Mountain Watershed Areas: The Case of the “Giffre” Watershed (France)

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last fifty years, many mountain watersheds in temperate countries have known a progressive change from self-standing agro-silvo-pastoral systems to leisure dominated areas characterized by a concentration of tourist accommodations, leading to a drinking water peak during the winter tourist season, when the water level is lowest in rivers and sources. The concentration of water uses increases the pressure on “aquatic habitats” and competition between uses themselves. Consequently, a new concept was developed following the international conferences in Dublin (International Conference on Water and the Environment – ICWE) and Rio de Janeiro (UN Conference on Environment and Development), both in 1992, and was broadly acknowledged through international and European policies. It is the concept of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM). It meets the requirements of different uses of water and aquatic zones whilst preserving the natural functions of such areas and ensuring a satisfactory economic and social development. This paper seeks to evaluate a local water resources management system in order to implement it using IWRM in mountain watersheds. The assessment method is based on the systemic approach to take into account all components influencing a water resources management system at the watershed scale. A geographic information system was built to look into interactions between water resources, land uses, and water uses. This paper deals specifically with a spatial comparison between hydrologically sensitive areas and land uses. The method is applied to a French Alps watershed: the Giffre watershed (a tributary of the Arve in Haute-Savoie). The results emphasize both the needs and the gaps in implementing IWRM in vulnerable mountain regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agenda 21 (1992) A Guide to Agenda 21. A global partnership. UNCED, Geneva, p 115

  • Ako AA, Eyong GET, Nkeng GE (2010) Water resources management (IWRM) in Cameroon. Water Resources Management 24:871–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy JA, Walker DH, McDonald GT, Syme GJ (2001) A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives. Journal of Environmental Management 63(4):407–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry KA, Mollard E (2009) Social participation in water governance and management. Earthscan, London, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnel M (2004) How do we move from ideas to action? The role of the HELP programme. International Journal of Water Resources Development 20(3):283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton J (2003) Integrated water resources management on a basin level. In: A training manual, MultiMondes (edn.). International Hydrological Programme of UNESCO, Montreal, p 240

  • Charnay B (2010) For an integrated water resources management in mountain areas. The case of Giffre watershed (Haute-Savoie), PhD, p 504. Availabe at: http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00472979/fr/. Accessed 13 Apr 2010

  • Collins K, Blackmore C, Morris D, Watson D (2007) A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environmental Science and Policy 10(6):564–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Rosnay J (1979) The Macroscope. Harper and Row, New York, p 314

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) The new generation of watershed management programs and projects. FAO, Rome, p 128

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007) Why invest in watershed management. FAO, Rome, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (2003) Forests and waters guidelines, 4th edn. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, p 66

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick P, Loh P, Gomez S, Morrison JP (1995) California water 2020. A sustainable vision. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, Oakland, p 113

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Partnership (2000) Integrated water management. Technical committee, background paper no. 4. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm, p 80

  • Global Water Partnership (2004) Catalyzing change: a handbook for developing integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency strategies. Elanders, Stockholm, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Partnership, International Network of Basin Organizations (2009) A Handbook for integrated water resources management in basins. Elanders, Stockholm, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedelin B (2007) Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management. Environmental Management 39(2):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Office for Water (2001) Recommendations guide for improved water management between the head of water basin and the downstream areas. International Office for Water, Limoges, p 64

  • Liniger HP, Weingartner R, Grosjean M, Kull C, MacMillan L, Messerli B, Bisaz A, Lutz U (1998) Mountains of the world, water towers for the 21st Century––a contribution to global freshwater management. Mountain Agenda, Paul Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerli B, Ives JD (1997) Mountains of the World. A global priority. Parthenon Publishing, New York, p 496

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountain Agenda (1997) Mountains of the worlds: challenges for the 21st century. Geographical Institute, University of Bern, Bern, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret S, Farolfi S, Hassan R (2006) Water governance for sustainable development. Quae Editions, Versailles

    Google Scholar 

  • Price M, Hofer T (2005) The international year of mountains, 2002: progress and prospects. In: Thompson DBA, Price MF, Galbraith CA (eds) The Mountains of Northern Europe: conservation, management, people and nature. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, pp 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2000) Heritage and integrated water resources management in mountain resorts. The case of Crans-Montana-Aminona and Nendaz. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne p 371

  • Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance, TEC background papers no. 7. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee (TEC), Stockholm

  • Tarlock AD (2007) Integrated water resources management: theory and practice. In: Wouters P et al. (eds.) Implementing integrated water resources management in Central Asia. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–21

  • Turton AR, Hattingh HJ, Maree GA, Roux DJ, Classen M, Strydom WF (2007) Governance as a trialogue: government–society–science in transition. Springer, Berlin, p 354

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2009) IWRM guidelines at river basin level. International Hydrological Programme of UNESCO, Moscow, p 320

  • UN Water (2008) Status report on integrated water resources management and water efficiency plans, Report. UN-Water from DFID (edn). p 45

  • Van Hofwegen P (2001) Framework for assessment of institutional frameworks for integrated water resources management. In: Abernethy CL (ed.) Intersectoral management of river basins. International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, pp 137–160

  • Ward FA (2009) Economics in integrated water management. Environmental Modelling and Software 24(8):948–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingari PC, Achouri M (2007) Five years after Shiga: recent developments in forest and water policy and implementation. Unasylva 58(229):56–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the Ministry of Education and Research and Pays de Savoie Department within the frame of the Water in Mountains program. The study was performed for a geography PhD defended in March 2010 at EDYTEM laboratory. It benefited from the invaluable contributions of PhD supervisors Mr. Prof. J.-J Delannoy and Mr. A. Marnezy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bérengère Charnay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charnay, B. A System Method for the Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in Mountain Watershed Areas: The Case of the “Giffre” Watershed (France). Environmental Management 48, 189–197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9683-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9683-7

Keywords

Navigation