Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Road and Rail Side Vegetation Management Implications of Habitat Use by Moose Relative to Brush Cutting Season

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plants cut at different times produce resprouts that vary in their nutritional value relative to when they are cut. To determine how vegetation management in transportation (road and rail) corridors at different times of the year could influence browse quality in the years following cutting, and how this could potentially influence encounters between herbivores and vehicles, we undertook a 3-year study. In 2001, at a wildlife viewing area near Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, we established a control area and treatment areas where shrubs and trees that are used as food by moose (Alces alces) were cut at the beginning of June, July, August, September, and October. In the fall, moose were most often observed browsing the resprouts of plants cut in August (years 1 and 2 post-treatment) and September (year 3). Cumulative winter track counts were highest in the uncut control area in the years following cutting. Spring pellet counts revealed that most pellets were deposited in the uncut (years 1 and 2) and August-cut (year 3) areas during winter. With the exception of the first year after cutting, browse removal by moose was highest for plants cut later in the growing season. Overall, our findings suggest that following cutting, plants cut later in the year are selected more often by moose relative to those cut earlier. To reduce browse use of corridor vegetation in areas where concerns for moose-vehicle collisions exist, we recommend that vegetation maintenance activities be conducted in the early summer months of June and July.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpe MJ, Kingery JL, Mosley JC (1999) Effects of summer sheep grazing on browse nutritive quality in autumn and winter. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzo JA, Beasom SL, Fulbright TE (1992) White-tailed deer use of rangeland following browse rejuvenation. Journal of Range Management 45:496–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Danell K, Provenza F, Reichardt PB, Clausen TA, Werner RA (1991) Effects of mammal browsing on the chemistry of deciduous woody plants. In: Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ (eds) Phytochemical induction by herbivores. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, pp 135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Kuropat PJ (1980) Selection of winter forage by sub-arctic browsing vertebrates-the role of plant chemistry. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:261–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danell K, Huss-Danell K, Bergström R (1985) Interactions between browsing moose and two species of birch in Sweden. Ecology 66:1867–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2010) Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/. Accessed April 2010

  • Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1996) Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservation Biology 10:1059–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen H, Andreassen HP, Storaas T (1998) Spatial and temporal correlates to Norwegian moose-train collisions. Alces 34:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutteridge RC (1997) The productivity of Tipuana tipu under three cutting regimes in southeast Queensland. Agroforestry Systems 35:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty LH, Box TW, Malechek JC (1988) Season of cutting affects biomass production by coppicing browse species of the Brazilian caatinga. Journal of Range Management 41:477–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härkönen S, Heikkilä R (1999) Use of pellet group counts in determining density and habitat use of moose Alces alces in Finland. Wildlife Biology 5:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaren V, Andersen R, Ulleberg M, Pedersen PH, Wiseth B (1991) Moose–train collisions: the effects of vegetation removal with a cost-benefit analysis. Alces 27:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KJ, Happe PJ, Wright RG (1990) Evaluating above-snow browse availability using nonlinear regressions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays JS, Canham CD (1991) Effects of time and frequency of cutting on hardwood root reserves and sprout growth. Forest Science 37:524–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen NA, Rea RV (2008) What do we know about nocturnal activity of moose? Alces 44:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavsund S, Sandegren F (1991) Moose–vehicle relations in Sweden: a review. Alces 27:118–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Machida S (1979) Differential use of willow species by moose in Alaska. Thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, USA

  • Meidinger D, Pojar J (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Special Report Series 6, Victoria, Canada

  • Milliken GA, Johnson DE (1984) Analysis of messy data: vol I. Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, New York, USA

  • Oetting RB, Cassell JF (1970) Effects of interstate corridor mowing on wildlife, snow buildup, and motorist opinion in North Dakota: a preliminary report. National Research Council, Highway Research Board, Report Number IRN10063353

  • Peek FW, Bellis ED (1969) Deer movements and behaviour along an interstate highway. Highway Research News 36:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner DF (1978) Some relationships between moose and willow in the Fort Providence, N.W.T. area. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Porter GL (1990) Willow species of disturbed sites in the S.B.S. zone in north-central B.C. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, FRDA handbook 004, Victoria, Canada

  • Puglisi MJ, Lindzey JS, Bellis ED (1974) Factors associated with highway mortality of white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:799–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea RV (1999) Response of Scouler’s willow (Salix scouleriana) to mechanical brushing: implications to the quality of winter browse for Moose (Alces alces). Thesis, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada

  • Rea RV (2003) Modifying roadside vegetation management practices to reduce vehicular collisions with moose (Alces alces). Wildlife Biology 9:81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea RV (2005) The influence of brush-cutting time on plant resprouting and attractiveness to herbivores: implications for road and rail side vegetation management. Unpublished Report. Prince George, BC, Canada

  • Rea RV, Child KN, Spata DP, MacDonald D (2007) Influence of cutting time on brush response: implications for herbivory in linear (transportation) corridors. Environmental Management 40:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea RV, Gillingham MP (2001) The impact of the timing of brush management on the nutritional value of woody browse for moose (Alces alces). Journal of Applied Ecology 38:710–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regelin WL, Schwartz CC, Franzmann AW (1987) Effects of forest succession on nutritional dynamics of moose forage. Swedish Wildlife Research Supplement 1:247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Renecker LA, Schwartz CC (1998) Food habits and feeding behaviour. In: Franzmann AW, Schwartz CS (eds) Ecology and management of the North American moose. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 403–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Risenhoover KL (1987) Winter foraging strategies of moose in subarctic and boreal forest habitats. Dissertation, Michigan Technical University, Houghton, USA

  • Schwab FE, Pitt MD (1987) Comparison of a direct and an indirect method for estimating available winter browse. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15:544–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Gross JE, Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT, Wunder BA (1994) The scaling of intake rate in mammalian herbivores. American Naturalist 143:1055–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sielecki LE (2000) WARS wildlife accident reporting system 1999 annual report (1995–1999 synopsis). British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Highways, Victoria, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank K. Litwinow and the many research assistants and student volunteers who worked tirelessly to collect field data. Major funding for this project was provided by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, British Columbia Rail and the University of Northern British Columbia. Brownridge and Company Insurance Services, Sussex Insurance Agency and Nauroth & Associates Insurance Brokers also provided financial support. O. Hjeljord, G. Hesse and four anonymous reviewers provided constructive and welcomed feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy V. Rea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rea, R.V., Child, K.N., Spata, D.P. et al. Road and Rail Side Vegetation Management Implications of Habitat Use by Moose Relative to Brush Cutting Season. Environmental Management 46, 101–109 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9502-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9502-6

Keywords

Navigation