Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hawaiian Residents’ Preferences for Miconia Control Program Attributes Using Conjoint Choice Experiment and Latent Class Analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive species control or eradication is an important issue. On the islands of Hawaii, this problem is exceedingly evident when it comes to Miconia calvescens (Miconia). Adequate funding is needed to control or eradicate this invasive plant, but with the limited amount of funding available for the fight against Miconia, it is important to make sure that the fund is being spent in a way that addresses the needs or preferences of the Hawaiian residents. Using the conjoint choice experiment method, we designed a survey that would measure the Hawaiian residents’ willingness to support Miconia control program attributes. The attributes focused on were cost, biodiversity loss, extent of spread and soil erosion. Latent class approach was used to assess the surveyed population to see the different preferences by individual classes. The results show three different classes or groups of individuals with varying preferences for a control program of which cost and erosion were the top preferred attributes among the classes. These groups were defined by their socio-demographics of income, the length of residency and exposure to farming/gardening activities. Even with a preference for lower cost, a group showed willingness to pay more ($2.40) for a program that reduces erosion from high to low. Finally, the biodiversity attribute had very low consideration from a majority of the respondents showing the need for educating the public regarding its importance in preserving the unique environment in Hawaii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL (2002) Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental & Resource Economics 23(4):421–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattin P, Wittink DR (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing 46(Summer):44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimera CG, Medeiros AC, Loope LL, Hobdy RH (2000) Status of management and control efforts for the invasive alien tree Miconia calvescens DC. (Melastomataceae) in Hana, East Maui. In: PCSU Technical Report #128

  • Colombo S, Hanley N, Louviere J (2008) Modelling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture. Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2008–28, University of Stirling, Department of Economics

  • Cox GW (1999) Alien species in North America and Hawaii: impacts on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC 400 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • DBEDT (2005) 2005 Annual Visitor Research Report, State of Hawaii. Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism, Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  • DBEDT (2009) Annual estimates of the resident population for counties of Hawaii: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008. State of Hawaii, Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism, Honolulu, HI. Retrieved 06/30/09 at: http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/info/census/popestimate/2008-county-population-hawaii/CO_EST2008_01_15.pdf

  • Florence J (1996) Statut IUCN des plants vasculaires endémiques de polynésie française et recommendations de potection. Papeete, Délégation à l’Environment

  • Green PE, Wind Y (1975) New ways to measure consumers’ judgements. Harvard Business Review 53(July–August): 89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH, Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37(8):681–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Chintagunta PK (1994) On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. Journal of Marketing Research 32:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbrendt CK, Wirth FF, Vaughn GF (1991) Conjoint analysis of the mid-atlantic food-fish market for farm raised hybrid striped bass. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbrendt CK, Wang Q, Fraiz C, O’Dierno L (1995) Marketing Problems and Opportunities in Mid-Atlantic Seafood Retailing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(5, Proceedings Issue (Dec)):1313–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Mourato S, Wright RE (2001) Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3):435–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher DA (1994) Stated preference analysis of travel chices: the state of practice. Transportation 21:107–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber J (2005) Conjoint analysis: how we got here and where we are (An Update). Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R, Orme B (2003) Getting the most from CBC. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Accessed online: http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/education/techpap.shtml

  • Kaiser B (2006) Economic impacts of non-indigenous species: Miconia and the Hawaiian economy. Euphytica 148:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D (donnal@ufl.edu) (21 Oct 2006). RE: Miconia costs. E-mailed to: Halbrendt, C (chanhalb@hawaii.edu)

  • Le Maitre DC, van Wilgen BW, Gelderblom CM, Bailey C, Chapmen RA, Nel JA (2002) Invasive alien trees and water resources in South Africa: case studies of the costs and benefits of management. Forest Ecology and Management 160:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loope L (1997) HNIS Report for Miconia calvescens. Accessed online November 2, 2006: http://www.hear.org/MiconiaInHawaii/

  • Louviere JJ, Woodworth GG (1983) Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregated data. Journal of Marketing Research 20:350–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) State Choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden DS (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros AC, Loope LL, Conant P (1997) Status, ecology, and management of the invasive plant, Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 48:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JY, Florence J (1996) Tahiti’s Naive flora endangered by the invasion of Miconia calvescens DC. Journal of Biogeography 23(Nov., 1996):775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen JY, Saijo T (2007) Does energy efficiency label alter consumers’ purchase decision? A latent class approach on Shanghai Data. Accessed online January 2008(DP-2007-E-005): http://www.osipp.osaka-u.ac.jp/archives/DP/2007/DP2007E005.pdf

  • Smith R (smithrya@hawaii.edu) (12 Oct 2006) RE: Historical Program Costs. E-mailed to L. Thomas (lynnatho@hawaii.edu)

  • Swait JR (1994) A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 1:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travisi CM, Nijkamp P (2004) Willingness to pay for agricultural environmental safety. In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers No. 04-070/3, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • US Census Bureau (2005) 2005 American Community Survey. Accessed online February 17, 2007:http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ADPTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=04000US15&r_name=ACS_2005_EST_G00_DP3&-gc_url=null&-ds_name=&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false

  • Vermunt JK, Magidson J (2005) Technical guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: basic and advanced. Statistical Innovations Inc., Belmont, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Volckner F, Hofmann J (2007) The price-perceived quality relationship: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants. Marketing Letters 18(3):191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Services McIntire-Stennis Program for funding the Miconia project. We would also like to thank all the people who were involved in this project such as the experts, surveyors and survey location management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Chan-Halbrendt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan-Halbrendt, C., Lin, T., Yang, F. et al. Hawaiian Residents’ Preferences for Miconia Control Program Attributes Using Conjoint Choice Experiment and Latent Class Analysis. Environmental Management 45, 250–260 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9415-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9415-4

Keywords

Navigation