Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

China’s Classification-Based Forest Management: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s new Classification-Based Forest Management (CFM) is a two-class system, including Commodity Forest (CoF) and Ecological Welfare Forest (EWF) lands, so named according to differences in their distinct functions and services. The purposes of CFM are to improve forestry economic systems, strengthen resource management in a market economy, ease the conflicts between wood demands and public welfare, and meet the diversified needs for forest services in China. The formative process of China’s CFM has involved a series of trials and revisions. China’s central government accelerated the reform of CFM in the year 2000 and completed the final version in 2003. CFM was implemented at the provincial level with the aid of subsidies from the central government. About a quarter of the forestland in China was approved as National EWF lands by the State Forestry Administration in 2006 and 2007. Logging is prohibited on National EWF lands, and their landowners or managers receive subsidies of about 70 RMB (US$10) per hectare from the central government. CFM represents a new forestry strategy in China and its implementation inevitably faces challenges in promoting the understanding of forest ecological services, generalizing nationwide criteria for identifying EWF and CoF lands, setting up forest-specific compensation mechanisms for ecological benefits, enhancing the knowledge of administrators and the general public about CFM, and sustaining EWF lands under China’s current forestland tenure system. CFM does, however, offer a viable pathway toward sustainable forest management in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai TJ, Jiang MX (2005) Forest classification management: theory practice and visualization. Science Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai TJ, Kong FB, Jiang DT (2003) Present situation, problem and countermeasure of forest classified management in China. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 31:42–44 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LS, Cai TJ, Jiang DT, Jiang MX (1998) Principles, bases, and suggestions of forest classifications and divisions. Research on Forestry Work 1998(12):29–36 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LS, Cai TJ, Jiang DT (1999) Study on divisional principles and basis of forest classification management of Heilongjiang province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 27(3):1–6 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen RY, Yan SJ, Wu CZ (2004) The compensation mechanism for ecological benefit of forest under the classification management situation. System Sciences and Comprenhensive Studies in Agriculture 20(2):157–160 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng RY, Yan SJ, Wu CZ (2004) Ecological subsidies under classification-based forest management. Systems Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture 20:157–160 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong JX, Duan YZ, Gao CS (2002) A study and demonstration on forest division for classification management in Kunming. Journal of Southeast Forestry College 22(1):23–28 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Reform Office (FRO) of the State Forestry Administration (SFA) (2008) Guide of the Central Governmental Plan for Promoting Collective Forestland Ownership Reform throughout China. China’s Forestry Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman P, Finn P (2007) Corruption stains timber trade. Washington Post, April 1, p A1

  • Guo YP (2002) The summary of Xinjiang forest classification management work. Xinjiang Forestry 2:8–9 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo ZW, Gan YL, Li YM (2003) Spatial pattern of ecosystem function and ecosystem conservation. Environmental Management 32(6):682–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He CC (2005) Discuss the problems about forest classification management. Forest Inventory and Planning 30:7–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong J, Cai TJ (2002) Forest classification management compartmentalizing based on GIS. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 30(4):14–18 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu CX, Fu BJ, Chen LD, Gulinck H (2006) Farmer’s attitudes towards the Grain-for-Green programme in the Loess hilly area, China: a case study in two small catchments. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 13:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang G, Chan CHW (2006) China’s impact on forests in Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 36:167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li WH (2004) Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. Forest Ecology and Management 201:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang XQ (2001) Forest classification management. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin J (1999) Studies on technical criteria and index system for classifying public benefit forest and commodity forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 1999(4):23–28 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CX, Ma XJ (2001) A preliminary study on forest division methods of classified management. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology 30(6):22–24 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu WP (1996) Research of classification-based forest management. Problems of Forest Technology 1996(5):1–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu QB, Liu MG (2005) The necessity for establishing the compensatory institution of forest ecological benefit in classified forest management. Forest Inventory and Planning 30:54–56 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Zhang SG, Ye JZ, Wang YH (2004) Forestry revenue policy in China: what has happened and why. International Forestry Review 6:335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer AL, Kauppi PE, Angelstam PK, Zhang Y, Tikka PM (2005) Importing timber, exporting ecological impact. Science 308:359–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson SD (1990) Forests and forestry in China. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross L, Silk MA (1987) Environmental law and policy in the People’s Republic of China. Quorum Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA (State Forestry Administration) (1995) A general guideline of forestry economics reform. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA (State Forestry Administration) (1999) A memorandum on the nationwide classifications of forestland. Internal Document of Chinese Government, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA (State Forestry Administration) (2000) Technical criteria of classifying ecological welfare and commodity forests. Internal Document of Chinese Government, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA (State Forestry Administration) (2003) Technical regulations of forest inventory and planning in China. Internal Document of Chinese Government, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA State Forestry Administration (2004a) China Forestry Statistical Yearbook in 2003. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA (State Forestry Administration) (2004b) Methods of checking the key national-level welfare forests. Internal Document of Chinese Government, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao GF, Zhang PC, Bai GX, Zhao G, Wang Z (2001) Ecological classification system for China’s natural forests: protection and management. Acta Ecologia Sinica 21:1564–1568 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang TF, He MJ, Yu XH (2002) Concerns about forest classification with remote sensing technology. Xinjiang Forestry 2002(3):12–13 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang LN, Wang QL, Shao GF, Dai LM, Wang SZ, Li X, Xu D (2006) Digitally determining forest inventory units with an ecological classification system. Science in China (Series E Technological Sciences) 49(Suppl I):118–127

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (1992) Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June

  • Wagner RG, Little KM, Richardson B, McNabb K (2006) The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world’s forests. Forestry 79:57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H (2004) Discussion on forest resources management countermeasures in classified forest management. Forest Resources Management 5:29–32 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, van Kooten GC, Wilson B (2004) Mosaic of reform: forest policy in post-1978 China. Forest Policy and Economics 6:71–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SZ, Shao GF, Gu HY, Wang QL, Dai LM (2006) A geographic information systems approach for classifying and mapping forest management categories in Baihe Forestry Bureau, Northeast China. Forest Research 17:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao CT, Liu JF, Dai GC, Yan CL, Yan WH, Miao GP, Wang L (2008) An investigation report on the policy of regional forest ecological compensations. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.cn/sub/FstArticle.aspx?id=kjyj.275.2008-05-29 (in Chinese)

  • Yuan LF (2003) Problems about the classification and management forest in China. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology 31:59–62 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XG (2001) Discussion of countermeasures for implementation of forest classification management in Jiangxi Province. Jiangxi Forestry Technology 2001(2):42–43 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang PC, Shao GF, Zhao G, LeMaster DC, Parker GR, Dunning JB, Li QL (2000) Ecology: China’s forest policy for the 21st century. Science 288(5474):2135–2136 (23 June)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YF, Tachibana S, Nagata S (2006) Impact of socio-economic factors on the changes in forest areas in China. Forest Policy and Economics 9:63–76 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Shao GF (2002) Logging restrictions in China: a turning point for forest sustainability. Journal of Forestry 100:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng SQ (2001) The problems and management measures of classification-based forest management in Liaoning Province. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology 2001(1):15–17 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SX (2006) Forestry in China: historical transitions and industry developments. Thomson, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LX, Song JC (2002) The problem about policy and management system of classification-based forest management. South-Central Forest Inventory and Planning 21:15–17 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2006BAD03A09), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC40873067), and the 863 Program (2006AA10Z251). We would like to thank the Academy of Forest Investigation and Planning for providing the information about Classification-Based Forest Management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guofan Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, L., Zhao, F., Shao, G. et al. China’s Classification-Based Forest Management: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects. Environmental Management 43, 1162–1173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9229-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9229-9

Keywords

Navigation