Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Conflict-Resolution Model for the Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Resources that Considers Water-Quality Issues: A Case Study

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources is one alternative for optimal use of available water resources in arid and semiarid regions. The optimization models proposed for conjunctive water allocation are often complicated, nonlinear, and computationally intensive, especially when different stakeholders are involved that have conflicting interests. In this article, a new conflict-resolution methodology developed for the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources using Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Young Conflict-Resolution Theory (YCRT) is presented. The proposed model is applied to the Tehran aquifer in the Tehran metropolitan area of Iran. Stakeholders in the study area have conflicting interests related to water supply with acceptable quality, pumping costs, groundwater quality, and groundwater table fluctuations. In the proposed methodology, MODFLOW and MT3D groundwater quantity and quality simulation models are linked with the NSGA-II optimization model to develop Pareto fronts among the objectives. The best solutions on the Pareto fronts are then selected using YCRT. The results of the proposed model show the significance of applying an integrated conflict-resolution approach to conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown LD (1995) Managing conflict among groups. In: Kolb DA, Osland JS, Rubin IM (eds) The organizational behaviour reader, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 317–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Marchiori C, Sgobbi A (2005) Applications of negotiation theory to water issues. University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Department of Economics Research Paper Series No. 09/06, FEEM Working Paper No. 65.05, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3641

  • Coppola E Jr, Szidarovszky F (2004) Conflict between water supply and environmental health risk: a computational neural network approach. International Game Theory Review 6:475–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Datta B (2001) Application of optimization in groundwater quantity and quality management. Sadhana 26:293–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II., KANGAL Rep. No. 200001. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6:182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn JL, Ranjithan S (2003) Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in watershed water quality management. In: Fonseca et al (eds) Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2632. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 692–706

  • Gopalakrishnan C, Levy J, Li KW, Hipel KW (2005) Water allocation among multiple stakeholders: conflict analysis of the Waiahole water project. Hawaii Water Resources Development 21:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer MJ, Hammer MJ Jr (1996) Water and wastewater technology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh AW, McDonald MG (1996) User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference groundwater flow model. Open file report 96-485. United States Geological Survey

  • Karamouz M, Kerachian R, Zahraie B (2004) Monthly water resources and irrigation planning: case study of conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 130:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Rezapour Tabari MM, Kerachian R (2007) Application of genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks in conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. Water International 32:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2006) Optimal reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: a deterministic and stochastic conflict resolution approach. Water Resources Research 42:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2007) A stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in reservoir-river systems. Advances in Water Resources 30:866–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejano RP, Davos CA (1995) Cost allocation of multiagency water resource projects: game theoretic approaches and case study. Water Resources Research 31:1387–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loaiciga HA (2004) Analytic game-theoretic approach to groundwater extraction. Journal of Hydrology 297:22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napel S (2002) Bilateral bargaining: theory and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed MR, Minsker BS (2004) Striking the balance: long-term groundwater monitoring design for conflicting objectives. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management 130:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards A, Singh N (1996) Two level negotiations in bargaining over water. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, pp 1–23

  • Salazar R, Szidarovszky F, Coppola E Jr, Rojana A (2007) Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(4):560–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirangi E, Kerachian R, Bajestan SM (2008) A simplified model for reservoir operation considering the water quantity issues: Application of the Young Conflict Resolution Theory. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-0061-0

  • Supalla R, Klaus B, Yeboah O, Bruins R (2002) A game theory approach to deciding who will supply instream flow water. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:959–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yandamuri SRM, Srinivasan K, Bhallamudi SM (2006) Multiobjective optimal waste load allocation models for rivers using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management 132:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh WW-G (1992) Systems analysis in ground-water planning and management. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management 118:224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1993) An evolutionary model of bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory 59:145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Wang PP (1999) A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems, documentation and user’s guide, United States Army Corp of Engineers, Washington, DC, 220 pp

Download references

Acknowledgements

The technical contributions of Barbara S. Minsker (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL) and Hossein Sedghi, (Department of Hydraulic Structures, Islamic Azad Univesity—Tehran Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran) are acknowledged. The authors also thank anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that improved the quality of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hydraulic Structures, Islamic Azad University – Tehran Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Bazargan-Lari

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University – East Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Bazargan-Lari

  3. Center of Excellence for Infrastructure Engineering and Management, School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Reza Kerachian

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, Postgraduate School, Islamic Azad University – South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Abbas Mansoori

Authors
  1. Mohammad Reza Bazargan-Lari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reza Kerachian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abbas Mansoori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Kerachian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazargan-Lari, M.R., Kerachian, R. & Mansoori, A. A Conflict-Resolution Model for the Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Resources that Considers Water-Quality Issues: A Case Study . Environmental Management 43, 470–482 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9191-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9191-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation