Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing and Mitigating the Effects of Windblown Soil on Rare and Common Vegetation

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acting under the auspices of the US Endangered Species Act, we quantified wind erosion and its effects on rare and common plant species on a semi-arid military installation in Hawaii. Our goal was to develop management strategies, based on local data, to aid the conservation of rare and common indigenous plants and their habitats. We collected windblown soil coming off of roads and other disturbed soils to assess likely impacts to plants occurring at certain heights and distances from disturbed surfaces. We then subjected plants in a glasshouse to windblown dust treatments, designed from our field data to simulate erosion events, and evaluated the effect of these treatments on photosynthesis and survival. We also designed several field experiments to examine the in-situ effects of windblown soil and soil substrate on germination, growth rate, and survival of indigenous and nonindigenous plants. We conclude from these experiments that most direct effects of windblown soil to plants can be effectively mitigated by locating roads and training areas at least 40 m from sensitive plant habitats and through vegetation management to maintain at least 11% aerial cover on disturbed surfaces. Effects of soil type on germination, growth, and survival was species-specific, emphasizing the importance of species trials prior to, or during, rehabilitation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armbrust DV (1984) Wind sandblast injury to field crops: effect of plant age. Agronomy Journal 76:991–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust DV (2001) Plant tolerance to sandblast damage in Ascough JC, Flanagan DC (eds.), Soil erosion research for the 21st Century, proceedings of international symposium. Honolulu, HI, USA

  • Armbrust DV, Paulsen GM (1973) Effect of wind and sandblast injury on nitrate accumulation and on nitrate reductase activity in soybean seedlings. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 4:197–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust DV, Paulsen GM, Ellis R (1974) Physiological responses to wind- and sandblast-damaged winter wheat plants. Agronomy Journal 66:421–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust DV, Retta A (2002) Wind and sandblast damage to growing vegetation. Annals of Arid Zone 39:273–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt J, Kaiser H, Kappen L, Goldbach HE (2002) The possible role of aerosols on stomatal conductivity for water vapour. Basic and Applied Ecology 2:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englert N (2004) Fine particles and human health - a review of epidemiological studies. Toxicology Letters 149:235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fryrear DW (1986) A field dust sampler. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryrear DW (1995) Soil losses by wind erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59:668–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grantz DA, Garner JHB, Johnson DW (2003) Ecological effects of particulate matter. Environment International 29:213–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin LO, Vitousek PM, Matson PA (2003). Nutrient losses over four million years of tropical forest development. Ecology 84:2231–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AH, Andersen SB, Siccama TG (1994) Acid rain and the soils of the Adirondacks. I. Changes in pH and available calcium, 1930–1984. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappos AD, Bruckmann P, Eikmann T, Englert N, Heinrich U, Hoeppe P, Koch E, Krause GHM, Kreyling WG, Rauchfuss K, Rombout P, Schulz-Klemp V, Thiel WR, Wichmann H (2004) Health effects of particles in ambient air. International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health 207:399–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little TM, Hills FJ (1978) Agricultural experimentation, design and analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 350 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ots K, Rauk J (2001) Defoliation of Scots pine and Norway spruce under alkaline dust impact and its relationship with radial increment. Oil and Shale 18:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusty BAK, Mishra PC, Azeez PA (2005) Dust accumulation and leaf pigment content in vegetation near the national highway at Sambalpur, Orissa, India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 60:228–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton K, Chandler D, Stetler L, Lamb B, Claiborn C, Lee BH (2000) Wind erosion and fugitive dust fluxes on agricultural lands in the Pacific Northwest. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 43:623–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore J, Tatarko J (1990) Stochastic wind simulation for erosion modeling. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 33:1893–1899

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi MR, Gibson AC, Rundel PW (1997) Surface dust impacts on gas exchange in Mojave Desert shrubs. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:837–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi MR, Gibson AC, Rundel PW (1999) Phenological and physiological responses of heavily dusted creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) to summer irrigation in the Mojave Desert. Flora 194:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RB, Bern CM, Schulz KA, Diersing VE, Tazik DJ (1990) U.S. Army land condition/trend analysis of the Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii. Tropical Hydrology and Caribbean Water Resources, American Water Resources Association, July 1990 issue

  • Shaw RB, Castillo MJ (1997) Plant communities of Pohakuloa Training Area. Center for Ecological Management of Military Lands, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th Edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang QR, Cui YS, Liu XM, Dong YT, Christie P (2003) Soil contamination and plant uptake of heavy metals at polluted sites in China. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 38:823–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff NP, Siddoway FH (1965) A wind erosion equation. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 29:602–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaady E (2005) Seasonal change and nitrogen cycling in a patchy Negev Desert: a review. Arid Land Research and Management 19:111–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zobeck TM, Parker NC, Haskell S, Guoding K (2000) Scaling up from field to region for wind erosion prediction using a field-scale wind erosion model and GIS. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the U.S. Army, Garrison Hawaii. We would like to thank the PTA Commander, LTC Fred Clarke, as well as U.S. Army Environmental personnel Joel Godfrey and Alvin Char for their support of the study. We also thank Kathy Kawakami and Sydney Cardea for providing their technical expertise in the glasshouse. We are also grateful for the participation of the USF&WS, Honolulu Office for their kind patience and collaboration on the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean M. Gleason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gleason, S.M., Faucette, D.T., Toyofuku, M.M. et al. Assessing and Mitigating the Effects of Windblown Soil on Rare and Common Vegetation. Environmental Management 40, 1016–1024 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9004-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9004-3

Keywords

Navigation