Abstract
The way we learn about our environments—be they farms, forests, or tribal lands—has implications for the formulation of environmental policy. This article presents the findings of how residents learned about their environments in two rural case studies conducted in northern Queensland and relates these to the concept of “primal landscapes,” which is concerned with the interaction that occurs between children and the environments in which they mature. Rather than focusing specifically on built environments or natural environments, the article draws on an approach that conceptualizes environment as meaning-laden places in which we live and work, which integrate social, cultural, biological, physical, and economic dimensions. In drawing insights for environmental policy, the article draws attention to the timing of policy interventions, the significance of experiential environmental education, the potential to learn from place-based festivals, and the importance of learning from extreme events such as fires and floods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Baskaya A., C. Wilson, Y. Ozcan. 2004. Wayfinding in an unfamiliar environment: different spatial settings of two polyclinics. Environment and Behavior 36(6):839–867
Berkes F., J. Colding, C. Folke. 2003. Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bixler R. D., M. F. Floyd, W. E. Hammitt. 2002. Environmental socialization: Quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environment and Behavior 34(6):795–818
Cantrill J. G., S. L. Senecah. 2001. Using the “sense of self-in-place” construct in the context of environmental policy-making and landscape planning. Environmental Science and Policy 4(4–5):185–203
CERES (Centre for Education and Research in Environmental Strategies). 2005. Homepage. Available at http://www.ceres.org.au/ (accessed 26 April 2005)
Charmanz, K. 2000. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. Pages 509–535 in N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Cheng A., L. E. Kruger, S. E. Daniels. 2003. "Place" as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources 16(3):87–104
Davidson-Hunt I. J., F. Berkes. 2003. Nature and society through the lens of resilience: toward a human-in-ecosystem perspective. in F. Berkes, J. Colding, C. Folke (eds.). Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pages 53–82
Derr V. 2002. Children’s sense of place in northern New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22(1–2):125–137
Finger M., P. Verlaan. 1995. Learning our way out: a conceptual framework for social–environmental learning. World Development 2(3):503–513
Gayton D. 1996. Landscapes of the interior: Re-explorations of nature and the human spirit. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada
Gursoy D., K. Kim, M. Uysal. 2004. Perceived impacts of festivals and special events by organizers: An extension and validation. Tourism Management 2(2):171–181
Holling C. S., F. Berkes, C. Folke. 1998. Science, sustainability and resource management. in F. Berkes, C. Folke (eds.). Linking social and ecological Systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pages 342–362
Johnston W. R. 2000. An environmental education for a local community: knowing the Border Ranges. in S. Dovers (ed.). Environmental history and policy: Still settling Australia. Oxford University Press, Melbourne. Pages 147–164
Keen M., V. Brown, R. Dyball. 2005. Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. James and James, Earthscan, London
Kruger, L. E. 1996. Understanding place as a cultural system: Implications of theory and method. Unpublished dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle
Kruger L. E., M. A. Shannon. 2000. Getting to know ourselves and our places through participation in civic social assessment. Society and Natural Resources 13(5):461–478
Layder D. 1998. Sociological practice: linking theory and social research. Sage, London
Malinowski J., C. A. Thurber. 1996. Developmental shifts in the place preferences of boys aged 8–16 years. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16(1):45–54
Mathews S. 2003. How did the fire know we lived here? Canberra’s bushfires January 2003. Ginninderra Press, Canberra
Measham T., R. Baker. 2005. Combining people, place and learning. in M. Keen, V. Brown, R. Dyball (eds.). Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. James and James, Earthscan, London. Pages 91–103
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd ed. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Piaget, J. 2001. The psychology of intelligence. Routledge, London
Stedman R. 2002. Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behaviour from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior 34(5):561–581
Thrift N. 1999. Steps to an ecology of place. in D. Massey, J. Allen, P. Sarre (eds.). Human geography today. Polity Press, Cambridge. Pages 295–322
Vanclay F., R. Lane, J. Willis, I. Coates, D. Lucas. 2004. "Committing to place" and evaluating the higher purpose: Increasing engagement in natural resource management through museum outreach and educational activities. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 6(4):539–564
Williams D. R., M. E. Patterson. 1996. Environmental meaning and ecosystem management: Perspectives from environmental psychology and human geography. Society and Natural Resources 9(5):507–521
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Measham, T.G. Learning about Environments: The Significance of Primal Landscapes. Environmental Management 38, 426–434 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0205-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0205-3