Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Regional Classification Scheme for Estimating Reference Water Quality in Streams Using Land-Use-Adjusted Spatial Regression-Tree Analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various approaches are used to subdivide large areas into regions containing streams that have similar reference or background water quality and that respond similarly to different factors. For many applications, such as establishing reference conditions, it is preferable to use physical characteristics that are not affected by human activities to delineate these regions. However, most approaches, such as ecoregion classifications, rely on land use to delineate regions or have difficulties compensating for the effects of land use. Land use not only directly affects water quality, but it is often correlated with the factors used to define the regions. In this article, we describe modifications to SPARTA (spatial regression-tree analysis), a relatively new approach applied to water-quality and environmental characteristic data to delineate zones with similar factors affecting water quality. In this modified approach, land-use-adjusted (residualized) water quality and environmental characteristics are computed for each site. Regression-tree analysis is applied to the residualized data to determine the most statistically important environmental characteristics describing the distribution of a specific water-quality constituent. Geographic information for small basins throughout the study area is then used to subdivide the area into relatively homogeneous environmental water-quality zones. For each zone, commonly used approaches are subsequently used to define its reference water quality and how its water quality responds to changes in land use. SPARTA is used to delineate zones of similar reference concentrations of total phosphorus and suspended sediment throughout the upper Midwestern part of the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexander R. B., J. W. Brakebill, R. E. Brew, and R. A. Smith. 1999. ERF1— enhanced river reach river 1.2. United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 99–457

  • Arnold J. G., Williams J. R., Srinivasan R., King K. W. 1996. SWAT: Soil and water assessment tool. Model documentation. United States Department Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX

  • Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 1984. Classification and regression trees: Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA 358 pp

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classifications for wetlands. United states Army Corps Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Teclinical Report WRP-DE-4

  • Dodds W. K., Oakes R. M. 2004, A technique of establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds affected by humans Limnology and Oceanography Methods 2:333–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth R. K., E. S. Thompson, and E. L. Peck. 1982, Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report NWS 33, Map 3, annual free water surface evaporation (shallow lake) 1956–70

  • Fullerton, D. S., C. A. Bush, and J. N. Penne. 2003. Map of surficial deposits and materials in the eastern and central United States (east of 102 degrees West Longitude). United Geological Survey Geological Investigations Series I-2789

  • Gebert, W. A., D. J. Graczyk, and W. R. Krug. 1987. Average annual runoff in the United States, 1951–80. U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigation Atlas HA-170, 1 sheet, scale 1:2,000,000

  • Larson S. J., Gilliom R. J. 2001. Regression models for estimating herbicide concentrations in U.S. streams from watershed characteristics Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1349–1367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Climatic Data Center. 2002. U.S. Monthly Climate Normals 1971–2002. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

  • Nolan, J. V., J. W. Brakebill, R. B. Alexander, and G. E. Schwarz. 2002. Enhanced River Reach File, Version 2.0. United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 02–40

  • Omernik J. M. 1995, Ecoregions—a spatial framework for environmental management. In W. S. Davis T. P. Simon, (eds.) Biological assessment and criteria—tools for water resource planning and decision making, Lewis Boca Raton, FL Pages 49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D. M, Saad D. A. 2003. Environmental water-quality zones for streams: a regional classification scheme Environmental Management 31:581–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. E., and R. B. Alexander. 1995, State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data base for the conterminous United States. United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 95–449

  • Seaber, P. R., and E. F. Kapinos, and G. L. Knapp. 1984, State hydrologic unit maps. United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 84–708, 198 pp

  • Smith R. A., Schwarz G. E., Alexander R. B. 1997. Regional interpretation of water-quality data Water Resources Research 33:2781–2798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R. A., Alexander R. B., Schwarz G. E. 2003. Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United States Environmental Science and Technology 37:2039–3047

    Google Scholar 

  • Seller, D. R., and P. H. Packard. 1998, Digital representation of a map showing the thickness and character of quaternary sediments in the glaciated United States east of the Rocky Mountains. United States Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-38

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. National strategy for the development of regional nutrient criteria. Office of Water, ERP-822-R-98–002

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000a. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual: lakes and reservoirs. Office of Water, EPA-822-B-00–001

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000b. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual: rivers and streams. Office of Water, EPA-822-B-00–0017, EPA-822-B-0018, EPA-822-B-0019, EPA-822-B-0020

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual: rivers and streams. Office of Water, EPA-822-B-01-0015

  • United States Geological Survey. 1999a. National Elevation Dataset. United States Geological Survey Factsheet 148–99

  • United States Geological Survey. 1999b. National Hydrography Dataset. United States Geological Survey Factsheet 106–99

  • United States Geological Survey. 2000. National Land Cover Dataset. United States Geological Survey Factsheet 108–00

  • Weisberg S. 1980. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Rebecca Woll for assistance with data compilation and GIS support; Jennifer Bruce for assistance with illustrations; and David Wolock and Walter Dodds for their critical comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. This work was funded by USEPA Contract No. DW14948046010 and the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale M. Robertson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, D.M., Saad, D.A. & Heisey, D.M. A Regional Classification Scheme for Estimating Reference Water Quality in Streams Using Land-Use-Adjusted Spatial Regression-Tree Analysis. Environmental Management 37, 209–229 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0022-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0022-8

Keywords

Navigation