Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a Scientifically Rigorous Basis for Developing Mapped Ecological Regions

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the wide use of ecological regions in conservation and resource-management evaluations and assessments, a commonly accepted theoretical basis for ecological regionalization does not exist. This fact, along with the paucity of focus on ecological regionalization by professional associations, journals, and faculties, has inhibited the advancement of a broadly acceptable scientific basis for the development, use, and verification of ecological regions. The central contention of this article is that ecological regions should improve our understanding of geographic and ecological phenomena associated with biotic and abiotic processes occurring in individual regions and also of processes characteristic of interactions and dependencies among multiple regions. Research associated with any ecoregional framework should facilitate development of hypotheses about ecological phenomena and dominant landscape elements associated with these phenomena, how these phenomena are structured in space, and how they function in a hierarchy. Success in addressing the research recommendations outlined in this article cannot occur within an ad hoc, largely uncoordinated research environment. Successful implementation of this plan will require activities—coordination, funding, and education—that are both scientific and administrative in nature. Perhaps the most important element of an infrastructure to support the scientific work of ecoregionalization would be a national or international authority similar to the Water and Science Technology Board of the National Academy of Sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. R. G. Bailey (1987) ArticleTitleSuggested hierarchy of criteria for multiscale ecosystem mapping Landscape and Urban Planning 14 313–319 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0169-2046(87)90042-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. G. Bailey (1996) Ecosystem geography Springer New York 204

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, R. G. 2004. Boundaries on ecoregion maps. Environmental Management (this issue).

  4. R. G. Bailey S. C. Zoltai E. B. Wiken (1985) ArticleTitleEcological regionalization in Canada and United States Geoforum 16 465–275 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0016-7185(85)90034-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Barham (2001) ArticleTitleEco-boundaries as community boundaries: The politics of watersheds Society and Natural Resources 14 181–191 Occurrence Handle10.1080/089419201750110976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. A. Boughton E. R. Smith R. V. O’Neill (1999) ArticleTitleRegional vulnerability: A conceptual framework Ecosystem Health 5 312–322 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09949.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Bryce J. M. Omernik D. P. Larsen (1999) ArticleTitleEcoregions: A geographic framework to guide risk characterization and ecosystem management Environmental Practice 1 141–155 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1466046600000582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canadian Forest Service (CFS). 2000. The state of Canada’s forest—1999–2000. Natural Resources Canada. Ottawa, Ontario.

  9. A. Cheng L. E. Kruger S. E. Daniels (2003) ArticleTitle“Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda Society and Natural Resources 16 87–104 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08941920309199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Drummond T. Marsden (1999) The condition of sustainability Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. T. T. Forman M. Godron (1986) Landscape ecology John Wiley and Sons NewYork 619

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. L. Graf (2001) ArticleTitleDamage control: Restoring the physical integrity of America’s rivers Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 1–27 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0004-5608.00231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gryseels, G., and A. Kassam. 1994. Characterization and implementation of the CGIAR ecoregional concept in Proceedings of International Food Policy Research Institute Ecoregional/2020 Vision Workshop, November 1994. Airlie Conference Center, Virginia.

  14. Hargrove, W. W., and F. M. Hoffman. 2004. Extending the ecoregion concept beyond the limits of human experience using quantitative methods. Environmental Management (this issue).

  15. Hargrove, W. W., and R. J. Luxmore. 1998. A new high-resolution national map of vegetation ecoregions produced empirically using multivariate spatial clustering. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. http://www.esd.ornlgov/~hnw/esri98 (August, 30, 2002).

  16. J. F. Hart (1982) ArticleTitleThe highest form of the geographer’s art Annals of the Association of American Geographers 72 1–29 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01380.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. A. Heiskary C. B. Wilson (1989) ArticleTitleThe regional nature of lake water quality across Minnesota: An analysis for improving resource management Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Sciences 55 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. D. Hudson (1992) ArticleTitleThe soil survey as paradigm-based science Soil Science Society of America 56 836–841 Occurrence Handle10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030027x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. M. Hughes (1995) Defining biological status by comparing with reference conditions W. S. Davis T. P. Simon (Eds) Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision-making Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keys, J. E., Jr., C. A. Carpenter, S. L. Hooks, F. G. Koeneg, W. H. McNab, W. E. Russell, and M. L. Smith. 1995. Ecological units of the eastern United States—first approximation. Technical Publication R8-TP 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Map scale 1:3,500,000.

  21. D. P. Larsen K. W. Thorton N. S. Urquart S. G. Paulsen (1994) ArticleTitleThe role of sample surveys for monitoring the conditions of the Nation’s lakes Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 32 101–134 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00547131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. A. Levin (1992) ArticleTitleThe problem of pattern and scale in ecology Ecology 73 1943–1967 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1941447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Loveland, T. R., and G. McMahon. 2004. Overview of the Sioux Falls ecoregionalizationsymposium, September 2001. Environmental Management (this issue).

  24. McGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 122 pp.

  25. G. McMahon T. F. Cuffney (2000) ArticleTitleQuantifying urban intensity in drainage basins for assessing stream ecological conditions Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36 1247–1262

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. McMahon S. Gregonis S. Waltman J. M. Omernik T. Thorson J. Freeouf A. Rorick J. Keyes (2001) ArticleTitleDeveloping a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous United States Environmental Management 28 293–316 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvovVemtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s0026702429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. InstitutionalAuthorNameNorth American Ecosystem Working Group (NAEWG) (1997) Ecological regions of North America: Towards a common perspective Commission for Environmental Cooperation Montreal, Quebec 71

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. R. Olsen H. T. Schreuder (1997) ArticleTitlePerspectives on large-scale natural resource surveys when cause-effect is a potential issue Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4 167–180 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018522428238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. M Olson E. Dinerstein E. D. Wikramanayake N. O. Burgess G. V. N. Powell E. C. Underwood J. A. D’amico I. Itoua H. E. Strand J. C. Morrison C. J. Loucks T. F. Allnutt T. H. Ricketts Y. Kura J. F. Lamoureux W. W. Wettengel P. Hedao K. R. Kassem (2001) ArticleTitleTerrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth BioScience 51 933–938

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. M. Omernik (1987) ArticleTitleEcoregions of the conterminous United States Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 118–125 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. M. Omernik (1995) Ecoregions: A spatial framework for environmental management W. S. Davis T. P. Simon (Eds) Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision-making Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  32. Omernik, J. M. 2004. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environmental Management (this issue).

  33. R. V. O’Neill (2001) ArticleTitleIs it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors, of course!) Ecology 82 3275–3284 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2680151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. S. Rowe J. W. Sheard (1981) ArticleTitleEcological land classification: A survey approach Environmental Management 5 451–464 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01866822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R. R. Sokal (1974) ArticleTitleClassification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects Science 185 1115–1123 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvls12rug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. D.L. Strayer M.E. Power W.F. Fagan S.T. Pickett J. Belnap (2003) ArticleTitleA Classification of ecological boundaries BioScience 53(8) 723–729

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. J. Taylor R. Garcia-Barrios (1995) ArticleTitleThe social analysis of ecological change: From systems to intersecting processes Social Science Information 34 5–30

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. D. Turner P. J. Taylor (2003) ArticleTitleCritical reflections on the use of remote sensing and GIS technologies in human ecological research Human Ecology 31 177–182 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023958712140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J. A. Wiens C.S. Crawford J.R. Gosz (1985) ArticleTitleBoundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems Oikos 45 421–427

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. A. Wiens (1989) ArticleTitleSpatial scaling in ecology Functional Ecology 3 385–397 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2389612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. T. R. Whittier R. M. Hughes D. P. Larsen (1988) ArticleTitleThe correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45 1264–1278

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wiken, E. B. 1995. Environmental/ecological monitoring: Strategies for transition (some experience and examples from a Canadian review). Pages 121–131 in Proceedings of the Moscow seminar on the development of the unified state environmental monitoring system in the Russian Federation. Pub GA/205024-95/6. GRID Arendal, Norway.

  43. Wiken, E. B. 1996a. Ecosystems: Frameworks for thought. in Proceedings of World Conservation 1/96. IUCN. Rue, Mauverney 28, Gland, Switzerland.

  44. Wiken, E. B. 1996b. Introduction to Canada’s ecozones. State of the Environment Report of the Conserving Canada’s Natural Legacy. CD ROM. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OE7.

  45. Wiken, E. B. 1997. State of the environment reporting in Canada and North America: An overview of the concepts and applications. Pages C13–C18 in Proceedings of the first national workshop on the state of the environment reporting workshop. SOER Occasional Paper No. 1. ISBN: 0-7974-1744-3. Government of the Republic Zimbabwe. Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Harare, Zimbabwe.

  46. Wiken, E. B., and D. Gauthier. 1997. Conservation and ecology in North America. inProceedings of the caring for home place: Protected areas and landscape ecology. ISBN 0-88880-362-1. University Extension Press and the Canadian Plains Research Centre, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.

  47. Wiken, E. B., D. Gauthier, I. Marshall, K. Lawton, and H. Hirvonen. 1996. A perspective on Canada’s ecosystems: An overview of the terrestrial and marine ecozones. Occasional paper no. 14. Canadian Council on Ecological Areas (CCEA), Ottawa, Ontario, 69 pp.

  48. Wildlife Habitat Canada (WHC). 2001. The status of wildlife habitats in Canada 2001. Wildlife Habitat Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 98 pp.

  49. Wolock, D. M., T. C. Winter, and G. McMahon. 2004. Definition and evaluation of hydrologic landscape regions in the United States using geographic information system tools and multivariate analysis. Environmental Management (this issue).

  50. Zhou, Y. 1996. An ecological regionalization model based on NOAA/AVHRR data. Pages 1001–1006 in International archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing (ISPRS), Vol. XXXI, Part B4, Vienna, Austria.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, 3916, Sunset Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA

    Gerard McMahon

  2. National Habitat Science and Policy Program, Wildlife Habitat Canada, 7 Hinton Avenue North Suite 200, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1Y 4P1

    Ed B. Wiken

  3. Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2

    David A. Gauthier

Authors
  1. Gerard McMahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ed B. Wiken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David A. Gauthier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMahon, G., Wiken, E. & Gauthier, D. Toward a Scientifically Rigorous Basis for Developing Mapped Ecological Regions. Environmental Management 34 (Suppl 1), S111–S124 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0170-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0170-2

Search

Navigation