Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Projecting Large-Scale Area Changes in Land Use and Land Cover for Terrestrial Carbon Analyses

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the largest changes in US forest type areas over the last half-century has involved pine types in the South. The area of planted pine has increased more than 10-fold since 1950, mostly on private lands. Private landowners have responded to market incentives and government programs, including subsidized afforestation on marginal agricultural land. Timber harvest is a crucial disturbance affecting planted pine area, as other forest types are converted to planted pine after harvest. Conversely, however, many harvested pine plantations revert to other forest types, mainly due to passive regeneration behavior on nonindustrial private timberlands. We model land use and land cover changes as a basis for projecting future changes in planted pine area, to aid policy analysts concerned with mitigation activities for global climate change. Projections are prepared in two stages. Projected land use changes include deforestation due to pressures to develop rural land as the human population expands, which is a larger area than that converted from other rural lands (e.g., agriculture) to forestry. In the second stage, transitions among forest types are projected on land allocated to forestry. We consider reforestation, influences of timber harvest, and natural succession and disturbance processes. Baseline projections indicate a net increase of about 5.6 million ha in planted pine area in the South over the next 50 years, with a notable increase in sequestered carbon. Additional opportunities to expand pine plantation area warrant study of landowner behavior to aid in designing more effective incentives for inducing land use and land cover changes to help mitigate climate change and attain other goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, D., and R. Haynes 1996. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure projections, and policy simulations. General Technical Report, GTR-PNW-504. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon. 58 pp.

  2. Adams, D. R., Alig, B., McCarl, J., Callaway, S. Winnett. 1996. The forest and agricultural sector optimization model: model structure and applications. Research Paper PNW-RP-495. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 44 pp.

  3. D. M. Adams (2002) ArticleTitleHarvest, inventory, and stumpage prices: Consumption outpaces harvest, prices rise slowly Journal of Forestry 100 IssueID2 26–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. M. Adams R. Alig B. McCarl J. Callaway S. Winnett (1999) ArticleTitleMinimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests Land Economics 75 IssueID3 360–374

    Google Scholar 

  5. AF&PA (American Forest and Paper Association). 1999. Survey of member firms about timber management and forest management. Washington, DC.

  6. S. Ahn A. Plantinga A. Alig (2002) ArticleTitleDeterminants and projections of land use in the South Central United States Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 26 78–84

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Alig T. Mills R. Shakelford (1980) ArticleTitleMost Soil Bank plantings in the South have been retained; Some need follow-up treatments. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 4 60–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Alig (1986) ArticleTitleEconometric analysis of forest acreage trends in the Southeast Forest Science 32 IssueID1 119–134

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Alig J. Wyant (1985) ArticleTitleProjecting regional area changes in forestland cover in the U.S.A. Ecological Modelling 29 27–34 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3800(85)90045-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl J. Callaway S. Winnett (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing effects of carbon mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors. Environmental and Resource Economics 9 259–274 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026409105660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl (1998) ArticleTitleImpacts of incorporating land exchanges between forestry and agriculture in sector models. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30 IssueID2 389–401

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Alig D. Adams J. Chmelik P. Bettinger (1999) ArticleTitlePrivate forest investment and long-run sustainable harvest volumes New Forests 17 307–327 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006559320038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl P. Ince (2000) ArticleTitleEconomic potential of short-rotation woody crops on agricultural land for pulp fiber production in the United States Forest Products Journal 50 IssueID5 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Alig J. Mills B. Butler (2002a) ArticleTitlePrivate timberlands: growing demands, shrinking land base Journal of Forestry 100 IssueID2 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl (2002b) ArticleTitleProjecting impacts of global climate change on the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors and carbon budgets Forest Ecology and Management 169 3–14 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00290-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alig, R., Plantinga, A., Ahn, S., Kline, J. 2003. Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-587. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 92 pp

  17. R. Birdsey R. Alig D. Adams (2000) Mitigation options in the forest sector to reduce emissions or enhance sinks of greenhouse gases. Chapter 8 L. A. Joyce R. Birdsey (Eds) The impact of climate change on America’s forests. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-59 US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Ft. Collins, Colorado 112–131

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Cai E. Kalnay (2003) ArticleTitleImpact of urbanization and land-use change on climate Nature 423 528–531 Occurrence Handle10.1038/nature01675 Occurrence Handle12774119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Hair R. Sampson T. Hamilton (1996) ArticleTitleSummary: forest management opportunities for increasing carbon storage Forests and Global Change 2 237–254

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Irland D. Adams R. and others Alig (2001) ArticleTitleAssessing socioeconomic impacts of climate change on U.S. forests, wood-product markets, and forest recreation BioScience 51 IssueID9 753–764

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Kline B. Butler R. Alig (2002) ArticleTitleTree planting in the South: landowner behavior Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 26 IssueID2 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Lee H. Kaiser R. Alig (1992) ArticleTitleSubstitution of public for private funding in planting southern pine Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 16(4) 204–208

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Matthews R. O’Connor A. Plantinga (2002) ArticleTitleQuantifying the impacts on biodiversity of policies for carbon sequestration in forests Ecological Economics 40 71–87 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00269-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. McCarl D. Adams R. Alig J. Chmelik (2000) ArticleTitleCompetitiveness of biomass-fueled electrical power plants Annals of Operations Research 94 37–55 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018929402930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moffat, S. O., Cubbage, F. W., Cascio, A .J., Sheffield, R. M. 1998. The future of forest management on NIPF lands in the South: results of an expert opinion survey InProceedings, 1998 annual meeting of the Southern Forest Economics Workers meeting, March 1998, Williamsburg, Virginia.

  26. Moulton, R. 1999. Tree planting in the United States, 1998. Tree Planting Statistics. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.

  27. Moulton, R., and Richards, K. 1990. Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. General Technical Report WO-58. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.

  28. New York Times. 2001. Sprawl seen to hurt South’s forests. Katharine Seelye, Late Edition - Final, Section A, Page 10. 27 November 2001.

  29. A. J. Plantinga R. Alig H. Cheng (2001) ArticleTitleThe supply of land for conservation uses: evidence from the Conservation Reserve Program Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 31 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. A. Sedjo (1989) ArticleTitleForests: a tool to moderate global warming? Environment 31 IssueID1 14–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sheffield, R., and Thompson, M. 1997. Forest statistics for southwest Georgia, 1996. Resource Bulletin SRS-12. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, North Carolina. 68 pp.

  32. K. E. Skog T. Marcin L. Heath (1996) Opportunities to reduce carbon emissions and increase storage by wood substitution, recycling, and improved utilization R.N. Sampson D. Hair (Eds) Forests and global change, vol. 2: forest management opportunities American Forests Washington, D.C. 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smith, W. B., and others. 2001. Forest resources of the United States, 1997. General Technical Report NC-GTR-219.USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota.

  34. B. Sohngen R. Alig (2000) ArticleTitleMitigation, adaptation, and climate change: Results from recent research on US timber markets Environmental Science and Policy 3 235–248 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00094-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Forest Sector Team (2000) ArticleTitleForest sector analysis for national climate change assessment. Washington, DC. Information available at: http://www.nacc.usgcrp.gov/sectors/forests/. . . .

    Google Scholar 

  36. USDA Forest Service. 1988. South’s fourth forest report. Forest Resources Report No. 23. Washington, DC.

  37. USDA Forest Service. 2001. 2000 Resources Planning Act Assessment. Washington, DC.

  38. USDA Forest Service. 2003. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952-2050. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-560. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 254 pp. (two related web sites are: www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/ and fia.fs.fed.us/rpa.htm).

  39. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1999. Trends and future challenges for U.S. national ocean and coastal policy. Proceedings of a workshop, Washington, DC, 22 January 1999. National Ocean Service, NOAA, Washington, DC, 142 pp.

  40. M. Vasievich R. Alig (1996) Opportunities to increase timber growth and carbon storage on timberlands in the contiguous United States. R. N. Sampson D. Hair (Eds) Forests and Global Change, Vol. 2: Forest Management Opportunities. American Forests Washington, DC 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. Wear J. Greis (2002) ArticleTitleSouthern Forest Resource Assessment: Summary of Findings Journal of Forestry 100 IssueID7 6–15

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. C. Zinkhan (1993) ArticleTitleTimberland investment management organizations and other participants in forest asset markets: a survey Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 17 IssueID1 32–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Forest Inventory and Analysis units in helping to interpret forest survey data and helpful review comments by SoEun Ahn, Bill Stanley, Ge Sun, and Marge Victor. Partial funding was provided by the USDA Forest Service’s Resources Planning Act Assessment management unit in Washington, DC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alig, R., Butler, B. Projecting Large-Scale Area Changes in Land Use and Land Cover for Terrestrial Carbon Analyses. Environmental Management 33, 443–456 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9102-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9102-9

Keywords

Navigation