Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communication in Ecosystem Management: A Case Study of Cross-Disciplinary Integration in the Assessment Phase of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective communication is essential to the success of collaborative ecosystem management projects. In this paper, we investigated the dynamics of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project’s (ICBEMP) cross-disciplinary integration process in the assessment phase. Using a case study research design, we captured the rich trail of experience through conducting in-depth interviews and collecting information from internal and public documents, videos, and meetings related to the ICBEMP. Coding and analysis was facilitated by a qualitative analysis software, NVivo. Results include the range of internal perspectives on barriers and facilitators of cross-disciplinary integration in the Science Integration Team (SIT). These are arrayed in terms of discipline-based differences, organizational structures and activities, individual traits of scientists, and previous working relationships. The ICBEMP organization included a team of communication staffs (CT), and the data described the CT as a mixed group in terms of qualifications and educational backgrounds that played a major role in communication with actors external to the ICBEMP organization but a minor one in terms of internal communication. The data indicated that the CT-SIT communication was influenced by characteristics of actors and structures related to organizations and their cultures. We conclude that the ICBEMP members may not have had a sufficient level of shared understanding of central domains, such as the task at hand and ways and timing of information sharing. The paper concludes by suggesting that future ecosystem management assessment teams use qualified communications specialists to design and monitor the development of shared cognition among organization members in order to improve the effectiveness of communication and cross-disciplinary integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Associated Press. 2000. Columbia Basin plan upsets both sides. Lewiston Morning Tribune 7A.

  • A. P. Banks L. J. Millward (2000) ArticleTitleRunning shared mental models as a distributed cognitive process British Journal of Psychology 91 513–531 Occurrence Handle10.1348/000712600161961 Occurrence Handle11104176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A. K. Brooks (1994) ArticleTitlePower and the production of knowledge: Collective team learning in work organizations Human Resource Development Quarterly 5 213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Cannon-Bowers E. Salas (2001a) ArticleTitleReflections on shared cognition Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 195–202 Occurrence Handle10.1002/job.82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Cannon-Bowers E. Salas (2001b) ArticleTitleSpecial issue preface Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 87–88 Occurrence Handle10.1002/job.97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. N. Clark G. H. Stankey P. J. Brown J. A. Burchfield R. W. Haynes S. F. McCool (1999) Toward an ecological approach: Integrating social, economic, cultural, biological and physical considerations N. C. Johnson A. J. Malk W. T. Sexton R. Szaro (Eds) Ecological stewardship: a common reference for ecosystem management Elsevier Science Ltd Oxford 297–318

    Google Scholar 

  • T. W. Clark (1999) ArticleTitleInterdisciplinary problem solving: Next steps in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Policy Sciences 32 393–414 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004717427462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Conley M. A. Moote (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluating collaborative natural resource management Society and Natural Resources 16 371–386 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08941920309181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. D. N. Cook D. Yanow (1993) ArticleTitleCultures and organizational learning Journal of Management Inquiry 2 373–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortner, H. J., M. A. Shannon, M. G. Wallace, S. Burke, and M. A. Moote. 1996. Institutional barriers and incentives for ecosystem management: A problem analysis. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-GTR-354, 35 pp.

  • R. L. Daft (2001) Organization theory and design. 7 ed South-Western College Publishing Cincinnati, Ohio 633 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Erlandson E. L. Harris B. L. Skipper S. D. Allen (1993) Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods Sage Publications, Inc London 198 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMAT goes to court. 1994. Journal of Forestry 92:18

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fraser (1999) QSR NUD*IST Vivo: Reference guide Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd Melbourne, Australia 206 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Grumbine (1994) ArticleTitleWhat is ecosystem management Conservation Biology 8 27–38 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, K. M. 1997. Measures of success in public involvement processes: An investigation of how managers, researchers and members of the public define success. Master’s thesis, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana.

  • Haynes, R. W., R. T. Graham, and T. M. Quigley. 1996. A framework for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, PNW-GTR-374, Portland, Oregon, 68 pp.

  • R. W. Haynes T. M. Quigley (2001) ArticleTitleBroad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia basin example Forest Ecology and Management 153 179–188 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00460-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. L. Henwood N. F. Pidgeon (1992) ArticleTitleQualitative research and psychological theorizing British Journal of Psychology 83 97–111 Occurrence Handle1559146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. 1996. Status of the Interior Columbia Basin. Summary of scientific findings. USDA, Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-GTR-385, Portland, Oregon, 144 pp.

  • E. Kasl V. J. Marsick K. Dechant (1997) ArticleTitleTeams as learners: A research-based model of learning Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 33 227–246

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Klimoski S. Mohammed (1994) ArticleTitleTeam mental model: Construct or metaphor Journal of Management 20 403–437 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Kuzel (1992) Sampling in qualitative inquiry B. F. Crabtree W. L. Miller (Eds) Doing qualitative research Sage Publications London 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kvale (1996) InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA 326 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. R. Lachapelle S. F. McCool M. E. Patterson (2003) ArticleTitleBarriers to effective natural resource planning in a “messy” world Society and Natural Resources 16 473–490 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08941920309151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. S. Lincoln E. G. Guba (2000) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences N. K. Denzin Y. S. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research Sage Publications London 163–188

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Madill A. Jordan C. Shirley (2000) ArticleTitleObjectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies British Journal of Psychology 91 1–20 Occurrence Handle10.1348/000712600161646 Occurrence Handle10717768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, E. L., E. E. Krumpe, and P. D. Cowles. 1994. The principles and processes of public involvement: A state-of-the-art synthesis for agencies venturing into ecosystem management. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW #94-0517, Portland, Oregon, pp. 55

  • N. E. McIntyre K. Knowles-Yanez D. Hope (2000) ArticleTitleUrban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: Differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences Urban Ecosystems 4 5–24 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009540018553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Meppem R. Gill (1998) ArticleTitlePlanning for sustainability as a learning concept Ecological Economics 26 121–137 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00117-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. B. Miles A. M. Huberman (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed Sage Publications London 338 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mohammed R. Klimoski J. R. Rentsch (2000) ArticleTitleThe measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema Organizational Research Methods 3 123–165

    Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Moss (2000) ArticleTitleInterdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the “Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes” Landscape Ecology 15 303–311 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008144402408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Norgaard (1992) ArticleTitleCoordinating disciplinary and organizational ways of knowing Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 42 205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Q. Patton (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed Sage Publications Newbury Park, California 532 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Pontecorvo (1993) ArticleTitleForms of discourse and shared thinking Cognition and Instruction 11 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Quigley R. W. Haynes R. T. Graham (1996) Integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-GTR-382 Portland, Oregon 303 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Quigley R. W. Haynes W. J. Hann (2001) ArticleTitleEstimating ecological integrity in the interior Columbia River Basin Forest Ecology and Management 153 161–178 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00459-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., and J. Nuburka. 1997. Public participation in forest planning—8 attributes of success. Journal of Forestry 17–19.

  • Siddoway, S. E. 1995. The recreation site planning process in five different organizations: A comparative multiple case study. Master’s thesis, Department of Resource Recreation and Tourism, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.

  • R. N. Steabler (1994) ArticleTitleFEMAT: An intense experience for all Journal of Forestry 92 5

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Strauss J. Corbin (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques Sage Publications London 270 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service. 1993. Strengthening public involvement: A national model for building long-term relationships with the public. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. pp. 22

  • Wallace, M. G., H. J. Cortner, S. Burke, and M. A. Moote. 1994. Moving towards ecosystem management: Examining a change in philosophy for resource management. Water Resources Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

  • Whiteman, M. R. 1993. An assessment of management strategies for public natural resource conflict. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.

  • A. Wijkman (1999) ArticleTitleSustainable development requires integrated approaches Policy Sciences 32 345–350 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004722400687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 1994. Building bridges across agency boundaries: In search of excellence in the United States Forest Service. USDA-Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW 92-0215, Seattle, 93 pp.

  • J. M. Wondolleck S. L. Yaffee (2000) Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management Island Press Washington, D. C. 277 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Yin (1994) Case study research: Design and methods. 2nd ed. Vol. 5, Applied Social Research Methods Series Sage Publications London 171 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The completion of this study was dependent on the repeated, generous sharing of time and insights by ICBEMP personnel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Idaho, College of Natural Resources, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA

    Christine Haugaard Jakobsen

  2. Department of Resource Recreation and Tourism, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA

    William J. McLaughlin

Authors
  1. Christine Haugaard Jakobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William J. McLaughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Haugaard Jakobsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakobsen, C., McLaughlin, W. Communication in Ecosystem Management: A Case Study of Cross-Disciplinary Integration in the Assessment Phase of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Environmental Management 33, 591–605 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2900-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2900-2

Search

Navigation