Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determining Visitors’ Dispositions Toward the Designation of a Greek National Park

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

This article presents the findings of the first major visitor survey conducted at the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex, situated in northern Greece. The study area is one of a number of sites planned to become National Parks under a recent initiative of the Greek government. We used a logistic regression method to define significant predictors of visitors’ awareness and attitude toward park designation, as well as their willingness to pay a conditional entrance fee. Study findings demonstrated that the probability of being aware of the park designation initiative is higher for visitors who obtained information from travel agencies or media to make their destination choice, compared to visitors who resorted to word-of-mouth recommendations. Knowledge and attitudes toward animals living in the study area revealed a limited influence on visitors’ dispositions toward park designation. The results of this study call for action to implement education programs for National Park users. These programs should aim at rendering the environmental characteristics of the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex to be significant predictors of visitors’ dispositions toward the study area. This would favor its uniqueness as a destination, as well as contribute to its long-term economic sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameARCTUROS (1999) Conservation of brown bear (Ursus arctos): Populations and habitats of brown bear in Greece. Volume A. Project ARCTOS 2nd phase Thessaloniki Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Baloglu K. W. McCleary (1999) ArticleTitleA model of destination image formation Annals of Tourism Research 26 868–897 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. J. Bateman I. H. Langford (1997) ArticleTitleNon-users’ willingness to pay for a National Park: An application and critique of the contingent valuation method Regional Studies 31 571–582 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00343409750131703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Björk (2000) ArticleTitleEcotourism from a conceptual perspective, an extended definition of a unique tourism form International Journal of Tourism Research 2 189–202 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1522-1970(200005/06)2:3<189::AID-JTR195>3.0.CO;2-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Briassoulis (1992) Environmental impacts of tourism: a framework for analysis and evaluation H. Briassoulis J. Straaten Particlevan der (Eds) Tourism and the environment: Regional, economic, and policy issues Kluwer Academic Press Dordrecht 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • M. W. Brunson D. K. Reiter (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest Journal of Environmental Management 46 31–41 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1996.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Crick-Furman R. Prentice (2000) ArticleTitleModeling tourists’ multiple values Annals of Tourism Research 27 69–92 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00041-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafis, S., E. Papastergiadou, K. Georgiou, T. Georgiadis, M. Papageorgiou, and T. Lazaridou. 1996. The Greek ‘Habitat’ Project (Directive 92/43/EEC) Natura 2000: An overview. Final Project Report. Life Contract B4-3200/94/756. Commission of the European Communities DG XI. The Goulandris Natural History Museum

  • G. S. Dharmaratne F. Y. Sang L. J. Walling (2000) ArticleTitleTourism potentials for financing protected areas Annals of Tourism Research 27 590–610 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00109-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Dougherty D. C. Fulton D. H. Anderson (2003) ArticleTitleThe influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park Society and Natural Resources 16 603–623 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08941920309187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Gerakis K. Kalburtji (1998) ArticleTitleAgricultural activities affecting the functions and values of Ramsar wetland sites of Greece Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 70 119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gnoth (1997) ArticleTitleTourism motivation and expectation formation Annals of Tourism Research 24 283–304 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(97)80002-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Goossens (2000) ArticleTitleTourism information and pleasure motivation Annals of Tourism Research 27 301–321 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00067-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameGreek National Tourism Organization–WWF Hellas (2000) Designing pilot projects for ecotourism development Hellenic Republic, Ministry of Development Athens 208 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • D. N. Gujarati (1988) Basic econometrics McGraw-Hill Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hearne Z. M. Salinas (2002) ArticleTitleThe use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica Journal of Environmental Management 65 153–163 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.2001.0541 Occurrence Handle12197077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • J. Heckman (1979) ArticleTitleSample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica 47 153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Heer H.-P. Rusterholz B. Baur (2003) ArticleTitleForest perception and knowledge of hikers and mountain bikers in two different areas in Northwestern Switzerland Environmental Management 31 709–723 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00267-003-3002-x Occurrence Handle14565692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hovardas, T. 1999. The Dadia Forest Reserve: The protected area, the local community, and ecotourism development. Master’s Thesis. Aristotle University, School of Biology, Thessaloniki, 210 pp

  • B. P. Kaltenborn D. R. Williams (2002) ArticleTitleThe meaning of place: attachments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and locals Norwegian Journal of Geography 56 189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • J Kerkvliet C. Nowell (2000) ArticleTitleTools for recreation management in parks: The case of the greater Yellowstone’s blue-ribbon fishery Ecological Economics 34 89–100 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00139-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Kotchen S. D. Reiling (2000) ArticleTitleEnvironmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species Ecological Economics 32 93–107 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00069-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Koutrakis T. Lazaridou M. D. Argyropoulou (2003) ArticleTitlePromoting integrated management in the Strymonikos coastal zone (Greece): A step-by-step process Coastal Management 31 195–200 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08920750390168417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.-K. Lee S.-Y. Han (2002) ArticleTitleEstimating the use and preservation values of National Parks’ tourism resources using a contingent valuation method Tourism Management 23 531–540 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Lindberg (1991) Policies for maximizing nature tourism’s ecological and economic benefits World Resources Institute New York, 37 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • I Machairas (2002) The necessity of transborder cooperation as a condition for the conservation of the natural and cultural importance of Western-Central Rhodope Mountain range S. Psaroudas (Eds) Protected areas in the Southern Balkans Hellenic Ministry of the Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works/ARCTUROS Thessaloniki, Greece 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • I Maharana S. C. Rai E. Sharma (2000) ArticleTitleEnvironmental economics of the Khangchendzonga National Park in the Sikkim Himalaya, India GeoJournal 50 329–337 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011032813319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. F. Mathieu I. H. Langford W. Kenyon (2003) ArticleTitleValuing marine parks in a developing country: A case study of the Seychelles Environment and Development Economics 8 373–390 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1355770X0300196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A McNeely (1994) ArticleTitleProtected areas for the 21st century: Working to provide benefits to society Biodiversity and Conservation 3 390–405 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00057797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meine, C. 1996. Bulgaria’s biological diversity: Conservation status and needs assessment. Volumes I and II, D.C., Biodiversity Support Program. ISBN: 1-887531-21-1

  • I. Mendes (2003) ArticleTitlePricing recreation use of national parks for more efficient nature conservation: an application to the Portuguese case European Environment 13 288–302 Occurrence Handle10.1002/eet.328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. R. Miller J. E. Dickinson D. J. Pearlman-Houghe (2001) ArticleTitleQuiet enjoyment in the national parks of England and Wales: public understanding of the term and its influence on attitudes towards recreational activities Leisure Studies 20 19–40 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02614360150205483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works. 2003. Protected areas: Towards an integrated environmental management system. Athens, 212 pp

  • D. Moran (1994) ArticleTitleContingent valuation and biodiversity: Measuring the user surplus of Kenyan protected areas Biodiversity and Conservation 3 663–684 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00126859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Mühlhäusler A. Peace (2001) ArticleTitleDiscourses of ecotourism: The case of Fraser Island, Queensland Language and Communication 21 359–380 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00006-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. P. Noe W. E. Hammit R. D. Bixler (1997) ArticleTitlePark user perceptions of resource and use impacts under varied situations in three National Parks Journal of Environmental Management 49 323–336 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1995.0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Obua D. M. Harding (1996) ArticleTitleVisitor characteristics and attitudes towards Kibale National Park, Uganda Tourism Management 17 495–505 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(96)00067-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K Papageorgiou (2001) ArticleTitleA combined park management framework based on regulatory and behavioral strategies: Use of visitors’ knowledge to assess effectiveness Environmental Management 28 61–73 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010207 Occurrence Handle11437001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pyrovetsi G. Daoutopoulos (1997) ArticleTitleContrasts in conservation attitudes and agricultural practices between farmers operating in wetlands and a plain in Macedonia, Greece Environmental Conservation 24 76–82 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S037689299700012X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pyrovetsi G. Daoutopoulos (1999) ArticleTitleFarmers’ needs for nature conservation education in Greece Journal of Environmental Management 56 147–157 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1999.0265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. C. Reynolds D. Braithwaite (2001) ArticleTitleTowards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism Tourism Management 22 31–42 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00018-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Roovers M. Hermy H. Gulinck (2002) ArticleTitleVisitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanization in central Belgium Landscape and Urban Planning 59 129–145 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00011-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Ryan K. Hughes S. Chirgwin (2000) ArticleTitleThe gaze, spectacle and ecotourism Annals of Tourism Research 27 148–163 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00061-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Shechter B. Reiser N. Zaitsev (1998) ArticleTitleMeasuring passive use value Environmental and Resource Economics 12 457–478 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008397411466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. S. Shin R. Jaakson (1997) ArticleTitleWilderness quality and visitors’ wilderness attitudes: management implications Environmental Management 21 225–232 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002679900021 Occurrence Handle9008073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • S. Shultz J. Pinazzo M. Cifuentes (1998) ArticleTitleOpportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: Evidence from Costa Rica Environment and Development Economics 3 131–149 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1355770X98000072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Skordas P. Birtsas O. Maslarinou (2002) PAN-THIRAS 2002 all about hunting Macedonia-Thrace Federation of Hunters Thessaloniki, 228

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameSPSS (1992) SPSS base system’s user’s guide, release 5.0 edition SPSS Inc Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Trakolis (2001a) ArticleTitlePerceptions, preferences, and reactions of local inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece Environmental Management 28 665–676 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D Trakolis (2001b) ArticleTitleLocal people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece Journal of Environmental Management 61 227–241 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.2000.0410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Trakolis P. Platis I. Meliadis (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity and Conservation actions on Mount Voras, Greece Environmental Management 26 145–151 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Vokou N. Makrodimos M. Tziolas (2000) ArticleTitleVisitors in the National Park of Olympos: Characteristics, behaviors and views Oikotopia 18 36–39

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Walsh (1990) Statistics for the social sciences Harper and Row New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. C. L. White J. C. Lovett (1999) ArticleTitlePublic preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK Journal of Environmental Management 55 1–13 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1998.0250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Wilson C. Tisdell (2001) ArticleTitleSea turtles as a non-consumptive tourism resource especially in Australia Tourism Management 22 279–288 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00059-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This survey took place within the framework of the LIFE99NAT/GR/006498 project “Implementation of Management Plans in Gramos and Rhodope Areas, Greece.” During the summer and autumn of 2001 and 2002, the Greek environmental NGO ARCTUROS fielded research teams consisting of volunteers who interviewed visitors within the study area. We are grateful to S. Tziouvara, A. Klaro, B. Tzivintzeli, M. Tzimou, I. Vasileiou, E. Roubea, S. Papidaki, Z. Saloniti, A. Blassopoulou, R. Trigkou, K. Antonopoulou, E. Sdona, M. Maravellia, I. Isaak, and L. Gribilakou. The authors would also like to thank the Editor-in-Chief and one anonymous reviewer, as well as R. Richardson, D. Trakolis, and J.M. Halley, for their helpful comments on an early draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tasos Hovardas.

Appendix. Questionnaire

Appendix. Questionnaire

1. Are you aware of the initiative undertaken for the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex to become a National Park?

Yes

No

2. Do you agree with the initiative undertaken for the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex to become a National Park?

Yes

No

3. If the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex became a National Park, would you pay a conditional entrance fee in order to be able to visit the area?

Yes

No

4. How do you characterize your personal knowledge on the environmental elements of the area?

Poor

Moderate

Satisfactory

5. Which of the animals listed below occur (A) and should be protected in the area (B)?

A B

Brown Bear (Ursus arctos)

Gray Wolf (Canis lupus)

Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus)

Old World Grouse (Tetrao urogallus)

Wild Pig (Sus scrofa)

Lesser White-fronted Goose (Anser erythropus)

Chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra)

Otter (Lutra lutra)

Elk (Cervus elaphus)

6. The establishment of a National Park is attended by

prohibition of human activities.

regulation of human activities.

7. Most important for the conservation of the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex is

the observance of use restrictions.

guaranteeing locals’ and visitors’ access to the area.

8. Which of the factors listed below satisfied you most during your stay in the area?

Landscape/wilderness

Low tourist numbers

9. Which of the factors listed below disappointed you most during your stay in the area?

Lack of infrastructure

Litter-related impacts

10. Do you belong to an environmental group? a hunters’ club?

No group adherence

11. Education level

Elementary/high school

University

12. Age

13. Gender

Male

Female

14. Distance of place of residence

≤100km

>100km

15. How did you make the choice to visit the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex?

Travel agency/media

Friends/relatives

16. How long are you going to stay in the area?

Up to 2 nights

Longer

17. Date

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Machairas, I., Hovardas, T. Determining Visitors’ Dispositions Toward the Designation of a Greek National Park. Environmental Management 36, 73–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0251-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0251-7

Keywords

Navigation