ABSTRACT
This article presents the findings of the first major visitor survey conducted at the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex, situated in northern Greece. The study area is one of a number of sites planned to become National Parks under a recent initiative of the Greek government. We used a logistic regression method to define significant predictors of visitors’ awareness and attitude toward park designation, as well as their willingness to pay a conditional entrance fee. Study findings demonstrated that the probability of being aware of the park designation initiative is higher for visitors who obtained information from travel agencies or media to make their destination choice, compared to visitors who resorted to word-of-mouth recommendations. Knowledge and attitudes toward animals living in the study area revealed a limited influence on visitors’ dispositions toward park designation. The results of this study call for action to implement education programs for National Park users. These programs should aim at rendering the environmental characteristics of the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex to be significant predictors of visitors’ dispositions toward the study area. This would favor its uniqueness as a destination, as well as contribute to its long-term economic sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
InstitutionalAuthorNameARCTUROS (1999) Conservation of brown bear (Ursus arctos): Populations and habitats of brown bear in Greece. Volume A. Project ARCTOS 2nd phase Thessaloniki Greece
S. Baloglu K. W. McCleary (1999) ArticleTitleA model of destination image formation Annals of Tourism Research 26 868–897 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4
I. J. Bateman I. H. Langford (1997) ArticleTitleNon-users’ willingness to pay for a National Park: An application and critique of the contingent valuation method Regional Studies 31 571–582 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00343409750131703
P. Björk (2000) ArticleTitleEcotourism from a conceptual perspective, an extended definition of a unique tourism form International Journal of Tourism Research 2 189–202 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1522-1970(200005/06)2:3<189::AID-JTR195>3.0.CO;2-T
H. Briassoulis (1992) Environmental impacts of tourism: a framework for analysis and evaluation H. Briassoulis J. Straaten Particlevan der (Eds) Tourism and the environment: Regional, economic, and policy issues Kluwer Academic Press Dordrecht 11–22
M. W. Brunson D. K. Reiter (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest Journal of Environmental Management 46 31–41 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1996.0004
D. Crick-Furman R. Prentice (2000) ArticleTitleModeling tourists’ multiple values Annals of Tourism Research 27 69–92 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00041-9
Dafis, S., E. Papastergiadou, K. Georgiou, T. Georgiadis, M. Papageorgiou, and T. Lazaridou. 1996. The Greek ‘Habitat’ Project (Directive 92/43/EEC) Natura 2000: An overview. Final Project Report. Life Contract B4-3200/94/756. Commission of the European Communities DG XI. The Goulandris Natural History Museum
G. S. Dharmaratne F. Y. Sang L. J. Walling (2000) ArticleTitleTourism potentials for financing protected areas Annals of Tourism Research 27 590–610 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00109-7
E. M. Dougherty D. C. Fulton D. H. Anderson (2003) ArticleTitleThe influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park Society and Natural Resources 16 603–623 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08941920309187
A. Gerakis K. Kalburtji (1998) ArticleTitleAgricultural activities affecting the functions and values of Ramsar wetland sites of Greece Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 70 119–128
J. Gnoth (1997) ArticleTitleTourism motivation and expectation formation Annals of Tourism Research 24 283–304 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(97)80002-3
C. Goossens (2000) ArticleTitleTourism information and pleasure motivation Annals of Tourism Research 27 301–321 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00067-5
InstitutionalAuthorNameGreek National Tourism Organization–WWF Hellas (2000) Designing pilot projects for ecotourism development Hellenic Republic, Ministry of Development Athens 208 pp
D. N. Gujarati (1988) Basic econometrics McGraw-Hill Inc. New York
R. Hearne Z. M. Salinas (2002) ArticleTitleThe use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica Journal of Environmental Management 65 153–163 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.2001.0541 Occurrence Handle12197077
J. Heckman (1979) ArticleTitleSample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica 47 153–161
C. Heer H.-P. Rusterholz B. Baur (2003) ArticleTitleForest perception and knowledge of hikers and mountain bikers in two different areas in Northwestern Switzerland Environmental Management 31 709–723 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00267-003-3002-x Occurrence Handle14565692
Hovardas, T. 1999. The Dadia Forest Reserve: The protected area, the local community, and ecotourism development. Master’s Thesis. Aristotle University, School of Biology, Thessaloniki, 210 pp
B. P. Kaltenborn D. R. Williams (2002) ArticleTitleThe meaning of place: attachments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and locals Norwegian Journal of Geography 56 189–198
J Kerkvliet C. Nowell (2000) ArticleTitleTools for recreation management in parks: The case of the greater Yellowstone’s blue-ribbon fishery Ecological Economics 34 89–100 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00139-7
M. J. Kotchen S. D. Reiling (2000) ArticleTitleEnvironmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species Ecological Economics 32 93–107 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00069-5
E. Koutrakis T. Lazaridou M. D. Argyropoulou (2003) ArticleTitlePromoting integrated management in the Strymonikos coastal zone (Greece): A step-by-step process Coastal Management 31 195–200 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08920750390168417
C.-K. Lee S.-Y. Han (2002) ArticleTitleEstimating the use and preservation values of National Parks’ tourism resources using a contingent valuation method Tourism Management 23 531–540 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00010-9
K. Lindberg (1991) Policies for maximizing nature tourism’s ecological and economic benefits World Resources Institute New York, 37 pp
I Machairas (2002) The necessity of transborder cooperation as a condition for the conservation of the natural and cultural importance of Western-Central Rhodope Mountain range S. Psaroudas (Eds) Protected areas in the Southern Balkans Hellenic Ministry of the Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works/ARCTUROS Thessaloniki, Greece 205–213
I Maharana S. C. Rai E. Sharma (2000) ArticleTitleEnvironmental economics of the Khangchendzonga National Park in the Sikkim Himalaya, India GeoJournal 50 329–337 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011032813319
L. F. Mathieu I. H. Langford W. Kenyon (2003) ArticleTitleValuing marine parks in a developing country: A case study of the Seychelles Environment and Development Economics 8 373–390 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1355770X0300196
J. A McNeely (1994) ArticleTitleProtected areas for the 21st century: Working to provide benefits to society Biodiversity and Conservation 3 390–405 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00057797
Meine, C. 1996. Bulgaria’s biological diversity: Conservation status and needs assessment. Volumes I and II, D.C., Biodiversity Support Program. ISBN: 1-887531-21-1
I. Mendes (2003) ArticleTitlePricing recreation use of national parks for more efficient nature conservation: an application to the Portuguese case European Environment 13 288–302 Occurrence Handle10.1002/eet.328
L. R. Miller J. E. Dickinson D. J. Pearlman-Houghe (2001) ArticleTitleQuiet enjoyment in the national parks of England and Wales: public understanding of the term and its influence on attitudes towards recreational activities Leisure Studies 20 19–40 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02614360150205483
Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works. 2003. Protected areas: Towards an integrated environmental management system. Athens, 212 pp
D. Moran (1994) ArticleTitleContingent valuation and biodiversity: Measuring the user surplus of Kenyan protected areas Biodiversity and Conservation 3 663–684 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00126859
P. Mühlhäusler A. Peace (2001) ArticleTitleDiscourses of ecotourism: The case of Fraser Island, Queensland Language and Communication 21 359–380 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00006-4
F. P. Noe W. E. Hammit R. D. Bixler (1997) ArticleTitlePark user perceptions of resource and use impacts under varied situations in three National Parks Journal of Environmental Management 49 323–336 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1995.0093
J. Obua D. M. Harding (1996) ArticleTitleVisitor characteristics and attitudes towards Kibale National Park, Uganda Tourism Management 17 495–505 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(96)00067-2
K Papageorgiou (2001) ArticleTitleA combined park management framework based on regulatory and behavioral strategies: Use of visitors’ knowledge to assess effectiveness Environmental Management 28 61–73 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010207 Occurrence Handle11437001
M. Pyrovetsi G. Daoutopoulos (1997) ArticleTitleContrasts in conservation attitudes and agricultural practices between farmers operating in wetlands and a plain in Macedonia, Greece Environmental Conservation 24 76–82 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S037689299700012X
M. Pyrovetsi G. Daoutopoulos (1999) ArticleTitleFarmers’ needs for nature conservation education in Greece Journal of Environmental Management 56 147–157 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1999.0265
P. C. Reynolds D. Braithwaite (2001) ArticleTitleTowards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism Tourism Management 22 31–42 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00018-2
P. Roovers M. Hermy H. Gulinck (2002) ArticleTitleVisitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanization in central Belgium Landscape and Urban Planning 59 129–145 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00011-7
C. Ryan K. Hughes S. Chirgwin (2000) ArticleTitleThe gaze, spectacle and ecotourism Annals of Tourism Research 27 148–163 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00061-4
M. Shechter B. Reiser N. Zaitsev (1998) ArticleTitleMeasuring passive use value Environmental and Resource Economics 12 457–478 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008397411466
W. S. Shin R. Jaakson (1997) ArticleTitleWilderness quality and visitors’ wilderness attitudes: management implications Environmental Management 21 225–232 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002679900021 Occurrence Handle9008073
S. Shultz J. Pinazzo M. Cifuentes (1998) ArticleTitleOpportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: Evidence from Costa Rica Environment and Development Economics 3 131–149 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1355770X98000072
K. Skordas P. Birtsas O. Maslarinou (2002) PAN-THIRAS 2002 all about hunting Macedonia-Thrace Federation of Hunters Thessaloniki, 228
InstitutionalAuthorNameSPSS (1992) SPSS base system’s user’s guide, release 5.0 edition SPSS Inc Chicago
D. Trakolis (2001a) ArticleTitlePerceptions, preferences, and reactions of local inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece Environmental Management 28 665–676 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010251
D Trakolis (2001b) ArticleTitleLocal people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece Journal of Environmental Management 61 227–241 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.2000.0410
D. Trakolis P. Platis I. Meliadis (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity and Conservation actions on Mount Voras, Greece Environmental Management 26 145–151 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010077
D. Vokou N. Makrodimos M. Tziolas (2000) ArticleTitleVisitors in the National Park of Olympos: Characteristics, behaviors and views Oikotopia 18 36–39
A. Walsh (1990) Statistics for the social sciences Harper and Row New York
P. C. L. White J. C. Lovett (1999) ArticleTitlePublic preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK Journal of Environmental Management 55 1–13 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1998.0250
C. Wilson C. Tisdell (2001) ArticleTitleSea turtles as a non-consumptive tourism resource especially in Australia Tourism Management 22 279–288 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00059-5
Acknowledgments
This survey took place within the framework of the LIFE99NAT/GR/006498 project “Implementation of Management Plans in Gramos and Rhodope Areas, Greece.” During the summer and autumn of 2001 and 2002, the Greek environmental NGO ARCTUROS fielded research teams consisting of volunteers who interviewed visitors within the study area. We are grateful to S. Tziouvara, A. Klaro, B. Tzivintzeli, M. Tzimou, I. Vasileiou, E. Roubea, S. Papidaki, Z. Saloniti, A. Blassopoulou, R. Trigkou, K. Antonopoulou, E. Sdona, M. Maravellia, I. Isaak, and L. Gribilakou. The authors would also like to thank the Editor-in-Chief and one anonymous reviewer, as well as R. Richardson, D. Trakolis, and J.M. Halley, for their helpful comments on an early draft of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix. Questionnaire
Appendix. Questionnaire
1. Are you aware of the initiative undertaken for the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex to become a National Park?
Yes
No
2. Do you agree with the initiative undertaken for the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex to become a National Park?
Yes
No
3. If the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex became a National Park, would you pay a conditional entrance fee in order to be able to visit the area?
Yes
No
4. How do you characterize your personal knowledge on the environmental elements of the area?
Poor
Moderate
Satisfactory
5. Which of the animals listed below occur (A) and should be protected in the area (B)?
A B
Brown Bear (Ursus arctos)
Gray Wolf (Canis lupus)
Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus)
Old World Grouse (Tetrao urogallus)
Wild Pig (Sus scrofa)
Lesser White-fronted Goose (Anser erythropus)
Chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra)
Otter (Lutra lutra)
Elk (Cervus elaphus)
6. The establishment of a National Park is attended by
prohibition of human activities.
regulation of human activities.
7. Most important for the conservation of the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex is
the observance of use restrictions.
guaranteeing locals’ and visitors’ access to the area.
8. Which of the factors listed below satisfied you most during your stay in the area?
Landscape/wilderness
Low tourist numbers
9. Which of the factors listed below disappointed you most during your stay in the area?
Lack of infrastructure
Litter-related impacts
10. Do you belong to an environmental group? a hunters’ club?
No group adherence
11. Education level
Elementary/high school
University
12. Age
13. Gender
Male
Female
14. Distance of place of residence
≤100km
>100km
15. How did you make the choice to visit the Central Rhodope Mountain Complex?
Travel agency/media
Friends/relatives
16. How long are you going to stay in the area?
Up to 2 nights
Longer
17. Date
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machairas, I., Hovardas, T. Determining Visitors’ Dispositions Toward the Designation of a Greek National Park. Environmental Management 36, 73–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0251-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0251-7