Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Landowner Activities Related to Birds Across Rural-to-Urban Landscapes

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluctuations of bird abundances in the Midwest region of the United States have been attributed to such factors as landscape change, habitat fragmentation, depredation, and supplemental feeding. However, no attempt has been made to estimate the collective role of landowner activities that may influence birds across a landscape. To investigate how landowners might influence birds when the majority (> 90%) of land is privately owned, we surveyed all 1694 private domestic landowners living on three breeding bird survey routes (∼120 km) that represent a continuum of rural-to-urban landscapes in Southeastern Michigan from October through December 2000. Our survey was designed to investigate (1) the proportion of landowners involved in bird feeding, providing bird houses, planting or maintaining vegetation for birds, gardening, landscaping, applying fertilizer, and applying pesticides or herbicides; (2) whether differences existed between urban, suburban, and rural landowner activities; and (3) whether landowners that carried out a given activity were sociodemographically different from those who did not. Of the 968 respondents (58.5% response rate), 912 (94%) carried out at least one of the activities on their land and the average landowner carried out 3.7 activities. A total of 65.6% fed birds, 45.7% provided bird houses, 54.6% planted or maintained vegetation for birds, 72.7% gardened, 72.3% landscaped, 49.3% applied fertilizer, and 25.2% applied pesticides or herbicides. Significant differences existed between the landscapes, with rural landowners having more bird houses and applying pesticides or herbicides in greater frequency. Similarly, urban landowners had a greater density of bird feeders and houses, but planted or maintained vegetation in the lowest frequency. Participation in activities varied by demographic factors, such as age, gender, and occupation. Scaling each activity to all landowners, including nonrespondents, across all landscapes indicates that between 14% and 82% of landowners may be engaged in a particular activity, with application of pesticides or herbicides having the least potential involvement (13.9%–55.4%) and gardening having the greatest potential involvement (40.1%–81.6%). Taken collectively, our results indicate that landowners are both intentionally and unintentionally engaged in a wide range of activities that are likely to influence bird populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. D. Basili S. A. Temple (1999) ArticleTitleDickcissels and crop damage in Venezuela: Defining the problem with ecological models. Ecological Applications 9 732–739

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. A. Bishop H. J. Boermans P. Ng G. D. Campbell J. Struger (1998a) ArticleTitleHealth of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) nesting in pesticide-sprayed apple orchards in Ontario, Canada. I. Immunological parameters. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 55 531–559

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. A. Bishop G. J. Van Der Kraak P. Ng J. E. G. Smits A. Hontela (1998b) ArticleTitleHealth of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) nesting in pesticide-sprayed apple orchards in Ontario,Canada. II. Sex and thyroid hormone concentrations and testes development. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 55 561–581

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. A. Bishop B. Collins P. Mineau N. M. Burgess W. F. Read C. Risley (2000) ArticleTitleReproduction of cavity-nesting birds in pesticide-sprayed apple orchards in Southern Ontario, Canada, 1988–1994. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19 588–599 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhtlynurk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Blackburn W. Arthur (2001) ArticleTitleComparative abundance of centipedes on organic and conventional farms, and its possible relation to declines in farmland bird populations. Basic and Applied Ecology 2 373–381

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. Blair (1996) ArticleTitleLand use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6 506–519

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Böhning-Gaese M. L. Taper J. H. Brown (1993) ArticleTitleAre declines in North American insectivorous songbirds due to causes on the breeding range? Conservation Biology 7 76–84 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07010076.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. W. Brickle D. G. C. Harper N. J. Aebischer S. H. Cockayne (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of agricultural intensification on the breeding success of corn buntings Miliaria calandra. Journal of Applied Ecology 37 742–755 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00542.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. C. Brittingham S. A. Temple (1986) ArticleTitleA survey of avian mortality at winter feeders. Wildlife Society Bulletin 14 445–450

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. C. Brittingham S. A. Temple (1988) ArticleTitleImpacts of supplemental feeding on survival rates of Black-capped Chickadees. Ecology 69 581–589

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. C. Brittingham S. A. Temple (1989) ArticleTitlePatterns of feeder use by Wisconsin birds: a survey of WSO members. The Passenger Pigeon 51 321–324

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Cam J. D. Nichols J. R. Sauer J. E. Hines C. H. Flather (2000) ArticleTitleRelative species richness and community completeness: birds and urbanization in the Mid-Atlantic states. Ecological Applications 10 1196–1210

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Carson (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. B. Churcher J. H. Lawton (1987) ArticleTitlePredation by domestic cats in an English village. Journal of Zoology 212 439–455

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. S. Coleman S. A. Temple (1993) ArticleTitleRural residents’ free-ranging domestic cats: a survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21 381–390

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. J. Cowie S. A. Hinsley (1988) ArticleTitleThe provision of food and the use of bird feeders in suburban gardens. Bird Study 35 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Czech P. K. Devers P. R. Krausman (2001) ArticleTitleThe relationship of gender to species conservation attitudes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. C. Daily (1997) Introduction: What are ecosystem services? G. C. Daily (Eds) Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press Washington, D.C. 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. H. Dale S. Brown R. A. Haeuber N. T. Hobbs N. Huntley R. J. Naiman W. E. Riebsame M. G. Turner T. J. Valone (2000) ArticleTitleEcological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10 639–670

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. M. DeGraaf G. M. Witman (1979) Trees, shrubs, and vines for attracting birds. University of Massachusetts Press Amherst, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. A. Dillman (1978) Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley-Interscience New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. A. Dillman (2000) Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. F. Doherty Jr. T. C. Grubb SuffixJr. (2002) ArticleTitleSurvivorship of permanent-resident birds in a fragmented forested landscape. Ecology 83 844–857

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. M. Donovan C. H. Flather (2002) ArticleTitleRelationships among North American songbird trends, habitat fragmentation, and landscape occupancy. Ecological Applications 12 364–374

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. H. Dunn D. L. Tessaglia (1994) ArticleTitlePredation of birds at feeders in winter. Journal of Field Ornithology 65 8–16

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. T. Emlen (1974) ArticleTitleAn urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76 184–197

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. H. Flather J. R. Sauer (1996) ArticleTitleUsing landscape ecology to test hypotheses about large-scale abundance patterns in migratory birds. Ecology 77 28–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Gallagher B. Carpenter (1997) ArticleTitleHuman-dominated ecosystems. Science 277 485 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.277.5325.485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. S. Giesbrecht C. D. Ankney (1998) ArticleTitlePredation risk and foraging behaviour: An experimental study of birds at feeders. Canadian Field-Naturalist 112 668–675

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. J. Heske S. K. Robinson J. D. Brawn (2001) ArticleTitleNest predation and neotropical migrant songbirds: Piecing together the fragments. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29 52–61

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Hohtola (1978) ArticleTitleDifferential changes in bird community structure with urbanisation: a study in Central Finland. Ornis Scandinavica 9 94–100

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Hostetler (1999) ArticleTitleScale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 45 15–19 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00025-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Hostetler C. S. Holling (2000) ArticleTitleDetecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 4 25–54 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009587719462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. F. Hutchinson J. L. Vankat (1998) ArticleTitleLandscape structure and spread of the exotic shrub Lonicera maackii (Amur honeysuckle) in Southwestern Ohio forests. American Midland Naturalist 139 383–390

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. C. James C. E. McCulloch D. A. Wiedenfeld (1996) ArticleTitleNew approaches to the analysis of population trends in land birds. Ecology 77 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. C. James (1998) The growing pains of avian conservation biology. J. M. Marzluff R. Sallabanks (Eds) Avian conservation: Research and management. Island Press Washington, D.C. 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. R. Kellert J. K. Berry (1987) ArticleTitleAttitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15 363–371

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lepczyk, C. A. (2002) “Effects of human activities on birds across landscapes of the Midwest.” Dissertation, Michigan State University, East lansing, MI

  39. Lepczyk, C. A., . Mertig, A. G, and Liu, J. 2002. Landowner perceptions and activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes. in D. Chamberlain and Wilson, E. (eds.), Avian landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual UK-IALE Conference. 251–259 pp.

  40. C. A. Lepczyk A. G. Mertig J. Liu. (2004) ArticleTitleLandowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biological Conservation 115 191–201 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00107-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Liu (2001) ArticleTitleIntegrating ecology with human demography, behavior, and socioeconomics: Needs and approaches. Ecological Modeling 140 1–8 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00265-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. J. Liu Z. Ouyang Z. Tan W. Taylor R. Groop Y. Tan H. Zhang (1999) ArticleTitleA framework for evaluating effects of human factors on wildlife habitat: the case of the giant pandas. Conservation Biology 13 1360–1370 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98418.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. J. Liu M. Linderman Z. Ouyang L. An J. Yang H. Zhang (2001) ArticleTitleEcological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292 98–101 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1058104 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXis1Grtrk%3D Occurrence Handle11292872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. J. M. Marzluff F. R. Gehlbach D. A. Manuwal (1998) Urban environments: influences on avifauna and challenges for the avian conservationist. J. M. Marzluff R. Sallabanks (Eds) Avian conservation: Research and management. Island Press Washington, D.C. 283–305

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. J. McDonnell S. T. A. Pickett (1993) Humans as components of ecosystems: The ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Newton (1995) ArticleTitleThe contribution of some recent research on birds to ecological understanding. Journal of Animal Ecology 64 675–696 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD38bmvFc%3D Occurrence Handle8216018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. E. P. Odum (1959) Fundamentals of ecology. 2nd Ed. W. B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Parlange (1998) ArticleTitleThe city as ecosystem: urban long-term ecological research projects aim to put the pieces together. BioScience 48 581–585

    Google Scholar 

  49. N. F. Payne F. C. Bryant (1994) Techniques for wildlife habitat management of uplands. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  50. B. G. Peterjohn J. R. Sauer (1993) ArticleTitleNorth American Breeding Bird Survey annual summary 1990–1991. Bird Populations 1 52–67 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXmvFKltbs%3D Occurrence Handle7942312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. J. Pinowski M. Barkowska A. H. Kruszewicz A. G. Kruszewicz (1994) ArticleTitleThe causes of mortality of eggs and nestlings of Passer spp. Journal of Biosciences 19 441–451

    Google Scholar 

  52. J. H. Rappole M. V. McDonald (1994) ArticleTitleCause and effect in population declines of migratory birds. Auk 111 652–660

    Google Scholar 

  53. C. L. Redman (1999) ArticleTitleHuman dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems 2 296–298 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. C. S. Robbins J. R. Sauer R. S. Greenberg S. Droege (1989) ArticleTitlePopulation declines in North American birds that migrate to the neotropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 86 7658–7662 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BD3Mjltlw%3D Occurrence Handle2798430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. S. K. Robinson F. R. Thomposon III T. M. Donovan D. R. Whitehead J. Faaborg (1995) ArticleTitleRegional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267 1987–1990 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXkslOktbY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rutledge, D.T. (2001) ““Changes in land cover and wildfire habitats in two watersheds in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan.” Dissertation, Michigan State University, East lansing, MI

  57. D. T. Rutledge C. A. Lepczyk (2002) Landscape change: Patterns, effects, and implications for adaptive management of wildlife resources. J. Liu W. W. Taylor (Eds) Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resources Management. Cambridge University Press Cambridge 312–333

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sargent, M., and K. S. Carter. 1999. Managing Michigan’s wildlife: A landowner’s guide. Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Michigan United Conservation Club, Lansing, MI.

  59. Schmidt, K.A., Whelan, C. J. (1999) “Effects of exotic Lonicera and Rhammus on songbird nest predation.” Conservation Biology 13: 1502–1506

  60. SPSS, Inc. 2000. Systat Standard Version, version 10. Chicago, IL

  61. D. Stokes L. Stokes (1987) The bird feeder book. Little, Brown and Co. New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. Terborgh (1989) Where Have All The Birds Gone? Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. K. Terres (1953) Songbirds in your garden: Thomas Y. Crowell Co. New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  64. C. Tufts P. Loewer (1995) The National Wildlife Federation’s guide to gardening for wildlife: How to create a beautiful backyard habitat for birds, butterflies, and other wildlife. St. Martin’s Press New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  65. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1993. 1990 Census of population, social and economic characteristics. Michigan. Section 2 of 2. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  66. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1997. 1996 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated Recreation.

  67. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2002. 2001 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated Recreation.

  68. J. A. Vickery J. R. Tallowin R. E. Feber E. J. Asteraki P. W. Atkinson R. J. Fuller V. K. Brown (2001) ArticleTitleThe management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources. Journal of Applied Ecology 38 647–664 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00626.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. P. M. Vitousek H. A. Mooney J. Lubchenco J. M. Melillo (1997) ArticleTitleHuman domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. Science 277 494–499 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkvVektLs%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. K. A. Vogt M. Grove H. Asbjornsen K. B. Maxwell D. J. Vogt R. Siguroardóttir B. C. Larson L. Schibli M. Dove (2002) Linking ecological and social scales for natural resource management. J. Liu W. W. Taylor (Eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resources management. Cambridge University Press Cambridge 143–175

    Google Scholar 

  71. J. V. Wells K. V. Rosenberg E. H. Dunn D. L. Tessaglia-Hymes A. A. Dhondt (1998) ArticleTitleFeeder counts as indicators of spatial and temporal variation in winter abundance of resident birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 69 577–586

    Google Scholar 

  72. D. Wiedner P. Kerlinger (1990) ArticleTitleEconomics of birding: A national survey of active birders. American Birds 44 209–213

    Google Scholar 

  73. W. H. Wilson (2001) ArticleTitleThe effects of supplemental feeding on wintering Black-capped Chickadees (Poecile atricapilla) in central Maine: population and individual responses. Wilson Bulletin 113 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  74. J. H. Zar (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff at the Ingham, Livingston, Oakland, and Washtenaw county Equalization Offices, which allowed us access to landowner records. Keith Pardieck and Jane Fallon at the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center kindly assisted with providing maps and details of BBS routes. We are grateful to Kimberly Baker, Jayson Egeler, and Mike Mascarenhas for assisting with the survey logistics and data entry. Robert Holsman and Sam Riffell provided critical review of the draft survey. Daniel Brown, Katherine Gross, Nan Johnson, and Patricia Soranno, critically reviewed the manuscript and provided many helpful suggestions. In addition, we would especially like to thank Andrew Cannon, Virginia Dale, Mark Hostetler, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful and constructive reviews that greatly improved the clarity of the manuscript. Support for this research was provided by a Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station grant and an N.S.F. CAREER Award to J. Liu, a Michigan State University College of Social Science Grant to J. Liu, A. Mertig, and P. Sorrano, and a U.S. E.P.A. Science To Achieve Results (STAR) Fellowship (Grant no. U-91580101-0) to C.A. Lepczyk. This paper was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for C.A. Lepczyk’s doctoral degree in Fisheries and Wildlife, and the Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior at Michigan State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lepczyk, C., Mertig, A. & Liu, J. Assessing Landowner Activities Related to Birds Across Rural-to-Urban Landscapes. Environmental Management 33, 110–125 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0036-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0036-z

Keywords

Navigation