Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rhinofiller: Fat Grafting (Surgical) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (Non-Surgical)

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The author presented his experience using "fat grafting" (FG) and "hyaluronic acid" (HA) techniques in nasal remodeling.

Objectives

The paper aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of FG and HA in nasal remodeling for aesthetic improvement.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted. 15 patients affected by soft defects of the dorsum, low and boxy nasal tip, and hidden columella, were treated with FG (study group—SG), comparing results with the control group (CG) (n = 17) treated with hyaluronic acid (HA). Post-operative follow-up took place at 1, 2, 4, weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually.

Results

73.7% of SG patients showed excellent cosmetic results after 1 year compared with only 29.7% of CG patients. At one-month, major part of people who underwent the treatments (FG and HA) referred to satisfaction with the resulting volume contours (p = 0.389). 88.3% of CG patients versus 53.8% of SG described the HA and FG injection, respectively, as a very comfortable and non-invasive procedure. As expected, patient satisfaction with the appearance of nasal contouring was higher in the FG group at 1 year.

Conclusions

FG and HA were safe and effective in this series of cases performed.

Level of evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winslow C (2016) Filling the midface: injectables. Facial Plast Surg 32(5):473–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Maio M, Swift A, Signorini M, Fagien S (2017) Aesthetic leaders in facial aesthetics consensus C. Facial assessment and injection guide for botulinum toxin and injectable hyaluronic acid fillers: focus on the upper face. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(2):265e-e276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng ZF, Hao YS, Yin JFY, Lei XX, Cheng BA, Huang WH (2021) Autogenous fat transplantation and botulinum toxin injection into the masseter muscle to create an ideal oval face. Aesthet Surg J 41(6):Np579–Np588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Margulies IG, Salzberg CA (2019) The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades. Gland Surg 8(1):3–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wainwright DJ, Bury SB (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in the management of the burn patient. Aesthet Surg J 31(7):13s–23s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reyzelman AM, Bazarov I (2015) Human acellular dermal wound matrix for treatment of DFU: literature review and analysis. J Wound Care 24(3):128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gentile P (2021) Breast silicone gel implants versus autologous fat grafting: biomaterials and bioactive materials in comparison. J Clin Med 10(15):3310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gentile P, Kothari A, Casella D, Calabrese C (2020) Fat graft enhanced with adipose-derived stem cells in aesthetic breast augmentation: clinical, histological, and instrumental evaluation. Aesthet Surg J 40(9):962–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gentile P, Casella D, Palma E, Calabrese C (2019) engineered fat graft enhanced with adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells for regenerative medicine: clinical, histological and instrumental evaluation in breast reconstruction. J Clin Med 8(4):504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentile P, De Angelis B, Di Pietro V, Amorosi V, Scioli MG, Orlandi A, Cervelli V (2018) Gentle is better: the original “Gentle Technique” for fat placement in breast lipofilling. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 11(3):120–126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentile P, Sterodimas A, Calabrese C, Garcovich S (2021) Systematic review: advances of fat tissue engineering as bioactive scaffold, bioactive material, and source for adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in wound and scar treatment. Stem Cell Res Ther 12(1):318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gentile P (2021) New strategies in plastic surgery: autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells contained in fat grafting improves symptomatic scars. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 26(8):255–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gentile P, Sterodimas A, Calabrese C, De Angelis B, Trivisonno A, Pizzicannella J, Dionisi L, De Fazio D, Garcovich S (2020) Regenerative application of stromal vascular fraction cells enhanced fat graft maintenance: clinical assessment in face rejuvenation. Expert Opin Biol Ther 20(12):1503–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gentile P, Garcovich S (2021) Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) against ultraviolet (UV) radiation effects and the skin photoaging. Biomedicines 9(5):532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimaldi M, Gentile P, Labardi L, Silvi E, Trimarco A, Cervelli V (2008) Lipostructure technique in romberg syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 19(4):1089–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cervelli V, Gentile P (2009) Use of cell fat mixed with platelet gel in progressive hemifacial atrophy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(1):22–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gentile P, Garcovich S (2021) Systematic review: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma and biomaterials as new regenerative strategies in chronic skin wounds and soft tissue defects. Int J Mol Sci 22(4):1538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schuklenk U, Ashcroft R (2000) International research ethics. Bioethics 14:158–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A, Crosby MA (2007) The role of hyaluronic acid fillers (Restylane) in facial cosmetic surgery: review and technical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:41S-54S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas WW, Bucky L, Friedman O (2016) Injectables in the nose: facts and controversies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 24:379–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen E, Yatziv Y, Leibovitch I, Kesler A, Cnaan RB, Klein A et al (2016) A case report of ophthalmic artery emboli secondary to calcium hydroxylapatite filler injection for nose augmentation—long-term outcome. BMC Ophthalmol 16:98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li X, Du L, Lu JJ (2015) A novel hypothesis of visual loss secondary to cosmetic facial filler injection. Ann Plast Surg 75:258–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liew S, Scamp T, de Maio M, Halstead M (2016) Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler to correct aesthetically detracting or deficient features of the asian nose: a prospective, open-label, long term study. Aesthet Surg J 36:760–772

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grunebaum LD, Bogdan Allemann I, Dayan S, Mandy S, Baumann L (2009) The risk of alar necrosis associated with dermal filler injection. Dermatol Surg 35:1635–1640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazzeri D, Agostini T, Figus M, Nardi M, Pantaloni M, Lazzeri S (2012) Blindness following cosmetic injections of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:995–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carruthers JD, Fagien S, Rohrich RJ, Weinkle S, Carruthers A (2014) Blindness caused by cosmetic filler injection: a review of cause and therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:1197–1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scheuer JF 3rd, Sieber DA, Pezeshk RA, Gassman AA, Campbell CF, Rohrich RJ (2017) Facial danger zones: techniques to maximize safety during soft-tissue filler injections. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1103–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Westley S, Mistry R, Dheansa B (2021) Accuracy of virtual assessment in hand trauma. JPRAS Open 31:92–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Guarro G, Cozzani F, Rossini M, Bonati E, Del Rio P (2021) Wounds morphologic assessment: application and reproducibility of a virtual measuring system, pilot study. Acta Biomed 92:e2021227

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Harrar H, Myers S, Ghanem AM (2018) Art or science? An Evidence-based approach to human facial beauty a quantitative analysis towards an informed clinical aesthetic practice. Aesthet Plast Surg 42:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author received no financial support for this article’s research, authorship, and publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PG designed the studies, performed the procedures, analyzed the results, wrote the paper, wrote an editing review, dealt with methodology and validation, performed the data analysis, and conducted the study as the leader.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Gentile.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol, which was the object of two university master's degrees titled "Plastic Aesthetic Surgery of Facial District" and “Regenerative Surgery and Medicine in Wound Care Management”, was approved with Rectoral Decree (D.R. n. 1794/2018) of September 19, 2018, and the Ethics on Research Committee of the School of Medicine, “Tor Vergata” University, Rome, Italy, with registration number #0031036/2018. All the patients received detailed oral and written information about the study, including the risks, benefits, and alternative therapies, and signed an informed consent form and a photo-release form before any study procedures. Additionally, about the FG, the protocols adopted were performed following the European rules (1394/2007 EC) and EMA/CAT recommendations (20 June 2014 EMA/CAT/600280/2010 Rev 1). The study has been developed in agreement with research contract #1467/2017 and associate professor contract #13489/2021 between the first author P.G., and the University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gentile, P. Rhinofiller: Fat Grafting (Surgical) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (Non-Surgical). Aesth Plast Surg 47, 702–713 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03209-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03209-7

Keywords

Navigation