Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Bifidus pedicle”, The Use of Bilobed Superomedial Pedicle for Breast Reshaping Following Upper Outer Quadrantectomy: A New Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Technique

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this work was to describe our technique, the “Bifidus pedicle”, which is a modification of the superomedial pedicle, for managing large breast cancers (BCs) in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) in patients with medium/large breasts and associated ptosis. Observed complications, cosmetic outcome and oncologic safety were also reported.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients underwent our modification of the superomedial pedicle combined with a Wise skin resection pattern for large BCs in the UOQ. All patients underwent contralateral Wise pattern breast reduction/mastopexy for symmetry.

Results

The average weight of the quadrantectomy specimen was 235 grams (range: 36–400 grams). Mean free tumour margin was 19.4 mm (range: 16–30). Mean operative time was 165 minutes (range: 150–220). Eight (13.2%) breasts had minor complications: two partial NAC necrosis, and six minimal wound dehiscences. Mean follow-up was 22 months (range: 12–30). Overall satisfaction rate was 91%; patients reported to be satisfied the most with the shape (92%) of the breasts, the achieved symmetry (94%), and the volume (85%), focusing on the fullness in the UOQ.

Conclusions

Our Bifidus pedicle allowed to fill even wide defects in the UOQ, because we selectively employed it in patients with medium to large ptotic breasts where the lower pole had enough tissue to be displaced. Satisfactory cosmetic and oncologic outcomes were achieved with low complication rate.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi PL, Raposio E (2017) Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 21:2572–2585

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A et al (1998) Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 41:471–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S et al (2012) Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg 99:1389–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Silverstein MJ, Savalia N, Khan S et al (2015) Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy. Breast J 21:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dikmans REG, Nene LEH, Mb B et al (2017) The aesthetic items scale: a tool for the evaluation of aesthetic outcome after breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:e1254. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Foustanos A, Panagiotopoulos K, Skouras G (2011) Intraoperative modification of pitanguy technique of reduction mammaplasty for elevation of the nipple-areola complex in case of severe breast ptosis. Aesth Plast Surg 35:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foustanos A (2009) Double flap technique: an alternative mastopexy approach. In: Shiffman MA (ed) Mastopexy and breast reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Wueringer E, Tschabitscher M (2003) New aspects of the topography of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension. Eur J Morphol 40:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LaTrenta GS, Hoffman LA (1994) Breast reduction. In: Rees TD, LaTrenta GS (eds) Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 971–975

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crown A, Scovel LG, Rocha FG, Scott EJ, Wecheter DG, Grumley JW (2019) Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery is associated with a lower rate of surgical site complications compared to standard breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg 217:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crown A, Laskin R, Rocha FG, Grumley J (2019) Extreme oncoplasty: expanding indications for breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg 217:851–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati M (2010) Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and a quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1375–2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berry MG, Ballester M, Fitoussi A, Couturand B, Salmon R (2008) Lateral mammaplasty for oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grieco MP, Bertozzi N, Grignaffini E, Raposio E (2018) A three-year experience with medial-pedicle-based breast reduction for different mammary hypertrophy. Acta Biomed 89:389–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clough KB, Baruch J (1992) Plastic surgery and conservative treatment of breast cancer. Indications and results. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 37:682–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Masetti R, Pirullo PG, Mango S, Franceschini G, Chiesa F, Antinori A (2000) Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 7:276–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitoussi AD, Curnier A, Couturaud B, Salmon RJ (2010) Oncoplastic breast surgery: a review and systematic approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1233–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Regnault P (1974) Reduction mammaplasty by the “B” technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 53:19–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aquinati A, Tuttolomondo A, Ruocco G, Riccio M (2019) Improvement of superomedial breast reduction and mastopexy with a new “Hammock” Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2309. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz JCD (2018) New approach to oncoplastic breast conservation: combining autologous volume replacement and the wise-pattern mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6:e1987. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chand ND, Browne V, Paramanathan N, Peiris LJ, Laws SA, Rainsbury RM (2017) Patient-reported outcomes are better after oncoplastic breast conservation than after mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:e1419. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001419

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hau E, Browne L, Capp A et al (2013) The impact of breast cosmetic and functional outcomes on quality of life: long-term results from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Marongiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the author have financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Furthermore, for this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marongiu, F., Bertozzi, N., Sibilio, A. et al. “Bifidus pedicle”, The Use of Bilobed Superomedial Pedicle for Breast Reshaping Following Upper Outer Quadrantectomy: A New Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 866–874 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01982-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01982-x

Keywords

Navigation