Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When Testosterone Needs to be Contrasted: A Preliminary Study of Scar Prevention in Transmen Top Surgery with an Innovative Galenic Preparation

  • Original Article
  • Genital Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transmen are individuals who live a marked incongruence between the assigned gender and the experienced gender. Crucial and life-changing steps in their transition are testosterone treatment and mastectomy to remove the stigma of feminine identity. After surgery, patients’ attention turns to the scars, often not aesthetically pleasant. We thus created an innovative galenic preparation for scar treatment after surgery composed by spironolactone, alfa bisabolol and silicone gel. Functional outcomes, side effects and satisfaction were assessed.

Methods

For the present prospective randomized controlled study, 30 patients with similar demographic characteristics who underwent double incision mastectomy with NA grafts between February 2014 and June 2019 were selected. The treatment Group A (n = 15) was treated for 12 months with “Top Surgery Scar go,” the control Group B (n = 15) with silicon gel. Statistical analysis including Wilcoxon test and Kruskal–Wallis test per variable was performed. To assess satisfaction, a second Wilcoxon test was applied.

Results

The differences between Group A and Group B were statistically significant, especially at T12 with very low p values. Satisfaction was greater in Group A (p value = 3e−4). No major side effects were noticed in Group A.

Conclusions

TSSgo scar innovative treatment showed long-term efficacy in comparison with silicon gel in terms of improved scar tissue texture, pigmentation, pliability and height. It is easy to set up, cost-effective and safe. Further studies are necessary to better assess efficacy and validity of TSSgo, but it appears to be promising as the new treatment of reference for scar management after top surgery in transmen.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lo Russo G, Tanini S, Innocenti M (2017) Masculine chest-wall contouring in FtM transgender: a personal approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(2):369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanini S, Lo Russo G (2018) Shape, position and dimension of the nipple areola complex in the ideal male chest: a quick and simple operating room technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(4):951–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lo Russo G, Tanini S (1310e) Modified nipple flap with free areolar graft for component nipple-areola complex construction: outcomes with a novel technique for chest wall reconstruction in transgender men. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(6):1309e–1310e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eilers RE Jr, Ross EV, Cohen JL, Ortiz AE (2016) A combination approach to surgical scars. Dermatol Surg 42(Suppl 2):S150–S156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khansa I, Harrison B, Janis JE (2016) Evidence-based scar management: how to improve results with technique and technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 138(3 Suppl):165S–S178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ, Bassetto F, Ziegler UE, Meaume S, Téot L (2014) Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(8):1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meseci E, Kayatas S, Api M, Boza A, Cikman MS (2017) Comparison of the effectiveness of topical silicone gel and corticosteroid cream on the pfannenstiel scar prevention - a randomized controlled trial. Ginekol Pol 88(11):591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerwin LY, El Tal AK, Stiff MA, Fakhouri TM (2014) Scar prevention and remodeling: a review of the medical, surgical, topical and light treatment approaches. Int J Dermatol 53(8):922–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baryza MJ, Baryza GA (1995) The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 16(5):535–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Finlay V, Burrows S, Kendell R, Berghuber A, Chong V, Tan J, Edgar DW (2017) Wood F (2017) Modified Vancouver Scar Scale score is linked with quality of life after burn. Burns 43(4):741–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker R, Urso-Baiarda F, Linge C, Grobbelaar A (2009) Cutaneous scarring: a clinical review. Dermatol Res Pract 2009:625376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slemp AE, Kirschner RE (2006) Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management. Curr Opin Pediatr 18(4):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arno AI, Gauglitz GG, Barret JP, Jeschke MG (2014) Up-to-date approach to manage keloids and hypertrophic scars: a useful guide. Burns. 40(7):1255–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gold MH, Berman B, Clementoni MT, Gauglitz GG, Nahai F, Murcia C (2014) Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 1—evaluating the evidence. Dermatol Surg 40(8):817–824

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gold MH, McGuire M, Mustoe TA, Pusic A, Sachdev M, Waibel J, Murcia C (2014) International Advisory Panel on Scar Management. Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2—algorithms for scar prevention and treatment. Dermatol Surg. 40(8):825–831

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meaume S, Le Pillouer-Prost A, Richert B, Roseeuw D, Vadoud J (2014) Management of scars: updated practical guidelines and use of silicones. Eur J Dermatol 24(4):435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gauglitz GG (2013) Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars: current and emerging options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 6:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B (2017) Keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Surg 43:S3–S18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanini S, Fisher AD, Meattini I, Bianchi S, Ristori J, Maggi M, Lo RG (2019) Testosterone and Breast cancer in transmen: case reports, review of the literature, and clinical observation. Clin Breast Cancer 19(2):e271–e275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geschickter CF, Lewis D (1935) Tumors of connective tissue. Am J Cancer 25:630–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Demling RH (2005) The role of anabolic hormones for wound healing in catabolic states. J Burns Wounds 17(4):e2

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kopera D (2015) Impact of testosterone on hair and skin. Endocrinol Metab Synd 4:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schierle HP, Scholz D, Lemperle G (1997) Elevated levels of testosterone receptors in keloid tissue: an experimental investigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):390–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Edriss AS, Mesták J (2005) Management of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 18(4):202–210

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ford LC, King DF, Lagasse LD, Newcomer V (1983) Incresead androgen finding in keloids: a preliminary communication. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 9:545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rey FO, Valterio C, Locatelli L, Ramelet AA, Felber JP (1988) Lack of endocrine systemic side effects after topical application of spironolactone in man. J Endocrinol Invest 11(4):273–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamatou GPP, Viljoen MA (2010) A review of the application and pharmacological properties of α-bisabolol and α-bisabolol-rich oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 87(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mustoe TA (2007) Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(1):82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U (2017) Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res. 58(1–2):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reinke JM, Sorg H (2012) Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res. 49(1):35–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Federica Calabrese (Ph.D. student at Helmholtz center for Environmental research—UFZ—Leipzig) for assistance with statistical analysis and graphics and for giving comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Lo Russo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All participants have given their informed consent in writing.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanini, S., Calabrese, S., Fisher, A.D. et al. When Testosterone Needs to be Contrasted: A Preliminary Study of Scar Prevention in Transmen Top Surgery with an Innovative Galenic Preparation. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 1006–1013 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01678-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01678-2

Keywords

Navigation