Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autologous Breast Reconstruction with SIEA Flaps: An Alternative in Selected Cases

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has been shown to be a reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction. A further refinement in the transfer of lower abdominal tissue is the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap that does not require any incision of the rectus abdominis fascia or muscle and is superior regarding donor-site morbidity.

Objectives

We conducted a retrospective study to assess reliability and outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction using SIEA flaps.

Methods

We performed autologous breast reconstruction in 1708 patients at our department between 2009 and 2018. Of those, 28 patients that underwent breast reconstruction using a SIEA flap were included for a retrospective chart review.

Results

Given an overall flap loss rate of 1.8%, we observed total flap necrosis following a SIEA flap in four patients (13%). All cases were secondary to arterial thrombosis. We further recognized a significant correlation between flap failure and a history of spontaneous deep vein thrombosis (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant relationship between flap failure and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2;p = 0.9) or flap failure and a history of abdominal operations (p = 0.6).

Conclusions

The SIEA flap provides a reasonable option for autologous breast reconstruction with the great advantage of minimal donor-site morbidity. Nevertheless, its use should be preserved to selected cases with favorable anatomy. We therefore recommend proper patient selection based on preoperative computed tomography angiography, intraoperative clinical evaluation and history of hypercoagulable state.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koshima I, Soeda S (1989) Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 42(6):645–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindenblatt N, Gruenherz L, Farhadi J (2019) A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 8(4):389–398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Antia NH, Buch VI (1971) Transfer of an abdominal dermo-fat graft by direct anastomosis of blood vessels. Br J Plast Surg 24(1):15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnez ZM, Khan U, Pogorelec D et al (1999) Rational selection of flaps from the abdomen in breast reconstruction to reduce donor site morbidity. Br J Plast Surg 52(5):351–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rozen WM, Chubb D, Grinsell D et al (2010) The variability of the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and its angiosome: a clinical anatomical study. Microsurgery 30(5):386–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chevray PM (2004) Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(5):1077–1083 discussion 84–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spiegel AJ, Khan FN (2007) An Intraoperative algorithm for use of the SIEA flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1450–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holm C, Mayr M, Hofter E et al (2008) Interindividual variability of the SIEA Angiosome: effects on operative strategies in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1612–1620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Munhoz AM, Pellarin L, Montag E et al (2011) Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) free flap using perforator vessels as a recipient site: clinical implications in autologous breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 202(5):612–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Otte M, Nestle-Kramling C, Fertsch S et al (2016) Conservative mastectomies and Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction: the DIEP flap. Gland Surg 5(1):24–31

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Grinsell DG, McCoubrey GW, Finkemeyer JP (2016) The deep inferior epigastric perforator learning curve in the current era. Ann Plast Surg 76(1):72–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JE, Shenaq DS, Silva AK et al (2016) Breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps: a single-institution experience with 145 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1682–1689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu LC, Bajaj A, Chang DW et al (2008) Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(3):702–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW (2006) Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(3):737–746 discussion 47–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ et al (2007) Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1477–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tessone A, Nava M, Blondeel P et al (2016) Avoiding complications in abdominal wall surgery: a mathematical model to predict the course of the motor innervation of the rectus abdominis. Ann Plast Surg 76(2):227–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Christie B, Shulzhenko NO, Poore SO et al (2019) Divulge the bulge: an international survey of abdominal donor site morbidity in free autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 53:265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moradi P, Durrant C, Glass GE (2011) SIEA flap leads to an increase in abdominal seroma rates compared to DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 34:87–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES et al (2006) Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(6):571–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coroneos CJ, Heller AM, Voineskos SH et al (2015) SIEA versus DIEP arterial complications: a cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(5):802e–807e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor GI, Daniel RK (1975) The anatomy of several free flap donor sites. Plast Reconstr Surg 56(3):243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolfram D, Schoeller T, Hussl H et al (2006) The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap: indications for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):593–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ulusal BG, Cheng MH, Wei FC et al (2006) Breast reconstruction using the entire transverse abdominal adipocutaneous flap based on unilateral superficial or deep inferior epigastric vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(5):1395–1403 discussion 404–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buchel EW, Dalke KR, Hayakawa TE (2013) Rethinking the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in breast reconstruction: video demonstration of a rapid, reliable harvest technique. Can J Plast Surg 21(2):99–100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Andree C, Munder BI, Behrendt P et al (2008) Improved safety of autologous breast reconstruction surgery by stabilisation of microsurgical vessel anastomoses using fibrin sealant in 349 free DIEP or fascia-muscle-sparing (fms)-TRAM flaps: a two-centre study. Breast 17(5):492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L et al (2006) A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: the @RISTOS project. Ann Surg 243(1):89–95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pannucci CJ, Chang EY, Wilkins EG (2009) Venous thromboembolic disease in autogenous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 63(1):34–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Arnez ZM, Bajec J, Bardsley AF et al (1991) Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 87(3):470–478 discussion 9–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K et al (2004) Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center’s experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(1):83–89 discussion 90–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Modarressi A, Schettini AV, Ruegg EM et al (2018) Venous thromboembolism events after breast reconstructions with DIEP free flaps in 192 consecutive case. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 63(1):11–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Effects of obesity on postoperative complications after breast reconstruction using free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, deep inferior epigastric perforator, and superficial inferior epigastric artery flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 76(5):576–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Andree C, Langer S, Seidenstuecker K et al (2013) A single center prospective study of bilateral breast reconstruction with free abdominal flaps: a critical analyses of 144 patients. Med Sci Monit 19:467–474

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL et al (2011) Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1086–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Wolter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

All patients gave written consent for retrospective chart review and anonymous use of their photographs upon admission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lisanne Grünherz and Andreas Wolter shared first authorship.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 241154 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grünherz, L., Wolter, A., Andree, C. et al. Autologous Breast Reconstruction with SIEA Flaps: An Alternative in Selected Cases. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 299–306 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01554-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01554-8

Keywords

Navigation