Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facial Contouring Surgery with Custom Silicone Implants Based on a 3D Prototype Model and CT-Scan: A Preliminary Study

  • Original Article
  • Craniofacial/Maxillofacial
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

From perspectives of differences in anatomic and cultural characteristics from Caucasians, Asians have been considered to undergo facial bone contouring surgery of the zygoma and mandible and fat grafting in the anterior mimetic area of midface. We have sought to develop more ready-to-use methods for increasing the applicability of custom facial implants in the field of esthetic surgery.

Patients and Methods

We performed insertion of custom silicone implants after taking a clinical history and photographs in a total of seven patients (n = 7) between March 2008 and July 2014. Our clinical series of patients comprises two men and five women, whose mean age was 41.6 ± 21.6-years old (range 23–82 years). In addition, the patients were followed up during a mean period of 11.43 ± 6.68 months (range 3–24 months). In the current study, we evaluated treatment outcomes of custom silicone implants using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in facial contouring surgery by reviewing seven cases.

Results

There were no abnormalities of the soft tissue or bone due to the use of custom silicone implants. Moreover, we found that custom silicone implants were advantageous in predicting treatment outcomes. All the patients were satisfied with treatment outcomes.

Conclusion

Custom silicone implants based on the PVA clay on the 3D RP model will play a prominent role in facial contouring surgery but its full potential deserves further studies.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wimalawansa S, McKnight A, Bullocks JM (2009) Socioeconomic impact of ethnic cosmetic surgery: trends and potential financial impact the african american, asian american, latin american, and middle eastern communities have on cosmetic surgery. Semin Plast Surg 23(3):159–162

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldsmith D, Horowitz A, Orentlicher G (2012) Facial skeletal augmentation using custom facial implants. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 20(1):119–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU et al (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(4):335–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGurk M, Amis AA, Potamianos P, Goodger NM (1997) Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79(3):169–174

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Terino EO, Edwards MC (2008) Customizing jawlines: the art of alloplastic premandible contouring. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 16(1):99–122 vi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin H, Kim BG (2004) Mandibular angle reduction versus mandible reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(5):1263–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baek SM, Kim SS, Bindiger A (1989) The prominent mandibular angle: preoperative management, operative technique, and results in 42 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 83(2):272–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Castro C, Jacobs R (2014) Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images. Imaging Sci Dent 44(2):121–128

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG (2008) Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134(4):573–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24(6):1679–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Han K, Kang J (1996) A custom-made nasal implant: prefabrication from curing of silicone adhesive. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(2):436–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yaremchuk MJ, Doumit G, Thomas MA (2011) Alloplastic augmentation of the facial skeleton: an occasional adjunct or alternative to orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):2021–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers GF, Greene AK (2012) Autogenous bone graft: basic science and clinical implications. J Craniofac Surg 23(1):323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Kyu Kim.

Additional information

Hyung Woo Yim and Anh Nguyen have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yim, H.W., Nguyen, A. & Kim, Y.K. Facial Contouring Surgery with Custom Silicone Implants Based on a 3D Prototype Model and CT-Scan: A Preliminary Study. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 418–424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0482-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0482-z

Keywords

Navigation