Abstract
Background
The changes in the periorbital region are among the most prominent features of the aging process in the lower eyelids. Intense focused ultrasound (IFUS), known as the Ulthera System, was designed to correct this process. The current study assessed the safety and efficacy of the Ulthera System.
Methods
This study enrolled seven adult patients who presented from March 2011 to May 2012 for correction of lower eyelid aging by Ulthera. The subjects were treated using Ulthera 1.5 and 3.0 mm probes. The 1.5 mm probe is used to tighten of loose eyelid skin and the deep dermis, whereas the 3.0 mm probe is used to tighten the orbicularis oculi muscle and the orbital septum. The patients were evaluated for allergic reactions and other side effects. The subjects’ satisfaction with clinical photographs and the degree of pain were evaluated. Moreover, orbital computed tomography (CT) and ophthalmologic examinations were performed. The study used CT both as a research tool and as a clinical score system for evaluating aging lower eyelids and performed statistical analysis.
Results
Based on the CT images, the difference between the pre- and postoperative distances from the baseline (line between the most inferior point of the supraorbital rim and the most superior point of the infraorbital rim) to the most protruding point of the orbital septum was 0.51 ± 0.23 for the right eye (p < 0.001) and 0.54 ± 0.17 for the left eye (p < 0.001). The subjective score for patient satisfaction was 3.85 ± 0.69. The objective satisfaction scores reported by two blinded researchers were respectively 3.45 ± 1.69 and 3.25 ± 1.43. During the study period, no adverse events and no suspected serious adverse reactions were noted.
Conclusions
Tightening of infraorbital laxity and skin can be achieved using the Ulthera System. Patients showed a minimal pain level during treatment, and topical analgesic cream was able to manage pain during the procedure.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dierickx CC (2006) The role of deep heating for noninvasive skin rejuvenation. Lasers Surg Med 38:799–807
Kim KH, Geronemus RG (2004) Nonablative laser and light therapies for skin rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:398–409
Michaels BM, Csank GA, Ryb GE, Eko FN, Rubin A (2012) Prospective randomized comparison of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) in the treatment of forehead, glabellar, and periorbital wrinkles. Aesthet Surg J 32:96–102
Jolesz FA (2009) MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Annu Rev Med 60:417–430
Jolesz FA, Hynynen K, McDannold N, Tempany C (2005) MR imaging-controlled focused ultrasound ablation: a noninvasive image-guided surgery. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 13:545–560
Suh DH, Shin MK, Lee SJ et al (2011) Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg 37:1595–1602
Brobst RW, Ferguson M, Perkins SW (2012) Ulthera: Initial and six-month results. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 20:163–176
White WM, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Gliklich RE (2007) Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: a new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:22–29
Alster TS, Tanzi EL (2012) Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg 38:754–759
Laubach HJ, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Manstein D (2008) Intense focused ultrasound: evaluation of a new treatment modality for precise microcoagulation within the skin. Dermatol Surg 34:727–734
Lee HS, Jang WS, Cha YJ et al (2012) Multiple pass ultrasound tightening of skin laxity of the lower face and neck. Dermatol Surg 38:20–27
Suh DH, Oh YJ, Lee SJ et al (2012) A intense-focused ultrasound tightening for the treatment of infraorbital laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther 14:290–295
Gliklich RE, White WM, Slayton MH, Barthe PG, Makin IR (2007) Clinical pilot study of intense ultrasound therapy to deep dermal facial skin and subcutaneous tissues. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:88–95
Tierney EP, Hanke CW, Watkins L (2011) Treatment of lower eyelid rhytids and laxity with ablative fractionated carbon-dioxide laser resurfacing: case series and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 64:730–740
Bonan P, Campolmi P, Cannarozzo G et al (2012) Eyelid skin tightening: a novel “Niche” for fractional CO(2) rejuvenation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26:186–193
de la Plaza R, Arroyo JM (1988) A new technique for the treatment of palpebral bags. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:677–687
Mendelson BC (1993) Herniated fat and the orbital septum of the lower lid. Clin Plast Surg 20:323–330
Lee Y, Hwang K (2002) Skin thickness of Korean adults. Surg Radiol Anat 24:183–189
Chan NP, Shek SY, Yu CS et al (2011) Safety study of transcutaneous focused ultrasound for noninvasive skin tightening in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 43:366–375
Chen YS, Tsai TH, Wu ML, Chang KC, Lin TW (2008) Evaluation of age-related intraorbital fat herniation through computed tomography. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1191–1198
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A100054).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pak, C.S., Lee, Y.K., Jeong, J.H. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Ulthera in the Rejuvenation of Aging Lower Eyelids: A Pivotal Clinical Trial. Aesth Plast Surg 38, 861–868 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0383-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0383-6