Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does Reduction Mammaplasty Revert Skeletal Disturbances in the Vertebral Column of Patients With Macromastia? A Preliminary Study

  • Original Article
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Enlarged breasts are associated with many physical and psychological symptoms. It is important to use objective criteria in documenting physical changes of a patient’s body due to enlarged breasts and the benefits of surgery. This preliminary study aimed to determine whether the reduction mammaplasty procedure changes the angles of cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis.

Methods

The study population consisted of 22 patients who underwent breast reduction surgery. All the patients had lateral cervicothoracolumbar radiographs taken preoperatively and at least 2 months postoperatively. Cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis angles, as well as sagittal balance, were examined. The body mass index (BMI), breast tissue volume, and excised tissue amount of each patient were recorded.

Results

All the patients had increased cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis angles preoperatively, and the angles were significantly decreased postoperatively. Of the 22 patients, 7 had decreased and 8 had increased lumbar lordosis angles. All the lordosis angles showed significant improvement at the last examination. Seven patients had disturbed sagittal balance preoperatively, and all had normal sagittal balance postoperatively. Preoperative total breast tissue volume was positively correlated with the differences in cervical lordosis angles, BMI, preoperative cervical lordosis angles, and cervical lordosis angles.

Conclusion

Hypertrophic breasts are not only a cosmetic but also a functional problem complicated by pathologic conditions in the vertebral column such as increased cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and increased or decreased lumbar lordosis. Breast reduction may improve these pathologic angles. Reducing the nonphysiologic weight of enlarged breasts located anterior to the main axis of the body may correct pathologic angulation and disturbed sagittal balance of the vertebral column.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atterhem H, Holmner S, Janson PE (1998) Reduction mammaplasty: symptoms, complications, and late results: a retrospective study on 242 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32:281–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benditte-Klepetko H, Leisser V, Paternostro-Sluga T, Rakos M, Trattnig S, Helbich T, Schemper M, Deutinger M (2007) Hypertrophy of the breast: a problem of beauty or health? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 16:1062–1069. doi:10.1089/jwh.2006.0183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JR, Holton LH III, Chung TL, Slezak S (2008) Breast-feeding, self-exam, and exercise practices before and after reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 61:375–379. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318160223f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chao JD, Memmel HC, Redding JF, Egan L, Odom LC, Casas LA (2002) Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: a prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1644–1652. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000033029.01084.57 discussion 1653–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ducic I, Iorio ML, Al-Attar A (2010) Chronic headaches/migraines: extending indications for breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:44–49. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a63f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Findikcioglu K, Findikcioglu F, Bulam H, Sezgin B, Ozmen S (2012) The impact of breast reduction surgery on the vertebral column. Ann Plast Surg 70:639–642. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823fac41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Findikcioglu K, Findikcioglu F, Ozmen S, Guclu T (2007) The impact of breast size on the vertebral column: a radiologic study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:23–27. doi:10.1007/s00266-006-0178-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC Jr (1980) Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 134:979–983. doi:10.2214/ajr.134.5.979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foreman KB, Dibble LE, Droge J, Carson R, Rockwell WB (2009) The impact of breast reduction surgery on low back compressive forces and function in individuals with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1393–1399. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b988aa

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilleard W, Smith T (2007) Effect of obesity on posture and hip joint moments during a standing task, and trunk forward flexion motion. Int J Obes Lond 31:267–271. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple–areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez F, Walton RL, Shafer B, Matory WE Jr, Borah GL (1993) Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:1270–1276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:851–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toros H (2002) Postmenopozal osteoporozlu kadınlarda dorsal kifoz açısının ve fonksiyonel durumun değerlendirilmesi., in FTR ABD İ.Ü. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi

  16. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Holland B (1996) Comparisons of lordotic cervical spine curvatures to a theoretical ideal model of the static sagittal cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:667–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E235–E242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Hur CY, Song HR, Park JH (2010) Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods. Eur Spine J 19:1551–1557. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1422-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hooper DM, Ricciardelli EJ, Goel VK, Aleksiev A (1997) Biomechanical changes in the low back following reduction mammaplasty surgery. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 12:525–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iwuagwu OC, Bajalan AA, Platt AJ, Stanley PR, Drew PJ (2005) Effects of reduction mammoplasty on upper limb nerve conduction across the thoracic outlet in women with macromastia: a prospective randomized study. Ann Plast Surg 55:445–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaye BL (1972) Neurologic changes with excessively large breasts. South Med J 65:177–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koltz PF, Sbitany H, Myers RP, Shaw RB, Patel N, Girotto JA (2011) Reduction mammaplasty in the adolescent female: the URMC experience. Int J Surg 9:229–232. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuntz C IV, Levin LS, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI, Morgan CJ (2007) Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 6:104–112. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.2.104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Latham K, Brehm W, Sharon DJ (2011) Comparing fitness performance before and after breast reduction surgery. Mil Med 176:1351–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Letterman G, Schurter M (1980) The effects of mammary hypertrophy on the skeletal system. Ann Plast Surg 5:425–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malfair D, Flemming AK, Dvorak MF, Munk PL, Vertinsky AT, Heran MK, Graeb DA (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:S8–S22. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.7145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Ronza SD, Iodice P, Saggini R, Scuderi N (2012) A study of postural changes after breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1311–1319. doi:10.1007/s00266-012-9968-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison DE, Holland B (2005) Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28:187–193. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller AP, Zacher JB, Berggren RB, Falcone RE, Monk J (1995) Breast reduction for symptomatic macromastia: can objective predictors for operative success be identified? Plast Reconstr Surg 95:77–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen JT, Wheatley MJ, Schnur PL, Nguyen TA, Winn SR (2008) Reduction mammaplasty: a review of managed care medical policy coverage criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1092–1100. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000304238.43482.9c

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Polly DW Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, Asplund LM, Mulligan M, Chang AS (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1530–1535 discussion 1535–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogliani M, Gentile P, Labardi L, Donfrancesco A, Cervelli V (2009) Improvement of physical and psychological symptoms after breast reduction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1647–1649. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Romero-Vargas S, Zarate-Kalfopulos B, Otero-Camara E, Rosales-Olivarez L, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Morales-Hernandez E, Reyes-Sanchez A (2012) The impact of body mass index and central obesity on the spino-pelvic parameters: a correlation study. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2560-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):578–585. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1924-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarwer DB, Whitaker LA, Pertschuk MJ, Wadden TA (1998) Body image concerns of reconstructive surgery patients: an underrecognized problem. Ann Plast Surg 40:403–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schnur PL, Schnur DP, Petty PM, Hanson TJ, Weaver AL (1997) Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:875–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seitchik MW (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: criteria for insurance coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:1029–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith JT, Masters KS, Yandow S (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 23:551–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ulmar B, Guhring M, Schmalzle T, Weise K, Badke A, Brunner A (2010) Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Cobb angle in the measurement of vertebral, local, and segmental kyphosis of traumatic lumbar spine fractures in the lateral x-ray. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1533–1538. doi:10.1007/s00402-010-1104-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wagner DS, Alfonso DR (2005) The influence of obesity and volume of resection on success in reduction mammaplasty: an outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1034–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitcome KK, Shapiro LJ, Lieberman DE (2007) Fetal load and the evolution of lumbar lordosis in bipedal hominins. Nature 450:1075–1078. doi:10.1038/nature06342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mehmet Kocak, MD, from the Department of Radiology for his support in collecting the X-ray data.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Furkan Erol Karabekmez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karabekmez, F.E., Gokkaya, A., Isik, C. et al. Does Reduction Mammaplasty Revert Skeletal Disturbances in the Vertebral Column of Patients With Macromastia? A Preliminary Study. Aesth Plast Surg 38, 104–112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0194-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0194-1

Keywords

Navigation