Skip to main content
Log in

Skoog Rhinoplasty Revisited

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Le nez de Cléopâtre, s’il eût été plus court,

Toute la face de la terre aurait change.

Blaise Pascal: Pensées (1669)

Abstract

Background

Accurate restoration of the smooth nasal bridge contour may be difficult to achieve after removal of the hump during reduction rhinoplasty. In patients with thin skin, a projecting septum or sharp bone edges can spoil an otherwise excellent result. To prevent dorsal irregularities from arising and to preserve the nasal roof, the technique of autografting the reduced nasal dorsum was introduced by Cottle and Skoog. This technique was popular for a few decades but then was rarely used. Experiences with the Skoog rhinoplasty method are presented and its use in suitable cases discussed.

Methods

Since 1997, 44 patients (29 females and 15 males) have undergone surgery by the author with reinsertion of the reduced hump during rhinoplasty. Of the 44 patients, 27 (61%) were of Middle Eastern descent. All operations were performed with the patient under dissociative and local anesthesia.

Results

Providing the autograft had an adequate size, a smooth dorsal bridge was obtained in nearly 100% of the cases. In patients with severely deviated noses, the straightened reinserted hump hid residual bending of the septum. Smaller grafts carried a risk of visible edges and an imbalance between the width of the lower third of the nose and the radix after healing. Currently, only moderate technical improvements compared with the original technique are used.

Conclusion

The Skoog method of rhinoplasty is worth including in the operative repertoire and can be useful in suitable cases. It also is a good rescue technique if too much of the nasal dorsum has been inadvertently removed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owsley TG, Taylor CO (1994) The use of Gore-Tex for nasal augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:241–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cottle MH (1954) Nasal roof repair and hump removal. Arch Otolaryngol 60:408–412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skoog T (1966) A method of hump reduction in rhinoplasty: a technique for preservation of the nasal roof. Arch Otolaryngol 83:283–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skoog T (1974) Chapter X. The large nose. A method of correction. In: Plastic surgery: new methods. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, pp 225–249

  5. Regnault P, Alfaro A (1980) The Skoog rhinoplasty: a modified technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:578–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lejour M, Duchateau J, Potaznik A (1986) Routine reinsertion of the hump in rhinoplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 20:55–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Niechajev I, Haraldsson PO (1997) Ethnic profile of patients seeking rhinoplasty in Stockholm. Aesthet Plast Surg 21:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Niechajev I, Haraldsson PO (1996) Two methods of anaesthesia for rhinoplasty in outpatient setting. Aesthet Plast Surg 20:159–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jost G (1988) Atlas de Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique, 2nd edn. Masson, Paris, pp 28–29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hall JA, Peters MD, Hilger PA (2004) Modification of the Skoog dorsal reduction for preservation of the middle nasal vault. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:108–110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Niechajev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niechajev, I. Skoog Rhinoplasty Revisited. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 808–813 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9692-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9692-1

Keywords

Navigation