Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurements of Breasts of Young West African Females: A Guideline in Anatomical Landmarks for Adolescent Breast Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There have been few studies to develop standardized methods of measuring female breasts’ shapes in clinical settings in West Africa. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical variation in breast measurements among a large group of adolescent female subjects, with the goal of providing guideline metrics to surgeons performing reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy on patients desiring a more adolescent shape and nipple position.

Methods

Standard measurement parameters of both breasts were measured and recorded. Subjects were female students from six selected junior high schools (JHS) at Sogakope, Ghana. Demographic and statistical data were recorded and analyzed with Epi Info™ 2000.

Results

A total of 438 subjects, aged 16–22 years (mean = 17.43 years) were surveyed. The average distance from the suprasternal notch to the left and right breast nipples was 20.97 and 20.31 cm, respectively. The average distance from the left and right nipples to their inframammary crease was 9.36 and 9.21 cm, respectively. The average distance from the midline in the xiphoid area to the left and right nipples was 10.94 and 10.84 cm, respectively. The average asymmetrical difference in length along the vertical midline between left and right breasts for 53.4% (234) of the total subjects (438) was 1.32 cm; no differences were recorded for the remaining 204 subjects.

Conclusion

The “normal values” for adolescent youthful breasts differ slightly from previous reports on desired adult breast outcomes. It is hoped that these values would serve as a baseline in aesthetic breast surgeries, especially in reduction mammaplasty in young females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agbenorku P (2001) Breast developmental anomalies. Protocol for investigation and surgical treatments. In: 41st Annual Scientific Conference on the West Africa College of Surgeons (WACS), Nouakchott, Mauritania, pp 28–30 [abstract]

  2. Agbenorku P, Addai Mensa L, Boagye G (1998) Juvenile macromastia. Subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. A case report. In: Proceedings XXXIst World Congress of the International College of Surgeons, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp 299–306

  3. Agbenorku P, Agbenorku M, Iddi A, Amevor E, Sepenu R, Osei D, Kyei I (2010) Incidence of breast developmental anomalies: a study at Sogakope, Ghana. Nig J Plast Surg 6(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bostwick J (1990) Breast augmentation, reduction and mastopexy. In: Jurkiewicz MJ, Krizek TJ, Mathes SJ, Ariyan S (eds) Plastic surgery principles and practice. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1063–1094

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breuning KH, Colwell A (2007) Inferolateral Alloderm Hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 59:250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dilek KA, Ahmet CA, Erol B, Hüsamettin T, Oguz T (2010) Anthropometric breast measurement: a study of 385 Turkish female students. Aesthet Surg J 30(1):44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM (2006) Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56:22–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall JG, Allanson J, Gripp K, Slavotinek A (2003) Handbook of physical measurements, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 302

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond DC (2009) Atlas of aesthetic breast surgery, 1st edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 27–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Handel N (2006) Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:152–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hidalgo DA (2007) Y-scar vertical mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7):1749–1754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson IT, Bayramicli M, Gupta M, Yavuzer R (1999) Importance of the pedicle length measurement in reduction mammoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Surg 104(2):398–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan UD (2007) Vertical scar with the bipedicle technique: a modified procedure for breast reduction and mastopexy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(4):337–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loustadt HD, Mayer HF, Sarrabayouse M (2008) The Owl technique combined with the inferior pedicle in mastopexy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(1):11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowery JC (1996) Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg 36(6):601–606 discussion 607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maliniac JW (1934) Sculpture in the living. Lancet Press, New York, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maliniac JW (1950) Breast deformities and their repair. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  18. Penn J (1955) Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 7(4):357–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin JP, Khachi G (2008) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: dermal suspension and selective auto-augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 35:123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ShaikhNaidu N (2004) Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52:465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith JW, Gillen FJ (1980) Repairing errors of nipple-areola placement following reduction mammoplasty. J Aesthet Plast Surg 4:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith DJ, Palin WE, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(3):331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spear SL, Boehmler JH 4th, Clemens MW (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon’s practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7):136–141

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tebbets JB (2005) Augmentation mammoplasty; tissue assessment and planning. In: Spear S, Willey SC, Robb GL, Hammond DC (eds) Surgery of the breast, principle and art, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1261–1326

    Google Scholar 

  25. Westreich M (2008) Anthropomorphic measurement of the breast. In: Shiffman MA (ed) Breast augmentation: principles and practices. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wexler MR, Yeschua R, Neuman Z (1977) The McKissock breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the South Tongu District Education Directorate and the South Tongu District Health Directorate of the Volta Region, Ghana, for permitting us to conduct this study in the district. We also thank the participatory JHS authorities and female students who agreed to be volunteers for the study. We are also grateful to the parents for their willingness and readiness to allow their wards to be part of the study. We sincerely thank Dr. Richard Hopper for reading through the manuscript and making valuable recommendations.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pius Agbenorku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agbenorku, P., Agbenorku, M., Iddi, A. et al. Measurements of Breasts of Young West African Females: A Guideline in Anatomical Landmarks for Adolescent Breast Surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 49–54 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9555-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9555-1

Keywords

Navigation