Abstract
Fat grafts are commonly used in plastic surgery, but their unpredictable absorption rates are a considerable disadvantage. Furthermore, no agreement has been reached regarding the method that best enables fat graft survival. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different preparation methods on fat graft viability. Fat tissue was harvested from the remnants of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps by syringe aspiration. Harvested fat tissue was prepared using three different methods: centrifugation, metal sieve concentration, and cotton gauze concentration. To evaluate the viabilities of fat cells, XTT assays were performed. For the study, 18 nude mice were allocated to three groups: the centrifugation, metal sieve, and cotton gauze groups (6 mice per group). Prepared fat (1 ml) was injected into the nuchal area of the mice, and 12 weeks later, grafts were dissected to determine graft survival rates and subjected to histologic analysis. No significant differences were observed in graft survival rates and histologic findings (necrosis and vascularity) between the three groups. However, histologic analysis found the metal sieve group to have significantly lower fat cell viability and more inflammation than the other two groups. The findings suggest that the closed centrifugation technique has no advantage over the open cotton gauze technique in terms of fat graft viability, and that the metal sieve concentration method is deficient as a preparation method because it can cause grafted fat degradation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carpaneda CA (1996) Study of aspirated adipose tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:399–402
Coleman SR (2006) Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg 18:108S–120S
Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, Goltz RW, Graham GF, Hordinsky MK, Lewis CW, Pariser DM, Whitaker DC, Butler B, Lowery BJ (1996) Guidelines of care for soft tissue augmentation: fat transplantation. J Am Acad Dermatol 34:690–694
Hambley RM, Carruthers JA (1992) Microlipoinjection for the elevation of depressed full-thickness skin grafts on the nose. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:963–968
Jackson IT, Simman R, Tholen R, DiNick VD (2001) A successful long-term method of fat grafting: recontouring of a large subcutaneous postradiation thigh defect with autologous fat transplantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:165–169
Kononas TC, Bucky LP, Hurley C, May JW Jr (1993) The fate of suctioned and surgically removed fat after reimplantation for soft-tissue augmentation: a volumetric and histologic study in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:763–768
Pereria LH, Radwanski HN (1996) Fat grafting on the buttocks and lower limbs. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:409–416
Pinski KS, Roengik HH Jr (1992) Autologous fat transplantation: long-term follow-up. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:179–184
Ramon Y, Shoshani O, Peled IJ, Gilhar A, Carmi N, Fodor L, Risin Y, Ullmann Y (2005) Enhancing the take of injected adipose tissue by a simple method for concentrating fat cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:197–201
Rigotti G, Marchi A, Galie M, Baroni G, Benati D, Krampera M, Pasini A, Sbarbati A (2007) Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirates transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1409–1422
Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA (2004) In search of improved fat transfer viability: a quantitative analysis of the role of centrifugation and harvest site. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:391–395
Sattler G, Sommer B (1997) Liporecycling: immediate and delayed. Am J Cosmet Surg 14:311–316
Scudiero DA, Shoemaker RH, Paull KD, Monks A, Tierney S, Nofziger TH, Currens MJ, Seniff D, Boyd MR (1988) Evaluation of a soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth and drug sensitivity in culture using human and other tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 48:4827–4833
Smith P, Adams WP Jr, Lipschitz AH, Chau B, Sorokin E, Rohrich RJ, Brown SA (2006) Autologous human fat grafting: effect of harvesting and preparation techniques on adipocyte graft survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1836–1844
Sommer B, Sattler G (2000) Current concepts of fat graft survival: histology of aspirated adipose tissue and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 26:1159–1166
Suga H, Matsumoto D, Inoue K, Shigeura T, Eto H, Aoi N, Kato H, Abe H, Yoshimura K (2008) Numerical measurement of viable and nonviable adipocytes and other cellular components in aspirated fat tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:103–113
Xie Y, Zheng D, Li Q, Chen Y, Lei H, Pu LL (2010) The effect of centrifugation on viability of fat grafts: an evaluation with the glucose transport test. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:482–487
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minn, KW., Min, KH., Chang, H. et al. Effects of Fat Preparation Methods on the Viabilities of Autologous Fat Grafts. Aesth Plast Surg 34, 626–631 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9525-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9525-7