Abstract
Background
Roughly 90% of breast augmentations are done through the submammary approach, yet patients, given the choice, sometimes choose the transaxillary approach, with the inconspicuous scar hidden in the axilla. Because the transaxillary approach is technically demanding and is performed relatively rarely, many plastic surgeons never master the technique.
Methods
From 1988 to 2009, 140 patients underwent transaxillary breast augmentation by the author, who developed several innovations and improvements for planning of this operation, its technical execution, and postoperative care. Among these innovations are a new implant selection system, the “boomerang incision,” the technique for inserting anatomic teardrop-shaped implants through the axilla, submuscular and subfascial implant placement, a new instrument called the breast implant pusher, and use of intermittent regional postoperative analgesia.
Results
Implementation of the aforementioned modifications and innovations improved the overall quality and consistency of surgical results. It was proved that anatomically shaped breast implants could be inserted through the axillary incision and correctly positioned in the subfascial and submuscular location. The transaxillary technique is contraindicated for patients with ptotic, asymmetric, or tubular breasts.
Conclusion
Transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty without routine endoscopic assistance is a safe method with predictable results and a high rate of patient satisfaction. The transaxillary technique offers the advantage of locating the surgical scar off the breast. It requires closer supervision during the first few postoperative months compared with the submammary or periareolar technique because it is more difficult to place and maintain implants at the proper level using the transaxillary approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cronin TD, Gerow F (1964) Augmentation mammaplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Transactions of the third international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 41–49
Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation. The axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:273–276
Troques R (1972) Implantation des prostheses mammaires par incision axillaire. Nouv Presse Med 1:2409–2410
Graf RM, Bernardes A, Auerswald A, Damasio RCC (2000) Subfascial endoscopic transaxillary augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24:216–220
Ho LCY (1993) Endoscopic assisted transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 46:332–336
Price CI, Eaves FF, Nahai F, Jones G, Bostwick J (1994) Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:612–619
Tebbetts JB (1988) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a 9-year experience. Clin Plast Surg 15:557–568
Tebbets JB (2006) Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl 7S):53S–80S
Giordano PA, Roulf M, Laurent B, Mateu J (2007) Endoscopic transaxillary breast augmentation: clinical evaluation of a series of 306 patients over a 9-year period. Aesthet Surg J 27:47–54
Heitmann C, Schrekenberger C, Olbrisch RR (1998) A silicone implant filled with cohesive gel: advantages and disadvantages. Eur J Plast Surg 21:329–332
Niechajev I (2001) Mammary augmentation by cohesive silicone gel implants with anatomic shape—technical considerations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:397–403
Niechajev I (2003) Innovative augmentation: body language. Plast Cosmet Surg 11:16–18
Maldick RA (1993) “No touch” submuscular saline breast augmentation technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 17:183–192
Hvilsom GB, Henriksen TF, Hölmich LR, Friis S (2008) Komplikationer efter bystaugmentation—Resultat fra dansk plastikkirurgisk mammaregister. In: Proceedings of XXXIInd congress of the Scandinavian Association of Plastic Surgeons, Aarhus, Denmark, p 54 [in Danish]
Benito-Ruiz J (2004) Subfascial breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1088–1092
Momeni A, Padron NT, Föhn M, Bannasch H, Borges J, Ryu SM, Stark B (2005) Safety, complications and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:558–564
Munhoz AM, Fells E, Arruda E, Montag E, Okada A, Aldrighi C, Aldrighi J, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC (2006) Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:503–512
Niechajev I, Jurell G, Lohjelm L (2007) Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:697–710
Prado A, Andrades P, Leniz P (2007) Implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability of breast cancer development and sentinel node mapping interference. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:317–319
Shons AR (2002) Breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: the preoperative consultation (editorial). Plast Reconstr Surg 109:383–385
Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Buschpiegel C, Ono C, Montag E, Fells E, Arruda E, Sturtz G, Kovac P, Filassi JR, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC (2005) The feasibility of sentinel lymph node detection in patients with previous transaxillary implant breast augmentation: preliminary results. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:163–168
Graf RM, Canan LW, Romano GG, Tolazzi ARD, Cruz GAO (2007) Implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability of breast cancer development and sentinel node mapping interference. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:322–324
Munhoz AM, Ferreira MC (2007) Implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability of breast cancer development and sentinel node mapping interference. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:320–321
Conflict of interest statement
The author has no financial interest in any of the medical companies mentioned in this article. He has lectured in several courses and symposia organized by Eurosilicone Ltd. and has received lecturer fees. He has no stocks and holds no appointed position with any medical firm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niechajev, I. Improvements in Transaxillary Breast Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 34, 322–329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9437-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9437-6