Abstract
Background
This article provides an algorithm for achieving an aesthetically pleasing nipple–areola complex in cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction
Methods
If the contralateral nipple was big enough and the nipple-sharing technique could be used in the future for reconstruction, we left a round skin paddle at the time of the skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate flap reconstruction. The diameter of the round skin paddle was approximately the same as the contralateral areola. For nipple reconstruction we placed the graft from the contralateral nipple in the middle of the aforementioned skin paddle. If the contralateral nipple was not sufficiently large for use as a donor, then the C-V flap was used for nipple reconstruction. In these cases we deliberately left an oval skin paddle when the skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate flap reconstruction were performed. The short diameter of the oval skin paddle was approximately the same as the diameter of the contralateral areola. The position and the height of the C-V flap were marked in order to transform the oval skin paddle to a round one when the donor site of the C-V flap was closed.
Results
Following this algorithm an optical illusion of a nipple–areola complex that is similar to the contralateral normal one is created.
Conclusion
From our experience this algorithm can help create an aesthetically pleasing nipple–areola complex and also provides a ready pattern to our tattoing experts for the dermatography of the nipple–areola complex.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anton M, Eskenazi LB, Hartrampf CR (1991) Nipple reconstruction with local flaps: star and wrap flaps. Perspect Plast Surg 5:67–68
Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick JIII (2001) Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:361–369
Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, Houlihan MJ, Koufman CN, Morris DJ, Troyan SL, Goldwyn RM (1998) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:49–62
Bistoni G, Rulli A, Izzo L, Noya G, Alfano C, Barberini F (2006) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 25:495–497
Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI (2006) Update on the indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Support Oncol 4:225–230
Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Müller H, Küchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 238:120–127
Hudson DA, Dent DM, Lazarus D (2000) One-stage immediate breast and nipple-areolar reconstruction with autologous tissue I: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 45:471–476
Hudson DA, Skoll PJ (2001) Single-stage, autologous breast restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1163-1171 (discussion 1172-1173)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spyropoulou, G.A., Sterne, G.D. Algorithm for an Aesthetically Pleasing Nipple–Areola Complex with the Use of the C-V Flap in Cases of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg 33, 240–242 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9231-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9231-x