Abstract
Background
The amount of lift achievable in the temple region has been limited by traditional uniplanar dissection techniques. A biplanar temple-lifting technique (BTL), involving a biplanar dissection both deep and superficial to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) of the temporal region, is described. This study compares the amount of temporal lifting that can be achieved using a uniplanar dissection with that achieved using a biplanar dissection.
Methods
Thirty-seven patients underwent bilateral temple lifting. Deep dissection was performed on the surface of the deep temporalis fascia. The skin flap was pulled in a superolateral direction and the skin overlap at the wound edge was measured. A SMAS flap was then dissected beneath the dermis from the anterior wound edge to the temporal hairline. The SMAS flap was suspended superolaterally and fixated to the deep temporalis fascia. The skin flap was again pulled in a superolateral direction and the amount of skin overlap was measured and compared.
Results
The average potential temple skin that could be excised using the traditional dissection technique was 15.1 mm (range, 7–24 mm). The average temple skin that was excised using the biplanar dissection technique was 21.8 mm (range, 14–30 mm). The biplanar technique was shown to offer, on average, a 48% increase in lift relative to the skin-only approach. There were no cases of wound dehiscence, necrosis, or overcorrection.
Conclusion
Using the BTL technique to create a temporal SMAS flap, dissected free from overlying dermis as well as from deep temporal fascia, provides a more secure suspension of the temporal flap and significantly greater temple lift than a uniplanar dissection. The deep layering absorbs the tension of the lift, allowing for tensionless skin closure, thus decreasing the potential for scarring, hair loss, and necrosis. The increased mobility and higher suspension of the temporal flap allows for more skin excision and therefore a more pleasing lateral brow height.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Knize DM (1996) An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(7):1321–1333
Byrd HS, Andochick SE (1996) The deep temporal lift: a multiplanar, lateral brow, temporal, and upper face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(5):928–937
LaTrenta GS (2004) Atlas of aesthetic face & neck surgery, 1st edn. Saunders, ix, Philadelphia, 347 pp
Lemke BN, Stasior OG (1982) The anatomy of eyebrow ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol 100(6):981–986
Miller TA, Rudkin G, Honig M, Elahi M, Adams J (2000) Lateral subcutaneous brow lift and interbrow muscle resection: clinical experience and anatomic studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1120–1127; discussion 1128
Larrabee WF Jr, Henderson JL (2000) Face lift: the anatomic basis for a safe, long-lasting procedure. Facial Plast Surg 16(3):239–253
Abul-Hassan HS, von Drasek Ascher G, Acland RD (1986) Surgical anatomy and blood supply of the fascial layers of the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 77(1):17–28
Tellioglu AT, Hosaka Y (2006) Temporoparietal fascia plication in rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30(2):175–180; discussion 81–82
Ramirez OM (1995) Endoscopically assisted biplanar forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(2):323–333
Tirkanits B, Daniel RK (1990) The “biplanar” forehead lift. Aesth Plast Surg 14(2):111–117
Fogli AL (2003) Temporal lift by galeapexy: a review of 270 cases. Aesth Plast Surg 27(3):159–165; discussion 166
de la Fuente A, Honig JF (2005) Video-assisted endoscopic transtemporal multilayer upper midface lift (MUM-Lift). J Craniofac Surg 16(2):267–276
Ramirez OM, Robertson KM (2002) Update in endoscopic forehead rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 10(1):37–51
Daniel RK, Tirkanits B (1996) Endoscopic forehead lift: an operative technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98(7):1148–1157; discussion 1158
Namazie AR, Keller GS (2001) Current practices in endoscopic brow and temporal lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 9(3):439–451
Jones BM, Grover R (2004) Endoscopic brow lift: a personal review of 538 patients and comparison of fixation techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(4):1242–1250; discussion 1251–1252
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshak, H., Morrow, A.A. & Morrow, D.M. Biplanar Temple Lift for Lateral Brow Ptosis: Comparison with Uniplanar Dissection Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 517–522 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9131-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9131-0