Skip to main content
Log in

Biplanar Temple Lift for Lateral Brow Ptosis: Comparison with Uniplanar Dissection Technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The amount of lift achievable in the temple region has been limited by traditional uniplanar dissection techniques. A biplanar temple-lifting technique (BTL), involving a biplanar dissection both deep and superficial to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) of the temporal region, is described. This study compares the amount of temporal lifting that can be achieved using a uniplanar dissection with that achieved using a biplanar dissection.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients underwent bilateral temple lifting. Deep dissection was performed on the surface of the deep temporalis fascia. The skin flap was pulled in a superolateral direction and the skin overlap at the wound edge was measured. A SMAS flap was then dissected beneath the dermis from the anterior wound edge to the temporal hairline. The SMAS flap was suspended superolaterally and fixated to the deep temporalis fascia. The skin flap was again pulled in a superolateral direction and the amount of skin overlap was measured and compared.

Results

The average potential temple skin that could be excised using the traditional dissection technique was 15.1 mm (range, 7–24 mm). The average temple skin that was excised using the biplanar dissection technique was 21.8 mm (range, 14–30 mm). The biplanar technique was shown to offer, on average, a 48% increase in lift relative to the skin-only approach. There were no cases of wound dehiscence, necrosis, or overcorrection.

Conclusion

Using the BTL technique to create a temporal SMAS flap, dissected free from overlying dermis as well as from deep temporal fascia, provides a more secure suspension of the temporal flap and significantly greater temple lift than a uniplanar dissection. The deep layering absorbs the tension of the lift, allowing for tensionless skin closure, thus decreasing the potential for scarring, hair loss, and necrosis. The increased mobility and higher suspension of the temporal flap allows for more skin excision and therefore a more pleasing lateral brow height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knize DM (1996) An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(7):1321–1333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrd HS, Andochick SE (1996) The deep temporal lift: a multiplanar, lateral brow, temporal, and upper face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(5):928–937

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. LaTrenta GS (2004) Atlas of aesthetic face & neck surgery, 1st edn. Saunders, ix, Philadelphia, 347 pp

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lemke BN, Stasior OG (1982) The anatomy of eyebrow ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol 100(6):981–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller TA, Rudkin G, Honig M, Elahi M, Adams J (2000) Lateral subcutaneous brow lift and interbrow muscle resection: clinical experience and anatomic studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1120–1127; discussion 1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larrabee WF Jr, Henderson JL (2000) Face lift: the anatomic basis for a safe, long-lasting procedure. Facial Plast Surg 16(3):239–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abul-Hassan HS, von Drasek Ascher G, Acland RD (1986) Surgical anatomy and blood supply of the fascial layers of the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 77(1):17–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tellioglu AT, Hosaka Y (2006) Temporoparietal fascia plication in rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30(2):175–180; discussion 81–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramirez OM (1995) Endoscopically assisted biplanar forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(2):323–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tirkanits B, Daniel RK (1990) The “biplanar” forehead lift. Aesth Plast Surg 14(2):111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fogli AL (2003) Temporal lift by galeapexy: a review of 270 cases. Aesth Plast Surg 27(3):159–165; discussion 166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de la Fuente A, Honig JF (2005) Video-assisted endoscopic transtemporal multilayer upper midface lift (MUM-Lift). J Craniofac Surg 16(2):267–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez OM, Robertson KM (2002) Update in endoscopic forehead rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 10(1):37–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel RK, Tirkanits B (1996) Endoscopic forehead lift: an operative technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98(7):1148–1157; discussion 1158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Namazie AR, Keller GS (2001) Current practices in endoscopic brow and temporal lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 9(3):439–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones BM, Grover R (2004) Endoscopic brow lift: a personal review of 538 patients and comparison of fixation techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(4):1242–1250; discussion 1251–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Marshak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshak, H., Morrow, A.A. & Morrow, D.M. Biplanar Temple Lift for Lateral Brow Ptosis: Comparison with Uniplanar Dissection Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 517–522 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9131-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9131-0

Keywords

Navigation